Assessment of carbon sequestration rate and tree diversity in a model urban green cover study using a college campus in Mangalore city

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/tcb.2950

Keywords:

biomass estimation, carbon sequestration, diversity index, GPS mapping, tree diversity

Abstract

The extant green cover in a 140-year-old St Aloysius College campus in Mangalore, Karnataka, India, was used as a model to study tree diversity and carbon-sequestering rate (CSR), using a non-destructive biostatistics-based method. The results of the study indicated that the campus constituted a highly diverse tree flora with a Shannon Diversity index of 4.07. A total of 169 different tree species were found on the campus with an average population size of 9.98 per species. The green cover of 4.67 ha of the total area of the campus had a tree density of 361.03 trees/ha. Five tree species, namely Polyanthia longifolia, Cocos nucifera, Tectona grandis, Terminalia catappa, and Areca catechu, dominated the area. Using allometric equations, the total green cover in the campus area with biomass of 4594.6 Kg, which sequestered 8431.1 Kg of carbon at a carbon sequestration rate of 84.31 Kg per year was deduced. Olea europaea and Phoenix dactylifera, with the highest CSR of 0.09 and 0.08, respectively, were the most effective in sequestering 12.54 Kg and 11.19 Kg of carbon. The highest amount of Carbon sequestered (CS) per tree was in Olea europaea (12.54 Kg) and Phoenix dactylifera (11.19 Kg), followed by Acacia auriculiformis (10.44 Kg), and Adenanthera pavonina (10.08 Kg). It was observed that the amount of carbon sequestered decreased with the decrease in tree girth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baral A, Guha GS. Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004;27:41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.004

Jim CY. Heterogeneity and differentiation of the tree flora in three major land uses in Guangzhou City, China. Ann Forest Sci. 2002;59:107–118. DOI: 10.1051/forest: 2001010

Khera N, Mehta V, Sabata BC. Interrelationships of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India. Urban For Urban Green 2009;8:187–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.001

Cornelis J, Hermy M. Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc Urban Plan 2004;69:385–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038

Jim CY, Chen WY. Diversity and distribution of landscape trees in the compact Asian city of Taipei. ApplGeogr 2009;29:577–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.01.002

Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 2010;25(2):90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016

Sudha P, Ravindranath NH. A study of Bangalore urban forest", Landscape and Urban Planning 2000;47(1-2):47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00067-5

Chavan BL, Rasal GB. Sequestered standing carbon stock in selective tree species grown in university campus at Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. IJEST 2010;2(7): 3003-3007.

Nagendra H, Gopal D. Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban parks: studies in Bangalore, India. Urban Ecosyst 2011;14(2):211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0148-1

Haghparast H, Delbari AS, Kulkarni DK. Carbon sequestration in Pune university campus with special reference to geographical information system (GIS). Annals of Biological Research 2013;4(4):169-175.

Suryawanshi MN, Patel AR, Kale TS, Patil PR. Carbon sequestration potential of tree species in the environment of North Maharashtra University campus, Jalgaon (MS) India. Biosci. Disc. 2014;5(2): 175-179.

Das M, Mukherjee A. Carbon sequestration potential, its correlation with height and girth of selected trees in the Golapbag campus, Burdwan, West Bengal (India). Indian J Sci Res 2015;10(1):53-57.

Ganguly S, Mukherjee A. A census of the tree species in the Golapbag campus of Burdwan University, West Bengal (India) with their IUCN red list status and carbon sequestration potential of some selected species. Indian J Sci Res 2016;7(1):67-75.

Gavali RS, Shaikh HMY. Estimation of Carbon storage in the tree growth of Solapur University Campus, Maharashtra, India. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2016;5:2364–2367.

Marak T, Khare N. (2017) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Selected Tree Species in the Campus of SHUATS. IJSRD 2017;5(6):63-66. DOI: 10.5061/dryad.69sg2

Sahu C, Nayak HN, Sahu SK. Carbon sequestration potential of trees in an urban area: A case study of Sambalpur town in eastern India" Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2020;29(10):8757-8766.

Sharma R, Pradhan L, Kumari M, Bhattacharya P. Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Potential of Tree Species in Amity University Campus Noida. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021;3:52. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-08075

Redowan M. Spatial pattern of tree diversity and evenness across forest types in Majella National Park, Italy. Forest Ecosystems 2015;2:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-015-0048-1

Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949;163:688. doi:10.1038/163688a0

Desai TB, Nandikar M. Impact of urbanization on avenue trees and its role in carbon sequestration: a case study in Kolhapur city", International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2012;3(1):481-486. DOI: 10.6088/ijes.2012030131046

Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of IIIinonois, Urban Press IIIinois, 1963. p. 177.

Pielou EC, Ecological diversity. Limnol Oceanogr 1975;22(1):172–174. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0174b

Pandya IY, Salvi H, Chahar O, Vaghela N. Quantitative analysis on carbon storage of 25 valuable tree species of Gujarat, incredible India. Indian J. Sci. Res. 2013;4(1):137-141.

Nowak D. Air Pollution Removal by Chicago’s Urban Forest. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem. Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project 1994;63-81.

Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution 2013;178:229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019

Brown S, Gillespie A, Lugo AE. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science 1989;35(4):881- 902. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/35.4.881

Zanne AE, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Coomes DA, Ilic J, Jansen S, Lewis SL, et al. Global wood density database. Dryad 2009; Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.235

Hangarge LM, Kulkarni DK, Gaikwad VB, Mahajan DM, Chaudhari N. Carbon Sequestration potential of tree species in Somjaichi Rai (Sacred grove) at Nandghur village, in Bhor region of Pune District, Maharashtra State, India. Annals of Biological Research 2012;3(7):3426-3429.

Pearson T, Brown S, Ravindranath NH. Integrating carbon benefits estimates into GEF. Projects. UNDP GEF Capacity Development and Adaptation Group Guidelines 2005;1-56.

Sathish BN, Viswanath S, Kushalappa C, Jagadish MR, Ganeshaiah KN. Comparative assessment of floristic structure, diversity and regeneration status of tropical rain forests of Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2013;5(1):157-164. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v5i1.300

Care Earth, (2006) "Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity on the Campus of Indian Institute of Technology – Madras", Retrieved from https://www.iitm.ac.in/sites/default/files/uploads/campus_biodiversity_report.pdf

Waran A, Patwardhan A. Urban carbon burden of Pune City: A case study from India. Masters [Thesis], University of Pune, India; 2001.

Bhat SS, Bhandary J, Fasihuddin S. Urban tree diversity of Karwar, Karnataka. Lake 2010: Wetlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change 2010; 1-8.

Rathore A, Jasrai Y. Evaluating Temperature and Precipitation variability over Gujarat, India from 1957-2007. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 2013;4(5):956-62.

Gupta RB, Chaudhari PR, Wate SR. Floristic diversity in urban forest area of NEERI Campus, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India). J Environ. Sci Eng. 2008;50(1):55-62.

Nowak DJ, Crane DE. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 2002;116(3):381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7

Prabha SJ, Santhosh Kumar TM, Shrinidhi R, Megha M. Quantitative analysis of carbon storage capacity in the standing biomass of semi-arid regions of Ramdurga Taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka. Asian J Sci and Tech 2017;8(11):6510-6515.

Nowak DJ. The interactions between urban forests and global climate change. In: Abdollahi KK, Ning ZH, Appeaning A. editors. Global Climate Change and the Urban Forest. Baton Rouge, LA: GCRCC and Franklin Press: 2000. p. 31–44.

Schneider SH. The changing climate. Scientific American 1989;261(3):70–79.

Hamburg SP, Harris N, Jaeger J, Karl TR, McFarland M, Mitchell JFB, Oppenheimer M, Santer S, Schneider S, Trenberth KE, Wigley TML. Common questions about climate change. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, World Meteorology Organization. 1997. p. 24.

Jansson C, Wullschleger S, Kalluri U, Tuskan G. Phytosequestration: Carbon Biosequestration by Plants and the Prospects of Genetic Engineering. BioScience 2010;60(9):685–696. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.6

Osman AI, Fawzy S, Lichtfouse E, Rooney DW. Planting trees to combat global warming. Environ Chem Lett 2023;21:3041–3044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01598-y

Surya Prabha AC, Senthivelu M, Krishna kumar N, Nagendran S. Urban forests and their role in carbon sequestration: a review. International Journal of Financial Research 2013;16(1): 23–29, 2013.

Asfaw Z, Zergaw Y. Woody Species Diversity and Biomass Carbon Sequestration in Private Residential Green Infrastructure of Dilla Town, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4017094

Downloads

Published

09-01-2024 — Updated on 22-02-2024

Versions

Issue

Section

Research Articles