Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

A high throughput investigation on transfer tools for nematodes in various suspension

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6506
Submitted
3 December 2024
Published
25-01-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of three different tools-forceps, needle and wire pick for
transferring Root-Knot Nematode (RKN) females in various suspension media (water, formalin and
lactophenol). The performance of each tool was assessed based on picking time, number of females
transferred per minute, damage rates and overall picking efficiency. The wire picks consistently
demonstrated the highest picking efficiency, achieving 99 % in water suspension, 98 % in formalin
suspension and 98 % in lactophenol suspension. It outperformed both the forceps and needle in
terms of speed, precision and minimal damage. The forceps showed lower efficiency and higher
damage, particularly in water and lactophenol suspensions, while the needle, though more efficient
than the forceps, was less effective compared to the wire pick in all scenarios. These findings
highlight the wire pick as the most effective tool for RKN female and vermiform nematode transfer
across different media and emphasize the need for selecting appropriate tools to optimize nematode
handling in research and practical applications.

References

  1. Yang J, Wu X, Chen Y, Yang Z, Liu J, Wu D, Wang D. Combined attributes of soil nematode communities as indicators of grassland degradation. Ecological Indicators. 2021;131:108215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108215
  2. Rae R, Riebesell M, Dinkelacker I, Wang Q, Herrmann M, Weller AM, et al. Isolation of naturally associated bacteria of necromenic Pristionchus nematodes and fitness consequences. J Exper Biol. 2008;211(12):1927–36. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.014944
  3. Blaxter LM, De Ley P, Garey RJ, Liu XL, Scheldeman P, Vierstraete A, et al. A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature. 1998;392:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/32160
  4. Jorge F, Perera A, Poulin R, Roca V, Carretero MA. Getting there and around: Host range oscillations during colonization of the Canary Islands by the parasitic nematode Spauligodon. Molecular Ecology. 2018;27(2):533–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14458
  5. Soliman GM, Ameen HH, Abdel-Aziz SM, El-Sayed GM. In vitro evaluation of some isolated bacteria against the plant parasite nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2019;43:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0200-0
  6. Gugino BK, Ludwig JW, Abawi GS. An on-farm bioassay for assessing Meloidogyne hapla infestations as a decision management tool. Crop Protection. 2008;27(3-5):785–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.11.004
  7. Grewal PS, Ehlers RU, Shapiro-Ilan DI. Nematodes as biocontrol agents. CABI Publishing; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990170.0000
  8. Nicol JM, Turner SJ, Coyne DL, den Nijs L, Hockland S, Maafi ZT. Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In: Jones J, Gheysen G, Fenoll C, editors. Genomics and molecular genetics of plant-nematode interactions. Springer; 2011. p. 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0434-3_2
  9. Xu M, Liu Q, Zhang Z, Liu X. Response of free-living marine nematodes to the southern Yellow Sea cold water mass. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016;105(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.067
  10. Campos-Herrera R, El-Borai FE, Stuart RJ, Graham JH, Duncan LW. Entomopathogenic nematodes, phoretic Paenibacillus spp. and the use of real-time quantitative PCR to explore soil food webs in Florida citrus groves. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2011;108(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2011.06.005
  11. Jenkins WR. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter. 1964;48:692.
  12. Oostenbrink M. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. Nematology. 1960;6:85–102.
  13. Hooper DJ. Handling, fixing, staining and mounting nematodes. In: Southey JF, editor. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1986. p. 59–80 https://doi.org/10.1163/187529286x00408
  14. Eisenback JD, Hunt DJ. Handling, fixing, staining and mounting nematodes. In: Perry RN, Moens M, Hunt DJ, editors. Techniques for work with plant and soil nematodes. CABI; 2021. p. 71–87 https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786391759.0071
  15. Perry RN, Moens M. Plant nematology. CAB International; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845930561.0000
  16. Bongers T, Ferris H. Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1999;14(6):224–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01583-3
  17. Gaugler R, Kaya HK. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351071741
  18. Flegg JJM. Extraction of Xiphinema and Longidorus species from soil by a modification of Cobb’s decanting and sieving technique. Annals of Applied Biology. 1967;60(3):429–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1967.tb04497.x
  19. Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN, editors. Nematode extraction and bioassays. In: An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne, Vol. II: Methodology. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Graphics; 1985. p. 19–35
  20. Walia RK, Bajaj HK. General techniques for nematode identification with light microscopy. In: Identification of Important Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Department of Nematology, CCS HAU Hisar; 2010. p. 1–11
  21. Montarry J, Mimee B, Danchin EG, Koutsovoulos GD, Ste-Croix DT, Grenier E. Recent advances in population genomics of plant-parasitic nematodes. Phytopathology. 2021;111(1):40–48. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-09-20-0418-rvw
  22. Perry RN, Hunt DJ, Subbotin SA, editors. Techniques for work with plant and soil nematodes. CABI; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786391759.0000
  23. Atkinson HJ. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species) systematics, biology and control. Physiological Plant Pathology. 1980;16(2):301–02. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-4059(80)90044-2
  24. Stevenson JA. Plant pathology: An advanced treatise. JG Horsfall, AE Dimond, editors. In: The Diseased Plant. Academic Press; 1959. p. 674 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3410.1368
  25. Whitehead AG, Hemming JR. A comparison of methods for extracting nematodes from soil. Annual Applied Biology. 1965;55(2):25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb07864
  26. Senthilkumar M, Amaresan N, Sankaranarayanan A. Extraction of nematodes from plant materials. In: Plant-Microbe Interactions. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana, New York, NY; 2021. p. 77 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1080-0_77
  27. Viaene N, Hallmann J, Molendijk LPG. Methods for nematode extraction. In: Perry RN, Hunt DJ, Subbotin SA, editors. Techniques for work with plant and soil nematodes. CABI; 2021. p. 12–41 https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786391759.0012
  28. Cobb NA. A nematode formula. Bulletin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1890. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46872
  29. Stirling GR. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: An ecological perspective, a review of progress and opportunities for further research. In: Davies K, Spiegel Y, editors. Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Progress in Biological Control, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht; 2011. p. 1–38 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9648-8_1
  30. Boyd WA, McBride SJ, Rice RJ, Snyder DW, Freedman JH. A high-throughput method for assessing chemical toxicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans reproduction assay. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2010;245(2):153–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.014
  31. Xian B, Shen J, Chen W, Sun N, Qiao N, Jiang D, et al. Worm Farm: a quantitative control and measurement device towards automated Caenorhabditis elegans aging analysis. Aging Cell. 2013;12(3):398–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12063
  32. Buckingham SD, Partridge FA, Sattelle DB. Automated, high-throughput, motility analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans and parasitic nematodes: Applications in the search for new anthelmintics. Int J Parasitol: Drugs and Drug Res. 2014;4(3):226–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.004

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.