Wine production from ripen pond apple (Annona glabra L.) fruit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1617Keywords:
Clarification, Maceration, Malolactic fermentation, Pond apple wineAbstract
Pond apple (Annona glabra L.) trees were widely distributed in swamp regions of Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Pond apple fruits turned from green to yellow when ripening. Ripen pond apple fruits contained numerous phenolic constituents with valuable phytochemical benefits. However, ripen pond apple fruits were not successfully utilized as other commercial fruits. This research examined the possibility of wine production utilized from ripen pond apple fruits. Different various technical variables of fermentation affecting to the quality of pond apple wine were thoroughly examined. Ripen pond apple fruits were naturally collected from Soc Trang province, Vietnam. Ripen pond apple fruits were peeled, blended, deseeded, crushed, enzyme-treated (pectinase 25 mg/L), added with sugar (5-13% w/w), pasteurized (sulphite 30 mg/L), inoculated with yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus ratio (0.1-0.5%), macerated temperature (14-22oC) in different time (6-14 days). Malolactic fermentation was performed in anaerobic condition at 12oC in different durations (4-20 weeks). At the end of malolactic fermentation, wine was racked and clarified with different fining agents (bentonite, polyvinylpyrrolidone, wheat gluten, gelatin, kaolin) at 0.03% (v/v). Results showed that must should be added with 9% sugar and 0.4% yeast inoculation, fermentation temperature of 16oC in 10 days. Malolactic fermentation could be terminated at 12 weeks. Gelatin revealed the best candidate among different clarifying agents to remove turbidity in pond apple wine while retaining the most total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. Under above technical variable conditions, fermentation gave the high ethanol content (4.26±0.02 % v/v); the total phenolic content (32.79±0.00 mg GAE/100 ml), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging (11.84±0.01 %), overall acceptance (8.34±0.01 score) meanwhile low turbidity (24.41±0.00 NTU) was also noticed. High ethanol content and phytochemical retention contributed to the high sensory score of pond apple wine. These quality parameters were acceptable for an alcoholic drink. Ripen pond apple fruit would be a promising carbohydrate source to convert into a new fruit wine with a pleasant alcoholic flavor and attractive appearance.
Downloads
References
Nguyen P, Thang T and Trinh Q. Study on the quality parameters of pond apple jam (Annona glabra L.). Tra Vinh University Journal of Science 2019; 1(34): 69-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.35382/18594816.1.34.2019.193.
Liu XX, Alali FQ and Pilarinou E. Two bioactive mono-tetrahydrofuran acetogenins, annoglacins A and B, from Annona glabra. Phytochemistry 1999; 50: 815–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00466-x
Li CM, Tan NH and Zheng HL. Cyclopeptides from the seeds of Annona glabra. Phytochemistry 1999; 50: 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00631-1
Chen CH, Hsieh TJ, Liu TZ. Annoglabayin, a novel dimeric kaurane diterpenoid, and apoptosis in Hep G2 cells of annomontacin from the fruits of Annona glabra. Journal of Natural Products 2004; 67:1942–1946. https://doi.org/10.1021/np040078j
Tsai SF and Lee SS. Characterization of acetylcholinesterase inhibitory constituents from Annona glabra assisted by HPLC microfractionation. Journal of Natural Products 2010; 73: 1632–1635. https://doi.org/10.1021/np100247r
Nguyen TTH, Nguyen XN, Duong THY, Dan TTH, Bui HT, Tran HQ, Hoang LTA, Phan VK, Chau VM, Eun-Ji K, Seung HK, Hee KK and Young HK. Chemical constituents of the Annona glabra fruit and their cytotoxic activity, Pharmaceutical Biology 2015; 53(11): 1602-1607. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2014.993042
Jagtap UB and Bapat VA. Wines from fruits other than grapes: current status and future prospectus. Food Bioscience 2015; 9: 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2014.12.002
Ong KL, Kaur G, Pensupa N, Uisan K and Lin CSK. Trends in food waste valorization for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels: case study south and Southeast Asia. Bioresource Technology 2018; 248:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.076
Edwards CG and Watson BA. Basic microbiological and chemical analyses for wine. Washington State University Cooperative Extension EM047: Pullman, WA, USA, 2013.
Mei-Ling W, Youk-Meng C, Nan-Wei S and Min-Hsiung L. A rapid method for determination of ethanol in alcoholic beverages using capillary gas chromatography. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 2003; 11(2): 133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2710
Singleton VL and Rossi JAJR. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicphosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1965; 16: 144–158. https://www.ajevonline.org/content/16/3/144
Englezos V, Rantsiou K, Cravero F, Torchio F, Ortiz-Julien A and Gerbi V. Starmerella bacillaris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed fermentations to reduce ethanol content in wine. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2016; 100(12): 5515-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7413-z
Rollero S, Bloem A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C and Divol B. Altered fermentation performances, growth, and metabolic footprints reveal competition for nutrients between yeast species inoculated in synthetic grape juice-like medium. Frontiers in Microbiology 2018; 9: 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00196
Derek K, Debra LI, Gary JP and Andrew R. Effect of yeast inoculation rate, acclimatization, and nutrient addition on icewine fermentation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2004; 55(4): 363-370.
Gibson B and Liti G. Saccharomyces pastorianus: Genomic insights inspiring innovation for industry. Yeast 2015; 32: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3033
Troianou V, Toumpeki C, Dorignac E, Kogkou C, Kallithraka S and Kotseridis Y. Evaluation of Saccharomyces pastorianus impact to Sauvignon blanc chemical & sensory profile compared to different strains of S. cerevisiae/bayanus. BIO Web of Conferences 2019; 12: 02025. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191202025
Dimopoulou M, Troianou V, Toumpeki C, Gosselin Y, Dorignac, Etienne and Kotseridis Y. Effect of strains from different Saccharomyces species used in different inoculation schemes on chemical composition and sensory characteristics of Sauvignon blanc wine. OENO One 2020; 54(4): 745–759. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3240
O’Connor-Cox ESC and Ingledew WM. Alleviation of the effects of nitrogen limitation in high gravity worts through increased inoculation rates. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 1991; 7: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576070
Massera A, Assof M, Sari S, Ciklic I, Mercado L, Jofre V and Combina M. Effect of low temperature fermentation on the yeast-derived volatile aroma composition and sensory profile in Merlot wines. LWT 2021; 142: 111069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111069
Wojdy?o A, Samoticha J and Chmielewska J. Effect of different pre-treatment maceration techniques on the content of phenolic compounds and color of Dornfelder wines elaborated in cold climate. Food Chemistry 2021; 339: 127888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127888
Vamvakas SS and Kapolos J. Factors affecting yeast ethanol tolerance and fermentation efficiency. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 36: 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02881-8
Gambacorta G, Trani A, Fasciano C, Paradiso VM and Faccia M. Effects of prefermentative cold soak on polyphenols and volatiles of Aglianico, Primitivo and Nero di Troia red wines. Food Science and Nutrition 2019; 7: 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.817
Unterkofler J, Muhlack RA and Jeffery DW. Processes and purposes of extraction of grape components during winemaking: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 104: 4737–4755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10558-3
Pizarro FJ, Jewett MC, Nielsen J and Agosin E. Growth temperature exerts differential physiological and transcriptional responses in laboratory and wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Environment Microbiology 2008; 74: 6358–6368. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128%2FAEM.00602-08
Sener A, Canbas A and Unal MU. The effect of fermentation temperature on the growth kinetics of wine yeast species. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2007; 31: 349-354.
Jackson RS. Wine science. Academic Press, USA, 2000.
Rodrigues AJ, Raimbourg T, Gonzalez R and Morales P. Environmental factors influencing the efficacy of different yeast strains for alcohol level reduction in wine by respiration. LWT Food Science Technology 2016; 65: 1038–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.09.046
Torija MJ, Beltran G, Novo M, Poblet M, Guillamon JM and Mas A. Effects of fermentation temperature and saccharomyces species on the cell fatty acid composition and presence of volatile compounds in wine. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2003; 85: 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00506-8
Iorizzo M, Letizia F, Albanese G, Coppola F, Gambuti A, Testa B, Aversano R, Forino M and Coppola R. Potential for lager beer production from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from the vineyard environment. Processes 2021; 9: 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ pr9091628
Ruiz-Rodriguez A, Palma M and Barroso CG. Influence of temperature during pre-fermentative maceration and alcoholic fermentation on the phenolic composition of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ wines. Foods 2021; 10: 1053. https:// doi.org/10.3390/foods10051053
Vidrih R and Hribar J. Synthesis of higher alcohols during cider processing. Food Chemistry 1999; 67: 287–294. http://higiene.unex.es/bibliogr/Proteoli/highalco.pdf
Okamura T, Ogata T, Minamimoto N, Takeno T, Noda H and Fukuda S. Characteristics of wine produced by mushroom fermentation. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochemistry 2001; 65:1596–1600. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.65.1596
Chin WH, Azwan L, Shazrul F, Umi KHHZ, Salvatore M and Seng JL. Alcoholic fermentation of soursop (Annona muricata) juice via an alternative fermentation technique. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 2020; 100: 1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10103
Schmidt CG, Goncalves LM, Prietto L, Hackbart HS and Furlong EB. Antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibition of phenolic acids from fermented rice bran with fungus Rizhopus oryzae. Food Chemistry 2014; 146: 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.101
Su MS and Chien PJ. Antioxidant activity, anthocyanins, and phenolics of rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei) fluid products as affected by fermentation. Food Chemistry 2007; 104:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.023
Andlauer W, Stumpf C, and Furst P. Influence of the acetification process on phenolic compounds. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2000; 48: 3533–3536. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000010j
Wang L, Sun X, Li F, Yu D, Liu X, Huang W. Dynamic changes in phenolic compounds, colour and antioxidant activity of mulberry wine during alcoholic fermentation. Journal of Functional Foods 2015; 18: 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.07.013
Liu S. A review: Malolactic fermentation in wine - Beyond deacidification. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2002; 92(4): 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01589.x
Nikos Z. Study of malolactic fermentation. Conditions of adding lactic bacteria. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry 2020; 13(11): 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/5736-1311011721
Antalick G, Perello MC, and de Revel G. Characterization of fruity aroma modifications in red wines during malolactic fermentation. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 2012; 60(50): 12371–12383. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303238n
Zikos N and Liouni M. Bottle storage and air exposed red wines: Investigation of their antioxidant activity. Journal of Science and Technology 2019; 14(1): 1-10. http://ejst.uniwa.gr/issues/issue_59/Zikos_59.pdf
Virdis C, Sumby K, Bartowsky E and Jiranek V. Lactic acid bacteria in wine: technological advances and evaluation of their functional role. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021; 11: 612118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.612118
Benitez E and Lozano JE. Influence of the soluble solid on the Zeta potential of a cloudy apple juice. Latin American Applied Research 2006; 36: 163-168.
Dordoni R, Galasi R, Colangelo D, De Faveri DM and Lambri M. Effects of fining with different bentonite labels and doses on colloidal stability and colour of a Valpolicella red wine. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2015; 50(10): 2246-2254. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12875.
Awe S. Effect of clarifying agents (gelatin and kaolin) on fruit wine production. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 2018; 6(4): 130-132. https://ijair.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJAIR_2130_FINAL.pdf
Ficagna E, Gava A, Rossato SB, Rombaldi CV and Borsato D. Effect on Merlot red wine of fining agents mixture: application of the simplex centroid design. Food Science and Technology, Campinas 2020; 40(3): 729-735. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.18719
Gupta RB and Shepherd KW. Two-step one-dimensional SDSPAGE analysis of LGM subunits of glutenin. I. Variation and genetic control of the subunits in hexaploid wheats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1990; 80: 65-74.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224017
Richard M, Laurence MD, Franck M, Maryline P, Armelle L and Philippe J. Use of wheat gluten as clarifying agent of musts and white wines. American Journal of Enololgy and Viticulture 2002; 53(4): 308-314.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-04-2022 (2)
- 21-03-2022 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nguyen Phuoc Minh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
