Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

ITS2 secondary structure data improves authentication of Moringa oleifera tea products when using with DNA barcoding

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2094
Submitted
31 August 2022
Published
28-07-2023
Versions

Abstract

Adulteration is a severe issue affecting the herbal industry. Therefore, a robust tool is needed to address this problem. In the current study, Moringabased products (tea) authentication was conducted using DNA barcoding. Two different barcode regions, rbcL and ITS2, were investigated in terms of their effectiveness in authenticating the herbal products. To proceed with the DNA barcoding, a good quality of gDNA is a prerequisite for PCR amplification. Hence, two lysis buffers, PL1 and PL2, were compared to obtain good quality gDNA. Results revealed that a higher gDNA yield was obtained from the fresh plants using PL2, but a lower gDNA yield was obtained for the tea products except for sample P3. The PCR reaction was successfully conducted by amplifying two different barcodes, rbcL and ITS2. The amplicon size for the fresh plant was 643 bp for rbcL and 404 bp for ITS2. In contrast, the generated rbcL amplicon sizes for herbal tea products were 672 bp for P1, 679 bp for P2, 679 bp for P3, and 674 bp for P4. For rbcL and ITS2 amplicon sizes were 395 bp for P1, 406 bp for P2, 398 bp for P3, and 413 bp for P4. The amplified PCR products were analyzed using bioinformatic tools. The neighbour-joining (NJ) analysis for the rbcL barcode indicated that the P2, P3, and P4 tea products were categorized in the same clade with the M. oleifera sequence obtained from GenBank. Simultaneously, P1 was clustered individually with other closely related species. The analysis for the ITS2 barcode showed that all samples were grouped in the same clade. Incorporating secondary structure prediction after NJ analysis improved the discrimination between species.

References

  1. Lo YT, Shaw PC. Application of next-generation sequencing for the identification of herbal products. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37 (8):107450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107450
  2. Ahmad Khan MS, Ahmad I. Herbal medicine: Current trends and future prospects [Internet]. New look to phytomedicine: Advancements in herbal products as novel drug leads. Elsevier Inc. 2018;3-13 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814619-4.00001-X
  3. Izzany F, Bakar A, Fadzelly M, Bakar A, Abdullah N, Endrini S et al. A review of Malaysian medicinal plants with potential antidiabetic. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2018;2018:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8603602
  4. Campanaro A, Tommasi N, Guzzetti L, Galimberti A, Bruni I, Labra M. DNA barcoding to promote social awareness and identity of neglected, underutilized plant species having valuable nutritional properties. Food Res Int. 2019;115:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.031
  5. Galimberti A, De Mattia F, Losa A, Bruni I, Federici S, Casiraghi M et al. DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int. 2013;50(1):55-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.09.036
  6. Liu M, Li XW, Liao BS, Luo L, Ren YY. Species identification of poisonous medicinal plant using DNA barcoding. Chin J Nat Med. 2019;17(8):585-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5364(19)30060-3
  7. Techen N, Parveen I, Pan Z, Khan IA. DNA barcoding of medicinal plant material for identification. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;25:103-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.010
  8. Duan BZ, Wang YP, Fang HL, Xiong C, Li XW, Wang P et al. Authenticity analyses of Rhizoma Paridis using barcoding coupled with high resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis to control its quality for medicinal plant product. Chinese Med (United Kingdom).2018;13(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-018-0162-4
  9. Yu N, Wei YL, Zhang X, Zhu N, Wang YL, Zhu Y et al. Barcode ITS2: A useful tool for identifying Trachelospermum jasminoides and a good monitor for medicine market. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04674-w
  10. Singh DP, Kumar A, Rodrigues V, Prabhu KN, Kaushik A, Mani DN et al. DNA barcoding coupled with secondary structure information enhances Achyranthes species resolution. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2020;19:100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2020.100269
  11. Liu ZW, Gao YZ, Zhou J. Molecular authentication of the medicinal species of Ligusticum (ligustici rhizoma et radix, “gao-ben”) by integrating non-coding internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) and its secondary structure. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10(April):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00429
  12. Zhang W, Yuan Y, Yang S, Huang J, Huang L. ITS2 secondary structure improves discrimination between medicinal “Mu tong” species when using DNA barcoding. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131185
  13. Coleman AW, Mai JC. Ribosomal DNA ITS-1 and ITS-2 sequence comparisons as a tool for predicting genetic relatedness. J Mol Evol. 1997;45(2):168-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006217
  14. Coleman AW. ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends Genet. 2003;19(7):370-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00118-5
  15. Acharya GC, Mohanty S, Dasgupta M, Sahu S, Singh S, Koundinya AVV et al. Molecular phylogeny, DNA barcoding and ITS2 secondary structure predictions in the medicinally important Eryngium genotypes of East Coast Region of India. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091678
  16. Muhammad HI, Asmawi MZ, Khan NAK. A review on promising phytochemical, nutritional and glycemic control studies on Moringa oleifera Lam. in tropical and sub-tropical regions. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6(10):896-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.08.006
  17. Gopalakrishnan L, Doriya K, Kumar DS. Moringa oleifera: A review on nutritive importance and its medicinal application.Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2016;5(2):49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.001
  18. Gupta S, Jain R, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL. Nutritional and medicinal applications of Moringa oleifera Lam.—Review of current status and future possibilities. J Herb Med. 2018;11:1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2017.07.003
  19. Coz-Bolaños X, Campos-Vega R, Reynoso-Camacho R, RamosGómez M, Loarca-Piña GF, Guzmán-Maldonado SH. Moringa infusion (Moringa oleifera) rich in phenolic compounds and high antioxidant capacity attenuate nitric oxide pro-inflammatory mediator in vitro. Ind Crops Prod [Internet]. 2018;118(August 2017):95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.028
  20. Sahu SK, Thangaraj M, Kathiresan K. ‘DNA extraction protocol for plants with high levels of secondary metabolites and polysaccharides without using liquid nitrogen and phenol’. ISRN Mol Biol. 2012(October); pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/205049
  21. Rayan W. Evaluating the efficiency of DNA Barcode rbcL for detection of genetic relationships between four Moringa spp. gen-otypes. Egypt J Exp Biol. 2019;15(2):333. https://doi.org/10.5455/egyjebb.20190722115434
  22. Gu W, Song J, Cao Y, Sun Q, Yao H, Wu Q et al. Application of the ITS2 region for barcoding medicinal plants of selaginellaceae in pteridophyta. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):2-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067818
  23. Janzen D. A DNA barcode for land plants. 2015;45(143):199-206.
  24. Nurhasanah, Sundari, Papuangan N. Amplification and analysis of Rbcl gene (Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase) of clove in ternate island. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;276(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/276/1/012061
  25. Grazina L, Amaral JS, Mafra I. Botanical origin authentication of dietary supplements by DNA-based approaches. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(3):1080-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12551
  26. Pedales RD, Damatac AM, Limbo CA, Marquez CMD, Navarro AIB, Molina J. DNA barcoding of philippine herbal medicinal products. J AOAC Int. 2016;99(6):1479-89. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.16-0185
  27. Molina J, Sherpa C, Ng J, Sonam T, Stuhr N. DNA barcoding of online herbal supplements: Crowd-sourcing pharmacovigilance in high school. Open Life Sci. 2018;13(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2018-0007
  28. Feng S, Jiang M, Shi Y, Jiao K, Shen C, Lu J et al. Application of the ribosomal DNA ITS2 region of physalis (Solanaceae): DNA barcoding and phylogenetic study. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7 (2016JULY):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01047
  29. Kapoor N, Gambhir L, Saxena S. Secondary structure prediction of ITS rRNA region and molecular phylogeny: An integrated approach for the precise speciation of Muscodor species. Ann Microbiol. 2018;68(11):763-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1381-8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.