This is an outdated version published on 13-05-2023. Read the most recent version.
Forthcoming

Evaluation of physicochemical properties with the availability of plant nutrients in forests and crop farms in different Fijian provinces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2261

Keywords:

Agriculture farms, forest farms, Fiji, plant nutrients, soil properties

Abstract

Soils are the foundation of agriculture and forestry and it provides many functions such as the supply of water and nutrients and anchorage for plant growth and more. Forest farming and agriculture farming are 2 entities of the ecosystem and they may lead to changes in soil properties. To cope with the challenges in the soil management system, data on current chemical and physical soil properties are more necessary. Therefore, we present a comparative study on soil properties existing in soil and forest farms of Fiji Island. Soil samples from 24 different locations were collected from 8 sites based on the heterogeneity and land use of soils, keeping in view the variation in soil type and slope to determine physicochemical properties and nutrient status. The physical properties such as bulk density (1.05-1.20 Mg m-3), percent porosity (54.14-56.62), moisture % (16.78-18.53%) and soil permeability (11.79-12.35 cm hour-1 was comparatively higher in forest farms compared to the agricultural farms. The soil pH in forest farms and agriculture farms ranged from 5.42-6.10 and 5.30-5.61 respectively. A higher range of CEC was found in forest farms (17.7-19.2) may be due to the higher amount of soil organic matter in forest farms in comparison to agricultural farms. The results also showed that the nutrients such as N, P, K, Ca and Mg and micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) values were low on the agricultural farms.  The study suggests the combined use of good agricultural practices, limited use of agrochemicals and minimal soil disturbance at agriculture farms to prevent further degradation, acidification and nutrient stocks.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell RW, Dell B. Micronutrients for sustainable food, feed, fibre and bioenergy production. IFA, Paris, France. 2008; p. 1-195.

Jat ML, Singh B, Stirling CM, Jat HS, Tetarwal JP, Jat RK et al. Soil processes and wheat cropping under emerging climate change scenarios in South Asia. 2018; p. 111-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.11.006

Gelybó Gy, Barcza Z, Dencs? M, Potyó I, Kása I, Horel Á et al. Effect of tillage and crop type on soil respiration in a long-term field experiment on chernozem soil under temperate climate. Soil Tillage Res. 2022; 216:105-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105239

Brady NC, Weil RR. The nature and properties of soils. 13th ed. Upper Saddle River N.J: Prentice Hall; 2002.

Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Improving nutrient use efficiency of annual crops in Brazilian acid soils for sustainable crop production. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2001;32:1303-19. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104114

Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA. The soil management assessment framework. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2004;68(6):1945-62. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945

James K. Soil health and soil quality: A review; 2007. http://www.worldaginfo.org/files/Soil%20Health%20Review.pdf

Renaud F, Kuenzer C. The Mekong delta system - Interdisciplinary analyses of a river delta. Springer Environmental Science and Engineering, Berlin, Germany; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8

Singh IR, Sharma AC, Goswami SN. Nutrient status and their availability in relation to properties of soils of Koronivia, Fiji. Fiji Agricultural Journal. 2013;53:1-6.

Fiji Meteorological Service: Annual Climate Summary https://www.met.gov.fj/index.php?page=climateSummaries#June%202021annualSum2021.06.07%2011.10.46.pdf. 2020.

Annual report. Secretariat of the Pacific Community Land Resources Division: Nabua, Fiji: Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC). p. 82 https://purl.org/spc/digilib/doc/px9zd. 2012.

Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils agricultural handbook No.60, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C; 1954.

Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. 1st Ed. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India; 1973.

Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 1978;42:421-28. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x

Sakal R, Singh AP, Singh BP, Sinha RB, Jha SN, Singh SP. Distribution of available micronutrient cations in calcareous soils as related to certain soil properties. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 1998; 33:672-75.

Takkar PN, Mann MS. Evaluation of analytical methods for estimating available zinc in major soil series of Ludhiana, India. Agrochemica. 1975;19:420.

Osman KT. Forest soils. Springer, Dordrecht. 2013; Chapter 5:49-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02541-4_4

Jamil N, Naheed S, Humaira A, Zubia M, Zahoor AB, Rukhsana K et al. Physical and chemical properties of soil quality indicating forests productivity. A review: American-Eurasian Journal of Toxicological Sciences. 2016; 8(2):60-68.

Hendrayanto NM, Arifjaya O, Rusdiana B, Wasis P. Respon hidrologi daerah aliran sungai (DAS) berhutan jati (Tectona grandis) Studikasus di DAS Cijuray KPH Purwakarta Perum Perhutani Unit III Jawa Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika. 2001;7(2):7-18.

Brady NC, Weil RR. The nature and properties of soils, Upper Addle River NJ: Prentice Hall. 2008; 13: 662-710.

Zhang H. Cause and effects of soil acidity oklahoma cooperative extension fact sheets; 2017. available at: http://osufacts.okstate.edu 2017.

Brusseau ML, Pepper IL, Charles GP. Reclamation and restoration of disturbed systems, environmental and pollution science, Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00020-3

Goulding KW. Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil use and Management. 2016;32(3):390-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12270

Saikh H, Varadachari C, Ghosh K. Effects of deforestation and cultivation on soil CEC and contents of exchangeable bases: A case study in Simlipal National Park, India. Plant and Soil. 1998; 204:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004323426199

Wahyudi I, Mansur A, Pamoengkas I, Prijanto . Growth of plantation and residual trees on the intensified indonesian selective cutting and planting. Case study in PT Gunung Meranti Forest Concession Area, Central Kalimantan Province [dissertation]. Bogor 2011, Graduate School of Bogor Agricultural University.

Rhoades CC, Eckert EG, Coleman CD. Soil carbon differences among forest, agriculture and secondary vegetation in lower montane Ecuador. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(2):497-505. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0497:SCDAFA]2.0.CO;2

Anas M, Liao F, Verma KK, Sarwar MA, Mahmood A, Chen ZL, Li Q, Zeng XP, Liu Y, Li YR. Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Biol Res. 2020;53:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4.

Owen JS, Wang MK, Sun HL, King HB, Wang CH, Chuang CF. Comparison of soil nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in a mixed grassland and forested ecosystem in central Taiwan. Plant and Soil. 2003; 251(1):167-74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022980731416

Lakudzala DD. Potassium response in some Malawi soils. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron, 2013;8(2): 175-81. https://doi.org/10.56431/p-i012df

Laekemariam F, Kibret K, Shiferaw H. Potassium (K) -to-magnesium (Mg) ratio, its spatial variability and implications to potential Mg-induced K deficiency in Nitisols of Southern Ethiopia. Agric and Food Secur. 2018; 7:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0165-5.

Cakmak I, Yazici AM. Magnesium: A Forgotten element in crop production. Better Crop. 2010;94:23-25.

Gransee A, Führs H. Magnesium mobility in soils as a challenge for soil and plant analysis, magnesium fertilization and root uptake under adverse growth conditions. Plant Soil. 2013; 368:5-21. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1567-y.

Bumb BL. Global fertilizer perspective, 1960-95. Muscle Shoals, AL, USA: International Fertilizer Development Center; 1989; Technical Bulletin T-34, T-35.

Paul LG, Vlek, Kuhne R, Denich M. Nutrient resources for crop production in the tropics [and Discussion]. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 1997; 352(1356):975-85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/56540 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0076

Mengel K, Hütsch B, Kane Y. Nitrogen fertilizer application rates on cereal crops according to available mineral and organic soil nitrogen. Eur J Agron. 2006; 24:343-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.12.001

Voortman R, Bindraban PS. Beyond N and P: toward a Land Resource Ecology Perspective and Impactful Fertilizer Interventions in Sub-saharan Africa. VFRC Report 2015/1Virtual Fertilizer Research Center, Washington DC, USA. 2015; 49.

Monreal CM, DeRosa M, Mallubhotla SC, Bindraban PS, Dimkpa CO. Nanotechnologies for increasing the crop use efficiency of fertilizer-micronutrients Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2016; 52 (3):423-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1073-5

Rengel Z, Batten GG, Crowley DE. Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crop. Res. 1999; 60:27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00131-2

Pathak H, Jain N, Bhatia A, Kumar A, Chatterjee D. Improved nitrogen management: A key to climate change adaptation and mitigation. Indian J Fertil. 2016;12:151-62.

Published

13-05-2023

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Singh IR, Nair PN. Evaluation of physicochemical properties with the availability of plant nutrients in forests and crop farms in different Fijian provinces. Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2023 May 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];. Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/2261

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.