Evaluation of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet cultivars in different sowing times and transplanting and direct-seeding systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2501Keywords:
Cultivar, Dorotea, Planting system, Root yieldAbstract
To study the characteristics of sugar beet cultivars in transplanting and direct-seeding systems on three different sowing times (March 29, April 8, and April 18), a split plot experiment based on randomized complete blocks in three replications was carried out in Miandoab and Bokan regions, Northwest of Iran in 2016. The results showed that the highest nitrogen content was observed between the two test locations in the Bukan area. Results showed that the low root sodium, alkalinity, and molasses content was recorded for transplanting system. The minimum content of root sodium, nitrogen, and molasses sugar was observed in the plants sown on March 29. The Dorotea cultivar showed the highest root yield, sugar yield, and white sugar yield and the lowest root nitrogen and molasses sugar content compared to Isabella and Ekbatan. The highest white sugar content, coefficient of sugar extraction, sugar yield, root yield, and white sugar yield were recorded in the transplanting system with the sowing time of March 29; however, the highest content of root potassium and sugar content was observed in the transplanting system sown on April 18. The highest root yield was observed in the Dorotea cultivar, with a sowing time of March 29. Among the locations in the cultivar and planting system interaction treatments, the highest sugar content was found in the Bukan area's Dorotea cultivar in the transplanting system. Finally, the highest sugar yield was related to the transplanting system on March 29 in the Bukan area. It can be stated that an early sowing time (March 29), transplanting, and Dorotea variety were identified as the most appropriate treatments to improve the economic traits of sugar beet.
Downloads
References
Mohammadi-Ahmadmahmoudi E, Deihimfard R, Noori O. Yield gap analysis simulated for sugar beet-growing areas in waterlimited environments. Eur J Agron. 2020;113:125988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.125988
FAO. Extent and causes of salt–affected soils in participating countries; 2017. Available on URL from : http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/agll/spuch/topic4.htm(Website)
Caliskan ME, Isler N, Gunel E, Guler MB. The effects of sowing date and row spacing on yield and quality of some sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties in Hatay ecological conditions. Turk J Agric Forest. 1999;23:1119-24.
Ozel A, Ozguven M. Effect of different planting times on essential oil components of different mint (Mentha spp.) varieties. Turk J Agric. 2002;26:289-94.
Salmasi SZ, Golez KG, Moghbeli S. Effect of sowing date and limited irrigation on the seed yield and quality of dill (Anethum graveolens L.). Turk J Agric. 2006;30:281-86.
Hocking PJ, Stapper M. Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat and nitrogen fertilizer on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield and yield components. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52:623-34. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00113
Robertson MJ, Holland JF, Bambach R. Response of canola and Indian mustard to sowing date in the grain belt of North-Eastern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric. 2004;44:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02214
Uzun B, Zengin U, Furat S, Akdesir O. Sowing date effects on growth, flowering, oil content and seed yield of canola cultivar. Asian J Chem. 2009;21:1957-65.
Leilah AA, Nasr SM. Agronomy of sugarbeet cultivation-A review. 5th Conference of Agronomy. Zagazig. 13-15 September. 1992; (2):970-79.
Badawi MA, El-Agroudy MA, Attia AN. Effect of planting date on yield and sugar content of sugar beet cultivars grown in Cradock, Eastern Cape. J Agric Sci. 1995;20(6):2683-89.
Olesen JE, Fenhann J (ed.), Larsen H (ed.), Mackenzie GA (ed.), Rasmussen B. Assessing impact of climatic change on crop production using growth models. Environmental models: emissions and consequences.1990;139-47.
Draycott AP. Sugar Beet, First Edition, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. 2006;474 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751114
Zagorulko YY, Zagorulko EY. Features of hyaluronic acid solutions for intra-articular introduction and recent trends in their development (review). Drug Dev Regist. 2020;9(2):45-54. https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2020-9-2-45-54
Lamichhane JR, Boiffin J, Boizard H, Dürr C, Richard G. Seedbed structure of major field crops as affected by cropping systems and climate: Results of a 15-year field trial. Soil Tillage Res. 2021;206:104845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104845
Lamichhane JR, Constantin J, Aubertot JN, Dürr C. Will climate change affect sugar beet establishment of the 21st century? Insights from a simulation study using a crop emergence model. Field Crops Res. 2019;238:64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.022
Yuhin IP. Development history and main scientific research results on sugar beet in Bashkortostan. Ufa: Mir Pechati; 2014.
Enikiev RI, Islamgulov DR. Influence of sowing dates on productivity and technological qualities of sugar beet root crops in the middle Urals. Sugar Beet. 2019;10:25-28.
Lauer JG. Plant density and nitrogen rate effects on sugar beet yield and quality early in harvest. Agron J. 1995;87:586-91. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700030032x
Brown M, Perez J, Miles A. Teaching Organic Farming and Gardening, Center for Agro Ecology and Sustainable Food Systems, third ed. University of California, Santa Cruz; 2015.
Haghighikhah M, Khajeh-Hosseini M, Nassiri-Mahallat M, Khavari-Khorasan S. The effect of seed priming and transplanting on morphological characteristics yield and yield components of super sweet corn. J Agroecol. 2017; 8(4):628-43. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v8i4.31250
Khozaeia M, Akbar Kamgar Haghighia A, Zand Parsaa S, Sepaskhaha AR, Razzaghia F, Yousefabadic V, Emam Y. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agric Water Manag. 2020;238:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106230
Cook D, Scott R. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice, Champan and Hall Press, New York, USA; 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0373-9
Karbalaei S, Mehraban A, Mobasser HR, Bitarafan Z. Sowing date and transplant root size effects on transplanted sugar beet in spring planting. Ann Biol Res. 2012;3(7):3474-78.
Enikiev R, Islamgulov D, Kamilanov A, Alimgafarov R, Akhiyarov B. Effects of sowing dates on technological qualities of sugar beets grown in middle CIS-Urals. Agric EngInt: CIGR Journal. 2022;24(3):226-33.
Qasim ZS, Al-Rawi KM. A study on the effect of planting date on yield, sucrose percentage and purity of twenty-six commercial varieties of sugar beet. Mesopotamia J Agric. 1971;7:3-11.
Tahisin S, Hali A. Plant density and sowingdate effects on sugar beet yield and quality. J Agron. 2004;3(3):215-18.
Abyaneh HZ, Jovzi M, Albaji M. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation, partial root drying and N-fertilizer levels on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L.). Agric Water Manag. 2022;194:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.016
Ivanak VT, Toth SM, Arfincic M. Effect of harvesting date on the yield of roots and sugar of sown and transplanting sugar beet cultivars. Field Crop. 1990;43:90-115.
Theurer FC, Doney DL. Transplanted versus direct seed sugar beet. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol. 1980;20(5):503-16. https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.20.5.503
Heath MC, Cleal RA. Transplanting date and pot length for sugar beet. Transplanting in UK Asp Appl Biol. 1992;32:135-40.
Kazemin Khah K. The effects of transplanting time on the quality and quantity of paper pot cultivation of sugar beet in the salin soils of east Azarbaijan province. J Agric Sci. 2005;15(1):203-12.
Hoffman CM, T Huijbregts N, Van-Swaaij Jansen R. Impact of differen environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. J Exp Biol Agric Sci. 2009;30(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.30.1.17
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 02-10-2023 (2)
- 02-09-2023 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Shahrokh Pahlavanian Miandoab, Mohammad Reza Dadashi, Touraj Mir Mahmoudi, Asiyeh Siahmargue, Hossen Adjam Norouzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
