Analysis of economic benefits and energy value of intercropping Stropharia rugosoannulata under rubber forests in Hainan Province of China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3522Keywords:
Benefit analysis, Under-forest economy, Rubber, Stropharia rugosoannulata, IntercroppingAbstract
To stabilize China's rubber planting area and maintain the security of China's natural latex supply as a strategic material, developing the cultivation of edible fungi under rubber forests is considered an effective solution. However, the proportion of suitable substrate for cultivating edible fungi under forests has not been clearly defined. The lack of clarity in economic and energy utilization efficiency hinders the promotion and development of the under-forest cultivation mode of edible fungi. In this study, we investigated the yield performance of Stropharia rugosoannulata cultivated under the forest using 9 different cultivation proportions. Additionally, we examined the economic and energy efficiency by calculating the input and output of each cultivation proportion, with S. rugosoannulata as the target. The results showed that proportion F (rubber sawdust: rice straw: rice chaff = 3:3:2) made full use of local agroforestry wastes. This proportion not only achieved the highest yield (8.51 kg m-2) but also had the highest economic value, reaching 21.57 CNY m-2. Therefore, it is the most suitable for widespread cultivation under the forest. This study provides reliable theoretical support for the rubber-fungus model while enhancing the rubber forest economy.
Downloads
References
Hainan provincial market supervision and administration bureau [Internet]. Natural Rubber Industry Standard System of Hainan Province; 2023 Aug 15 [cited 2023 Nov. 29]. Available from: https://amr.hainan.gov.cn/zw/gsgg/qtgsgg/202308/t20230815_3475479.html
Chen J, Zhang D, Chen Z, Li Z, Cai Z. Effect of agricultural social services on green production of natural rubber: Evidence from Hainan, China. Sustainability. 2022;14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114138
Ministry of agriculture and rural affairs of the people's republic of China [Internet]. Hainan Natural Rubber News; 2022 Apr. 13 [cited 2023 Nov. 29]. Available from: http://www.moa.gov.cn/ztzl/ymksn/xhsbd/202204/t20220415_6396441.htm
Juan L, Wei FL. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on the growth and nutrient utilization of calla lily intercropped with rubber trees. Soil and Tillage Research. 2021;211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105031
Huang W, Wachemo AC, Yuan H, Li X. Full utilization of nutrients in rice straw by integrating mushroom cultivation, biogas production and fertilizer use. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2019;12(4):17483. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191204.4658
Huang L, He C, Si C, Shi H, Duan J. Nutritional, bioactive and flavor components of giant Stropharia (Stropharia rugosoannulata): A review. Journal of Fungi. 2023;9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080792
Tang S, Fan T, Jin L, Lei P, Shao C, Wu S et al. Soil microbial diversity and functional capacity associated with the production of edible mushroom Stropharia rugosoannulata in croplands. Peerj. 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14130
Gong S, Chen C, Zhu J, Qi G, Jiang S. Effects of wine-cap Stropharia cultivation on soil nutrients and bacterial communities in forestlands of Northern China. Peerj. 2018;6. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5741
Sun Y. Environmental regulation, agricultural green technology innovation and agricultural green total factor productivity. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022 Oct 18;10:955954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955954
Tyner WE, Herath N. Energy economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2018;40(1):174-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx050
Yu Y, Jiang TY, Li SQ, Li XL, Gao DC. Energy-related CO2 emissions and structural emissions' reduction in China's agriculture: An input-output perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124169
Yuan S, Peng SB. Trends in the economic return on energy use and energy use efficiency in China's crop production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;70:836-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.264
Zhai NN, Mao CL, Feng YZ, Zhang T, Xing ZJ, Wang YH et al. Current status and future potential of energy derived from Chinese agricultural land: A review. Biomed Research International. 2015;2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/824965
Hedau NK, Tuti MD, Stanley J, Mina BL, Agrawal PK, Bisht JK et al. Energy-use efficiency and economic analysis of vegetable cropping sequences under greenhouse condition. Energy Efficiency. 2014;7(3):507-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9239-1
Tabatabaie SMH, Rafiee S, Keyhani A, Ebrahimi A. Energy and economic assessment of prune production in Tehran province of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013;39:280-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-013-9239-1
Ozkan B, Ceylan RF, Kizilay H. Energy inputs and crop yield relationships in greenhouse winter crop tomato production. Renewable Energy. 2011;36(11):3217-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.042
Jin Z, Liao W, Mu Y, Li Y, Nie L. Integrated assessment of water footprint and energy production efficiency in different rice-rape rotation systems. Energy. 2023;266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126535
Xiong JY, Chen QJ, Zhang GQ. Effects of sawdust and agricultural straw on the mycelial growth of Stropharia rugosoannulata. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture. 2023;38:16-22. https://doi.org/10.13473/j.cnki.issn.1002-3186.2023.0304.
Zhang YB, Ji CH, Cao QM, Chen B, Lin YP, Chen X et al. Tropical agricultural science of water-saving irrigation rubber-bacterial intercropping high-yield model. Tapping Rubber Plantation. 2012;32:15-20+24. https://doi.org/10.2196/j.cnki.46-1038.2012.32.06
Guo M, Ma X, Zhou Y, Bian Y, Liu G, Cai Y et al. Genome sequencing highlights the plant cell wall degrading capacity of edible mushroom Stropharia rugosoannulata. Journal of Microbiology. 2023;61(1):83-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-022-00003-7
Shen M, Quan XH, Yang JY, Yuan Y, Wang RS, Zheng QP. Effects of different sawdust addition ratios on the growth and yield of Stropharia rugosoannulata. Chinese Edible Fungi. 2022;41:27-33. https://doi.org/10.13629/j.cnki.53-1054.2022.08.006
Tian D, Zhang M, Zhao A, Wang B, Shi J, Feng J. Agent-based modeling and simulation of edible fungi growers? adoption behavior towards fungal chaff recycling technology. Agricultural Systems. 2021;190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103138
Domondon DL, He W, De Kimpe N, Hofte M, Poppe J. Beta-adenosine, a bioactive compound in grass chaff stimulating mushroom production. Phytochemistry. 2004;65(2):181-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.11.004
Prajapat K, Vyas AK, Dhar S, Jain NK, Hashim M, Choudhary GL. Energy input-output relationship of soybean-based cropping systems under different nutrient supply options. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2018;39(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/39/1/MRN-451
Hussain Z, Khan MA, Irfan M. Water energy and economic analysis of wheat production under raised bed and conventional irrigation systems: A case study from a semi-arid area of Pakistan. Soil and Tillage Research. 2010;109(2):61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.04.007
Wang H, Ren H, Han K, Li G, Zhang L, Zhao Y et al. Improving the net energy and energy utilization efficiency of maize production systems in the North China plain. Energy. 2023;274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127340
Alluvione F, Moretti B, Sacco D, Grignani C. EUE (energy use efficiency) of cropping systems for a sustainable agriculture. Energy. 2011;36(7):4468-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.075
Pokhrel A, Soni P. Performance analysis of different rice-based cropping systems in tropical region of Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;197:70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.035
Zangeneh M, Omid M, Akram A. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy. 2010;35(7):2927-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.024
Eskandari H, Attar S. Energy comparison of two rice cultivation systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;42:666-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.050
Canakci M, Topakci M, Akinci I, Ozmerzi AJEc, Management. Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya region, Turkey. 2005;46(4):655-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.04.008
De D, Singh R, Chandra HJAe. Technological impact on energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. 2001;70(3):193-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(01)00035-6
Hetz EJJAMiA, Africa, America. L. Energy utilization in Chilean agriculture. 1992;23(2):52-56. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=caba3&NEWS=N&AN=19922454481
Royan M, Khojastehpour M, Emadi B, Mobtaker HG. Investigation of energy inputs for peach production using sensitivity analysis in Iran. Energy Conversion and Management. 2012;64:441-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.07.002
Ucar K, Engindeniz S, Oruk G. Energy and profitability analysis of dried apricot production in terms of sustainability: A case study for Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 2023;65(3):461-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00847-2
Gokdogan O, Erdogan O, Eralp O, Zeybek A. Energy efficiency analysis of cotton production in turkey: A case study from Aydin province. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2016;25(11):4959-64. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2016.16.2.12857
Angnes G, de Almeida BO, Milan M, Romanelli TL. Energy and economic performances of stump and roots removal of eucalyptus for bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021;153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.10622938. Menucelli JR, Amorim EP, Menezes Freitas ML, Zanata M, Cambuim J, Teixeira de Moraes ML et al. Potential of Hevea brasiliensis clones, Eucalyptus pellita and Eucalyptus tereticornis wood as raw materials for bioenergy based on higher heating value. Bioenergy Research. 2019;12(4):992-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10041-6
Chen G, Du G, Ma W, Yan B, Wang Z, Gao W. Production of amorphous rice husk ash in a 500 kW fluidized bed combustor. Fuel. 2015;144:214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.012
Zhang YC, Luo M, Fang XY, Zhang FQ, Cao MH. Metabolism and nutrition energy value of rice, broken rice and rice bran for broiler chickens by the regression method. Poultry Science. 2021;100(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.069
Li Z, Li Y, Lv Z, Liu H, Zhao J, Noblet J et al. Net energy of corn, soybean meal and rapeseed meal in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0169-1
Mohammadi A, Omid M. Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy. 2010;87(1):191-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.021
Baris K, Kucukali S. Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energy Policy. 2012;42:377-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.002
Wagner M, Lippe M, Lewandowski I, Salzer M, Cadisch G. CO2 footprint of the seeds of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) as a biodiesel feedstock source. Forests. 2018;9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090548
Yu Q, Guo M, Zhang B, Wu H, Zhang Y, Zhang L. Analysis of nutritional composition in 23 kinds of edible fungi. Journal of Food Quality. 2020;2020:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8821315
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-07-2024 (2)
- 26-06-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jingyun Tian, Wanjie Liao, Mohammad Nauman Khan, Shizhao Cheng, Ruilong Zou, Qian Li, Ye Tao, Lixiao Nie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
