The role of Garo tribes of Meghalaya (India) in the conservation and management of medicinal plants diversity used in treating livestock diseases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2018.5.4.416Keywords:
Chinawood, Endangered, Ethnoveterinary, Traditional healers, West Garo HillsAbstract
The Garo tribe of Meghalaya, India have rich local health traditions and large numbers of traditional healers have been practicing herbal medicines for many years. The present study aims at quantifying the plant species used for ethno-veterinary purposes and to identify their conservation status. Out of 90 informants 22 were traditional healers and 68 were farmers. A total of 75 ethnoveterinary medicinal plant species belonging to 71 genera and 49 families were documented and identified for treating 24 different livestock ailment. Most of the medicinal plants (83%) were collected from the wild and leaves were the most frequently used (58%) parts for formulation of drugs; oral application is most frequently employed (56%), followed by the dermal application which accounts for 31%. The medicinal plants collected are mostly trees (31%), followed by herbs (25%). The study indicates that some species are rare or endangered and their use is therefore unsustainable. The strategies for effective conservation of endangered medicinal plant are discussed here.
Downloads
References
2. Asolkar L V, Kakkar K K, Charke O J. Second supplement to glossary of Indian medicinal plants with active principles Part-I (A-K) (1965–1981) New Delhi, India: Publication and Information Directorate (CSIR); 1992.
3. Jain S K. Dictionary of Indian folk Medicine and Ethnobotany. Deep Publications, New Delhi; 1991.
4. Das T, Samajdar T, Islam M, Singh N A, Marak G. Traditional farming system: A Case Study of Garo Tribe in West Garo Hills District of Meghalaya, North-Eastern India. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 2016; 8(50):2140-2145.
5. Kharbuli B, Syiem D, Kayang H. Biodiversity: North East India Perspectives. North Eastern Biodiversity Research Cell, Shillong, Meghalaya, India; 1999.
6. Tiwari B K, Tynsong H. Biodiversity Enriching and Livelihood Enhancing Practice of NTFP, MP and MAP Management of War Khasi of Meghalaya, India. Final Technical Report. IDRC-MAPPA Project, Centre for Environmental Studies, NEHU, Shillong; 2004.
7. Rao R R. Ethnobotanical study of the flora of Meghalaya: Some reports of herbal medicines. Jain S. K. (Ed) Glimpses of Indian Ethnobotany Oxford IBH Publishing co. New Delhi; 1981. Pp:137–146.
8. Dolui A K, Sharma H K, Marein T B, Lalhriatpuii T. Folk herbal remedies of Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 2004; 3:58–64.
9. Sangma D B, Manohara T N. Ethnoveterinary practices of Garo tribes from West Garo Hills district of Meghalaya, India: perspective and future prospects. Journal of Traditional and Folk Practices 2017; 5(2):21–36.
10. Awas T. Plant Diversity in Western Ethopia: Ecology, Ethnobotany and Conservation. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway; 2007.
11. District statistical Handbook. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong; 2014.
12. State at a glance: Meghalaya, 2016. http://gbpihedenvis.nic.in/State_at_glance/Meghalaya%20Glance/Meghalaya_at_a_glance.pdf.
13. Tariq A, Mussarat S, Adnan M, AbdElsalam N M, Ullah R, Khan A L. Ethnoveterinary Study of Medicinal Plants in a Tribal Society of Sulaiman Range. The Scientific World Journal 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/127526.
14. Tariq A, Adnan M, Mussarat S. Use of Ethnoveterinary Medicines by the People Living Near Pak-Afghan Border Region. Slovenian Veterinary Research 2016; 53(3): 119 – 30.
15. Haridasan K, Rao R R. Forest flora of Meghalaya, Vol 1 & 2. Bishen Singh Mahendrapal Singh: Dehradun; 1985-1987.
16. Nayar M P, Sastry A R K. Red data book of Indian plants. Vol. I. Howrah, Botanical Survey of India, 1988.
17. Nayar M P, Sastry A R K. Red data book of Indian plants. Vol. I. Howrah, Botanical Survey of India, 1989.
18. Nayar M P, Sastry A R K. Red data book of Indian plants. Vol. I. Howrah, Botanical Survey of India, 1990.
19. Martin J. Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Chapman and Hall, London; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2496-0
20. Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healer’s Consensus and Cultural Importance. Social Science and Medicine 1998; 47:1863–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00181-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
