Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

In-silico characterization and expression profiling of cut flower vase life-related genes of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4970
Submitted
6 September 2024
Published
10-04-2025 — Updated on 15-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

In the present study, concentrations of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and salicylic acid (SA) were used to improve the vase life of tuberose cut flowers of varieties viz. Prajwal and Hyderabad Single. Three gene homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana, namely gigantea (GI) (GJVA01042594.1), UDP-glycosyl transferase superfamily protein (UGT) (GGEA01012182.1) and galactose oxidase/ kelch repeat superfamily protein (ZTL) (GGEA01001846.1), have been identified using in silico tools, that have the role in regulating vase life in tuberose flowers. These 3 gene homologs were also characterized using in silico tools. Thereafter, expression profiling of these genes along with the 2 housekeeping genes, viz., actin and ATP synthase E-subunit (ATP SE), has been performed in selected tuberose varieties under different concentration regimes of SNP and SA. Vase life-related genes GI and UGT expressed at optimum concentrations of SNP and SA in both varieties, whereas ZTL showed no expression. In our knowledge, this is the first report that may be harnessed by future researchers to enhance the vase life, including the quality of tuberose-cut flowers. The expression of these genes assumed to be activated in the presence of SNP and SA indicates their utility in the floriculture industry to enhance the vase life of cut flowers.

References

  1. Kumar M, Chaudhary V, Kumar M, Sirohi U, Yadav MK. Application of conventional and mutation approaches in genetic improvement of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.): A review on recent development and future perspectives. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2021;14(3):277–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.03.2021.1
  2. Mandal M, Maitra S, Mahata D. Production technology of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cultivation. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7:2360–64.
  3. Abbas F, Zhou, Y, O’Neill RD, Alam I, Ke Y, Wang HC. Aroma components in horticultural crops: chemical diversity and usage of metabolic engineering for industrial applications. Plants. 2023;12(9):1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091748
  4. Feng M, Zhang M, Adhikari B, Chang L. Novel strategies for enhancing quality stability of edible flower during processing using efficient physical fields: A review. Food Chem. 2024;139077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139077
  5. Edrisi B, Payame D. Effect of nitrogen and plant spacing on nutrients uptake, yield and growth of tuberose (Polianthes tuberose L.). J Ornam Hortic Plants. 2009;2(1):45–54.
  6. Vehniwal SS, Abbey L. Cut flower vase life – influential factors, metabolism and organic formulation. Hortic Int J. 2019;3(6):275–81. https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2019.03.00142
  7. Da Silva J. The cut flower: postharvest considerations. Online J Biol Sci. 2003;3:406–42. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2003.406.442
  8. Kumar R, Yadav MK, Shankar BA, Sharma S, Rani R. Effect of different chemicals to enhance vase life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cut flowers. Int J Agric Stat Sci. 2022;18(1):995–1002. https://connectjournals.com/03899.2022.18.995
  9. Zamani S, Kazemi M, Aran M. Postharvest life of cut rose flowers as affected by salicylic acid and glutamin. World Appl Sci J. 2011;12(9):1621–24.
  10. Naing AH, Lee K, Arun M, Lim KB, Kim CK. Characterization of the role of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) involved in long vase life of different carnation cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17:149–59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1097-0
  11. Kumar R, Yadav MK, Kumar M, Vaishali, Kumar P, Gangwar LK, et al. Effect of different concentrations of Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP) and Salicylic Acid (SA) on vase life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv Prajwal. Environ Ecol. 2023;41(1):45–52.
  12. Sharma AK, Yadav MK, Kumar M, Sengar RS, Gangwar LK, Kumar R. Improvement in vase life of gladiolus cut flowers using different holding solutions of sodium nitroprusside and of salicylic acid. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(1):211–24. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i1693
  13. Seyf M, Khalighi A, Mostofi Y, Naderi R. Effect of sodium nitroprusside on vase life and postharvest quality of a cut rose cultivar (Rosa hybrida ‘Utopia’). J Agric Sci. 2012;4:12–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n12p174
  14. Dwivedi SK, Arora A, Singha VP, Sairama R, Bhattacharya RC. Effect of sodium nitroprusside on the differential activity of antioxidants and expression of SAGs in relation to vase life of gladiolus cut flowers. Sci Hortic. 2016;210:158–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.024
  15. Madhavan J, Jayaswal P, Singh KBM, Rao U. Identification of putative flowering genes and transcription factors from flower de novo transcriptome dataset of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.). Data Brief. 2018;20:2027–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.051
  16. Wang B, Jin SH, Hu HQ, Sun YG. UGT87A2, an Arabidopsis glycosyltransferase, regulates flowering time via flowering locus C. New Phytol. 2012;194:666–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04107.x
  17. Park HJ, Kim WY, Yun DJ. A role for GIGANTEA: keeping the balance between flowering and salinity stress tolerance. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8:820–26. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.24820
  18. Song YH, Estrada DA, Johnson RS, Kim SK, Lee SY, MacCoss MJ, et al. Distinct roles of FKF1, GIGANTEA and ZEITLUPE proteins in the regulation of CONSTANS stability in Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(49):17672–77. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415375111
  19. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
  20. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(2):2725–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  21. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(1):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427
  22. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20(9):374–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89080-5
  23. Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L. Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem. 1987;163(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90086-8
  24. Jayanthi M, Gantasala NP, Papolu PK, Banakar P, Kumari C, Rao U. Identification and evaluation of internal control genes for gene expression studies by real-time quantitative PCR normalization in different tissues of Tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa). Sci Hortic. 2015;194:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.042
  25. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115-e115. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks596
  26. Kibbe WA. OligoCalc: an online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(suppl_2):43–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm234
  27. Piri M, Jabbarzadeh Z. The effect of foliar application of salicylic acid, spermidine and sodium nitroprusside on some growth and flowering characteristics, photosynthetic pigments and vase life of Lisianthus ‘Mariachi Blue’. J Hortic Sci. 2023;36(4):917–36. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2022.74334.1118
  28. Shabanian S, Nasr EM, Karamian R, Phan TL. Physiological and biochemical modifications by postharvest treatment with sodium nitroprusside extend vase life of cut flowers of two gerbera cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2018;137:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.11.009
  29. Ashouri VM, Nalousi AM. Effect of nitric oxide on postharvest quality and vase life of cut carnation flower. J Ornam Plants. 2013;3(3):183–90.
  30. Rio DLA, Corpas FJ, Barroso JB. Nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthase activity in plants. Phytochem. 2004;65:783–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.02.001
  31. Sankhla N, Kay MWA, Davis TD. Effect of nitric oxide generating compounds on flower senescence in cut racemes of pink flowered Lupinus havardii Wats. In: Proceedings of Plant Growth Regulation. Society of America-Annual Meeting; 2005. 32:126–32.
  32. Bleecker AB. Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:41–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.1
  33. Van DWG, Woltering EJ. Physiology and molecular biology of petal senescence. J Exp Bot. 2008;59:453-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm356
  34. Wang L, Zhang F, Qiao H. Chromatin regulation in the response of ethylene: nuclear events in ethylene signaling. Small Methods. 2020;4:190–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900288
  35. Zhang F, Wang L, Qi B, Zhao B, Ko EE, Riggan ND, Qiao H. EIN2 mediates direct regulation of histone acetylation in the ethylene response. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(38):10274–79. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707937114
  36. Zhang F, Wang L, Ko EE, Shao K, Qiao H. Histone deacetylases SRT1 and SRT2 interact with ENAP1 to mediate ethylene induced transcriptional repression. Plant Cell. 2018;30:153-66. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00671
  37. Wang L, Zhang Z, Zhang F, Shao Z, Zhao B. EIN2- directed histone acetylation requires EIN3-mediated positive feedback regulation in response to ethylene. Plant Cell. 2021;33:322?37. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaa029
  38. Verlinden S, Boatright J, Woodson WR. Changes in ethylene responsiveness of senescence-related genes during carnation flower development. Physiol Plant. 2002;116:503-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160409.x
  39. David KM, Armbruster U, Tama N, Putterill J. Arabidopsis GIGANTEA protein is post-transcriptionally regulated by light and dark. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:1193–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.016
  40. Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H. Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2255–70. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033464
  41. Park DH, Somers DE, Kim YS, Choy YH, Lim HK, Soh MS. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Sci. 1999;285:1579–82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5433.1579
  42. Robson F, Costa MMR, Hepworth SR, Vizir I, Piñeiro M, Reeves PH. Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001;28:619–31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01163.x
  43. Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Sci. 2004;303:1003–106. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091761
  44. Suárez-López P, Wheatley K, Robson F, Onouchi H, Valverde F, Coupland G. Constans mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2001;410:1116–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/35074138
  45. Baurle I, Dean C. The timing of developmental transitions in plants. Cell. 2006;125:655–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.005
  46. Somers DE, Kim WY, Geng R. The F-box protein ZEITLUPE confers dosage dependent control on the circadian clock, photomorphogenesis and flowering time. Plant Cell. 2004;16(3):769–82. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.016808
  47. Gadkar VJ, Filion M. Validation of endogenous reference genes in Buglossoides arvensis for normalizing RT-qPCR-based gene expression data. Springer Plus. 2015;4:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0952-4
  48. Yang C, Pan H, Liu Y, ZhouX. Stably expressed housekeeping genes across developmental stages in the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. PloS One. 2015;10:e0120833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120833

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.