Comparative study on agricultural extracts for brood management in Indian bees (Apis cerana indica) in tropical ecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5411Keywords:
agricultural extract, egg laying activity, nectar substitutes, pollen substitutes, populationAbstract
The performance of worker bees fed with different agricultural extracts such as nectar and pollen substitutes compared to the naturally fed workers was determined on (Apis cerana indica Fab.) was evaluated using a randomized block design (RBD). The results revealed that the worker bee fed with nectar and pollen substitutes was significantly superior to the naturally fed workers. The maximum consumption of nectar substitutes was 199.7, and 199.5 ml out of 200 ml were observed in T8 (black gram flour + sugar syrup) and T2 (soybean flour + sugar syrup). The maximum consumption (84.5 g) of pollen substitutes, maximum population (35.66/5 cm2), the maximum length of a worker bee (9.73 mm) and the maximum egg-laying capacity (103.5/5 cm2) were observed in T8 (black gram flour + sugar syrup). The minimum population of 29.08/5 cm2 and the minimum egg-laying activity (83.33/5 cm2) was observed in T1 (naturally fed colony), and the minimum length of worker bee of 9.63 mm was observed in T7 (soybean flour + tender coconut). These findings suggest that black gram flour and sugar syrup can significantly enhance colony productivity during dearth periods.
Downloads
References
Jaya Prabhavathi S, Subrahmaniyan K, Senthil Kumar M, Gayathry G, Malathi G. Exploring the antibacterial, anti-bioilm, and anti-quorum sensing properties of honey: a comprehensive review. Agric Arch 2023;2(3): 10-14. https://doi.org/10.51470/AGRI.2023
Ricigliano VA, Williams ST, Oliver R. Effects of different artificial diets on commercial honey bees colony performance, health biomarkers, and gut microbiota. BMC Vet Res. 2022; 18:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03151-5
Kim H, Frunze O, Maigoro AY, Lee ML, Lee JH, Kwon HW. Comparative study of the effect of pollen substitute diets on honey bees during early spring. Insects. 2024; 15(2):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15020101
Marek K, Kamil P, Anna MK, Stanislaw B, Anna CS, Iwona W. Pollen and bee bread as new health-oriented products: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;71:170-80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.021
Dolezal AG, Carrillo-Tripp J, Judd TM, Miller WA, Bonning BC, Toth AL. Interacting stressors matter: diet quality and virus infection in honeybee health. R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6:181803. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181803
Amera WA, Mersso BT, Sisay TA, Arega AB, Alene AT. Effect of various supplements on productive performance of honey bees, in the south Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. Plos One. 2024; 19(5): e0303579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303579
Smith J. Beekeeping in Tropical Climates. ABC Publishers; 2019.
Topal E, Margaoan R, Bay V, Takma C, Yucel B, Oskay D, Duz G, Acar S, Kosoglu M. The Effect of supplementary feeding with different pollens in autumn on colony development under natural environment and in vitro lifespan of honey bees. Insects. 2022;13(7):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13070588
Kim H, Maigoro AY, Lee JH, Frunze O, Kwon HW. The improving effects of probiotic-added pollen substitute diets on the gut microbiota and individual health of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Microorganisms. 2024; 12(8):1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081567
Mortensen AN, Jack CJ, Bustamante TA, Schmehl DR, Ellis JD. Effects of supplemental pollen feeding on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony strength and Nosema spp. Infection. J Econ Entoml. 2019; 112: 60-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy341
Keller I, Fluri P, Imdorf A. Pollen nutrition and colony development in honey bees: part II. Bee World. 2005; 86(2): 27-34.
Bhusal SJ, Thapa RB. Response of colony strength to honey production: regression and correlation analysis. J Inst Agric Anim Sci. 2006;27:133–37. https://doi.org/10.3126/jiaas.v27i0.706
Li C, Xu B, Wang Y, Feng Q, Yang W. Effects of dietary crude protein levels on development, antioxidant status, and total midgut protease activity of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie. 2012; 43:576-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-012-0126-0
Li C, Xu B, Wang Y, Feng Q, Yang W. Protein content in larval diet affects adult longevity and antioxidant gene expression in honey bee workers. Entomol Exp Appl. 2014;151:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12167
Kavimugilan S, Kalyanasundaram A, Ambethgar V. Managing Bee's health during dearth periods: a review of pollen and nectar substitutes for tropical climates. Uttar Pradesh J Zoo. 2024; 45(16):472–89. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2024/v45i164330
Kumari I, Kumar R. Parthenium Hysterophorus and Cyperus Rotundus: alternative sources of food for honeybees during dearth period. Biosci Biotechechnol Res Asia. 2017; 14(3) 1177–80 .
El-sherif ME, Ghazala NE, Youssef LA, Sayed SS. Effect of feeding some diets as a pollen grains supplements during spring season on some 45 activities of honey bee colonies. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci. 2017; 10:181-93.
Pernal SF, Currie RW. The influence of pollen quality on foraging behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Eco Sociobio. 2000; 48(3):152-56.
DeGrandi-Hoffman G, Wardell G, Ahumada-Segura F, Rinderer T, Danka R, Pettis J. Comparisons of pollen substitute diets for honey bees: consumption rates by colonies and effects on brood and adult populations. J Apic Res. 2008;47(4):265–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2008.11101473
Sihag RC, Gupta M. Testing the effects of some pollen substitute diets on colony build up and economics of beekeeping with Apis mellifera L. J Entomol. 2013; 10:120–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/je.2013.120.135
Kumar R, Mishra RC, Agrawal OP. Effect of feeding artificial diets on honey bees during dearth period under Panchkula (Haryana) conditions. J Entomol Res. 2013;37:41–45.
Morais MM, Turcatto AP, Pereira RA, Francoy TM, Guidugli-Lazzarini KR, Gonçalves LS, de Almeida JM, Ellis JD, De Jong D. Protein levels and colony development of Africanized and European honey bees fed natural and artificial diets. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(4):6915-22. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.december.19.10
Saffari AM, Kevan PG, Atkinson JL. Palatability and consumption of patty-formulated pollen and pollen substitutes and their effects on honey bee colony performance. J Apic Sci. 2010; 54(2):63-71.
De Grandi -Hoffman G, Chen Y, Rivera R, Carroll M, Chambers M, Hidalgo G, Watkins de Jong E. Honey bee colonies provided with natural forage have lower pathogen loads and higher overwinter survival than those fed protein supplements. Apidologie. 2016;47(2):186-96.
Herbert EW, Shimanuki H, Caron DM. The brood-rearing capability of caged honey bees fed different pollen substitutes. J Apic Res.1977;16(3):150-53.
Mattila HR, Otis GW. Influence of pollen diet in spring on development of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies. J Econ Entomol. 2006;99(3):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/99.3.604
Kumar Y, Singh M. Effect of colony strength and stimulant sugar–feeding on Apis mellifera. In: Matsuka M, Verma LR, Wongsiri S, Shrestha KK , Pratap U,editors. Asian bees and beekeeping: progress of research and development. Proceedings of fourth asian apicultural association international conference. Kathamandu, 23-28 March 1998. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India; 2000. pp. 102-103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 S Kavimugilan, A Kalyanasundaram, S Jaya Prabhavathi, V Ambethgar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
