Phenotypic, physiological and molecular changes of some wheat varieties under drought stress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5593Keywords:
BADH-1 gene, chlorophyll, drought-PEG6000, gene expression, SOD gene, wheat plantAbstract
Water stress poses a significant challenge to wheat production, adversely affecting both field productivity and grain quality in the face of climate change and diminishing water resources. It reduces vegetative growth and disrupts physiological processes, which negatively impact yield components like grain size and protein content. Consequently, selecting drought-tolerant varieties is critical for enhancing resilience in arid regions. This study examined ten wheat varieties belonging to the genus Triticum aestivum L. (Abba 99, Adna 99, Baraka, Bohooth 10, Bohooth 22, Jihan 99, Bora, Dijla, Sham 6 and Wafia) under three water stress levels: 0 MPa (S0), -1.48 MPa (S1), and -2.95 MPa (S2) using polyethylene glycol (PEG6000). Phenotypic traits measured included plant height, leaf area, stem diameter, wet and dry weight, along with chlorophyll content. Real-time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to assess the expression of SOD and BADH-1 genes. Results indicated that Adana 99 exhibited significant drought resistance, recording the highest measurements in plant height (35 cm), leaf area (15.50 cm²), stem diameter (1.80 mm), wet weight (0.80 g), dry weight (0.55 g) and total chlorophyll content (45.85 and 48.14) at 15 and 30 days, respectively, under S2. The SOD gene expression peaked at 8.57 in S2, an eightfold increase from S0. Similarly, BADH-1 gene expression was recorded at 8 in S2, also an eightfold increase. In contrast, Baraka and Wafia showed the lowest expressions for the SOD (0.001) and BADH-1 (0.002) genes under S2, negatively affecting their phenotypic and physiological traits. These findings underscore the importance of selecting drought-resistant varieties for sustainable productivity under harsh environmental conditions.
Downloads
References
Golla B. Agricultural production system in arid and semi-arid regions. Int J Agric Sci Food Technol. 2024;10(3):45–53. ISSN: 2455-815X
Cruz de Carvalho MH. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3(3):156–65. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.3.5532
You J, Chan Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01092
Basma Aziz Hameed Al-Dami. The interaction between different level of water stress and potassium on growth of wheat plant (Triticum aestivum L.) at booting stage. Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences. 2015;2(4):17–31. https://doi.org/10.59658/jkas.v2i4.30
Tian X, Dong J, Jin S, He H, Yin H, Chen X. Climate change impacts on regional agricultural irrigation water use in semi-arid environments. Agricultural Water Management. 2023;281:108239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108239
Al-Saadoun AB, Al-Qaisi EK, Abdullah AH, Hussein WM, Al-Hosari AA. Determining the degree of kinship of the phenotypic indicators of some Iraqi varieties and Egyptian accessions and knowing their performance. Journal of Plant Production. 2022;13(5):183-87.
FAO. 2023. FAOSTAT, Production Database, accessed in 2023. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
Central Organization for Statistics and Information Technology in Iraq, 2023.
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MB, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin SM, Mahmud JA, et al. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants. 2020;9(8):681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
Ding Z, Ali EF, Elmahdy AM, Ragab KE, Seleiman MF, Kheir AM. Modeling the combined impacts of deficit irrigation, rising temperature and compost application on wheat yield and water productivity. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;244:106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106626
Fraire-Velázquez S, Rodríguez-Guerra R, Sánchez-Calderón L. Abiotic and biotic stress response crosstalk in plants. Abiotic stress response in plants—physiological, biochemical and genetic perspectives. 2011;3–26. https://doi.org/10.5772/23217
Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2010;48(12):909–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.008
Dudziak K, Zapalska M, Börner A, Szczerba H, Kowalczyk K, Nowak M. Analysis of wheat gene expression related to the oxidative stress response and signal transduction under short-term osmotic stress. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):2743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39460-7
Michel BE, Kaufmann MR. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology. 1973;51(5):914–16. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.51.5.914
Hucl P, Baker RJ. Tiller phenology and yield of spring wheat in a semiarid environment. Crop Science. 1989;29(3):631–35. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030014x
Thomas H. The growth responses to weather of simulated vegetative swards of a single genotype of Lolium perenne. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 1975;84(2):333–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960005875X
Oke AM, Osilaechuu AP, Aremu TE, Ojediran JO. Effect of drip irrigation regime on plant height and stem girth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2020. 445(1):012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012016
Khamees SS, Hamdi RF, Faiath SA. Effect of different concentrations of sodium chloride and zinc on some morphological and physiological characters of wheat plant Triticum aestivum L. J Univ Anbar Pure Sci. 2013;7(1). https://doi.org/10.37652/juaps.2013.82756
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-delta deltaCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–08. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Durner EF. Applied plant science experimental design and statistical analysis using SAS® OnDemand for Academics. CABI; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789249927.0000
Schmuller J. Statistical analysis with R for dummies. John Wiley and Sons; 2017.
Jaafar MF, Abdullah AK. Impact of interaction between nano particles and bacterial and amino fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat plant. Plant Archives (09725210). 2020;20(1).
Mahmoud SN. Evaluation of bread wheat Triticum aestivum L. callus genotypes for water stress tolerance using Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). Baghdad Science Journal. 2012;9(3):391–96. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2012.9.3.391-396
Sharma V, Kumar A, Chaudhary A, Mishra A, Rawat S, Shami V, et al. Response of wheat genotypes to drought stress stimulated by PEG. Stresses. 2022;2(1):26–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2010003
Peršic V, Ament A, Antunovic Dunic J, Drezner G, Cesar V. PEG-induced physiological drought for screening winter wheat genotypes sensitivity–integrated biochemical and chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:987702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.987702
Hashim EK, Hassan SF, Abed BA, Flaih HM. Role of flag leaf in wheat yield. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017;48(3):782. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v48i3.392
Hussein MJ, Abdullah AK. Exogenous of silicon and glycine betaine improves salinity tolerance of pepper plants (Capsicum annum L.). Plant Arch. 2019;19:664–72.
He J, Zhao X, Laroche A, Lu ZX, Liu H, Li Z. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00484
Wang G, Yang X, Xue X. Transgenic tobacco with the BADH gene shows enhanced photosynthesis resistance to drought stress induced by PEG-6000. Agronomy. 2024;14(4):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040690
Abdul-Mageed AS, Al-Hashemi HS. Performance of some wheat genotypes at seedling stage to water stress. Iraq J Agric Res. 2017;22(1).
Zhao W, Wu Z, Amde M, Zhu G, Wei Y, Zhou P, et al. Nanoenabled enhancement of plant tolerance to heat and drought stress on molecular response. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2023;71(51):20405–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c06689
Khamees AL-Kareemawi IH, Muhmood AL-Kazzaz AG. Alpha-tocopherol foliar application can alleviate the adverse effect of salinity stress on wheat plant, Triticum aestivum L. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2019;19(2).
Ashraf MF, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;59(2):206–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
Heiba SA, Osman SA, Eldessouky SE, Haiba AA, Ali RT. Genetic and biochemical studies on some Egyptian wheat genotypes under drought stress. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2021;45:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00650-3
Mohammed MY, Al-Hayany EH. The effect of spraying with quercetin in some of the growth characteristics of cow peas (Vigna sinensis) exposed to drought stress. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2020;20.
Qadir SA, Khursheed MQ, Rashid TS, Awla HK. Abscisic acid accumulation and physiological indices in responses to drought stress in wheat genotypes. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019;50(2):705–12.
Hashim EK, Ahmed SA. Of some field traits of wheat to aba under effect of water stress response. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017;48(4):957. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v48i4.353
Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Panneerselvam R, Shao MA. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants–biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2009;29(2):131–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550902859788
Rabiei Z, Pirdashti H, Hosseini SJ. Effect of drought stress on growth parameters and antioxidative activity of coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Inter J Biol Pharm. 2015;4(7):230–43.
Shabala S. Plant stress physiology (book). Wallingford: CABI; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780647296.0000
Fahad MJ, Abdullah AK. The relationship between sulphur dioxide and trehalose and their effect on some biochemical characteristics of tomato plants. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. 2022;19(4):81–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-220107
Foyer CH, Noctor G. Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: Signaling, acclimation and practical implications. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2009;11(4):861–905. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2008.2185
Abdullah AK. The interaction effect of gamma ray and exogenous salicylic acid on antioxidant enzymes activity in safflower Carthamas tinctorius L. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2019;19.
Mishra N, Jiang C, Chen L, Paul A, Chatterjee A, Shen G. Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1110622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1110622
Abd SF, Abdullah AK. Interaction effect of silicon and nitric oxide on the activity of enzyme and non-enzyme antioxidants on tomato plant exposed to cadmium stress. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2020;20(1).
Venkateswarlu B. Abiotic stress in plants – Mechanisms and adaptations. Enfield: Science Publishers; 2011.
Kusvuran S. Influence of drought stress on growth, ion accumulation and antioxidative enzymes in okra genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2012;14(3). https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0106
Chen TH, Murata N. Glycinebetaine: An effective protectant against abiotic stress in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13(9):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.07.006
Wang GP, Zhang XY, Li F, Luo Y, Wang W. Overaccumulation of glycine betaine enhances tolerance to drought and heat stress in wheat leaves in the protection of photosynthesis. Photosynthetica. 2010;48:117–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-010-0017-3
Sleibi AT, Abdullah AK. Molecular signaling and transcription factors under drought stress and micronutrient deficiency in crop development: A article review. Journal Alharf. 2024;20:74–90.

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 28-01-2025 (2)
- 24-01-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A T Sleibi, A K Abdullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).