Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Nano urea reduces chemical fertilizer footprints amidst enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5766
Submitted
13 October 2024
Published
27-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

The experiment was carried out at Dryland Agricultural Research Station, Rangreth of SKUAST-K, Srinagar (Jammu & Kashmir) during the Kharif season of 2022 and 2023. The experiment comprised ten treatment combinations of nano-urea and conventional chemical fertilizers were applied in fodder specialty corn Shalimar fodder maize 1 (SFM-1) over two years and was conducted using Randomized Complete Block Design. The various parameters that were recorded during the study include plant height (cm), leaf stem ratio, green fodder yield (qha-1 ), dry fodder yield (qha-1 ), crude protein content (%) and dry matter content (%). The relative economics of the experiment was also evaluated during the study. The results of the experiment revealed that plant height and leaf stem ratio was recorded higher than the treatment of the recommended dose of fertilizers RDF (N:P:K@120:60:40kg/ha), however this treatment was comparable with 75 % recommended dose of N+Nano@2mL/litre of water, 75 % recommended dose of N+Nano@4mL/litre of water and 75 % recommended dose of N+Nano@6mL/litre of water treatments during both the years of study. The maximum yields of dry, green fodder, crude protein content and green fodder content were also obtained higher by applying the recommended nitrogen dose (RDF) and this was comparable to applying 75 % of the recommended nitrogen dose with nano-urea spray at concentrations of 2 mL L-1 , 4 mL L-1 and 6 mL L-1 of water, as well as applying 50 % of the recommended nitrogen dose with nano-urea spray at 6 mL L-1 of water for green fodder yield. In the second year, the highest green fodder yield and dry fodder yield were observed with the application of RDF, which was at par with the application of 75 % of the RDF with nano-urea for both green and dry fodder yield. These findings suggest that of 25 % of the recommended nitrogen dose could be saved by using two sprays of nano-urea at concentrations of 2 mL L-1 , 4 mL L-1 , or 6 mL L-1 during the first year of experimentation. The results also show that soil application of 25 % - 50 % of chemical nitrogen fertilizer can be skipped thus reducing the negative impacts of chemical fertilizers on the soil environment.

References

  1. 1. Arya RK, Kamboj MC, Kumar S. Performance of medium maturing maize hybrids under Haryana agro-climatic conditions. Forage Res. 2015;41:130–34.
  2. 2. Patel AS, Barevadia TN, Patel MR, Sadhu AC, Parmar HP. Effect of nitrogen and different management practices on growth and seed production of oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res. 2007;4:104–08.
  3. 3. Anonymous. Annual report. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, New Delhi; 2021:1–2.
  4. 4. Anonymous. Annual report. National Accounts Statistics, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
  5. 5. Nduwimana D, Mochoge B, Danga B, Masso C, Maitra S, Gitari H. Optimizing nitrogen use efficiency and maize yield under varying fertilizer rates in Kenya. Int J Biores Sci. 2020;7(2):63–73. https://doi.org/10.30954/2347-9655.02.2020.4
  6. 6. Meena AK, Meena RN, Choudhary K, Devedee AK, Meena K. Neem coated urea (NCU), an efficient nitrogen source for paddy cultivation: A review. Agri Rev. 2021;42(1):111–15. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-1980
  7. 7. Kumar M, Borah AS. Environmental and economic perspectives of nano urea production: A review. Agri Sustain Int J. 2024;2(1):14–17.
  8. 8. Ramalingappa LP, Kumar S, Singh R, Prasad S. Nanostructured urea fertilizer (Nano Urea): A promising approach to sustainable agriculture. Food Sci Rep. 2023;4(5):84–91.
  9. 9. Kumar Y, Tiwari KN, Singh T, Sain NK, Laxmi S, Verma RA, et al. Nano fertilizers for enhancing nutrient use efficiency, crop productivity and economic returns in winter season crops of Rajasthan. Ann Plant Soil Res. 2020;22(4):324–35. https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2020.10001
  10. 10. Anas M, Liao F, Verma KK, Sarwar MA, Mahmood A, Chen ZL, et al. Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Bio Res. 2020;53:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4
  11. 11. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice hall of India private limited. New Delhi; 1973:498
  12. 12. Rajesh H, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Halepyati AS, Hiregoudar S. Growth, yield and economics of sweet corn (Zea mays L. Saccarata) as influenced by foliar sprays of nano fertilizers. J Farm Sci. 2021;34(4):381–85.
  13. 13. Sankar LR, Mishra GC, Maitra S, Barman S. Effect of nano NPK and straight fertilizers on yield, economics and agronomic indices in baby corn (Zea mays L.). Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(2):614–18. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2j.8836
  14. 14. Samui S, Sagar L, Sankar T, Manohar A, Adhikary R, Maitra S, Praharaj S. Growth and productivity of rabi maize as influenced by foliar application of urea and nano-urea. Crop Res. 2022;57(3):136–40. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.019
  15. 15. Kashyap S, Kumar R, Ram H, Kumar A, Basak N, Sheoran P, et al. Quantitative and qualitative response of fodder maize to use of bulk and nano-fertilizers in Northwestern plains of India. Agro. 2023;13(7):1889. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071889
  16. 16. Thakre BB. Nitrogen management in kharif maize (Zea mays L.) with nano urea foliar spray [PhD dissertation], Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.