Growing environments and cultivar selection limits wheat growth and yield potential in Punjab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5785Keywords:
PAR interception, phenology, radiation use efficiency, sowing time, wheat, yield attributesAbstract
Selecting a suitable sowing time and cultivar can play a pivotal role in sustaining wheat productivity in north India while mitigating the influence of climate extremes. Field experiments were conducted in two distinct climatic regions (Ludhiana and Gurdaspur), of Punjab, India to assess the influence of different sowing environments and cultivars on wheat growth and yield. The crop was sown on three dates (early-5 November, mid-20 November and late-5 December) with two popularly grown wheat cultivars (PBW725 and PBW677). The results indicated that mid and late sowing significantly shortened phenological phases compared to early sowing at both study sites. Wheat sown on 5 November accumulated more thermal time, exhibited a greater leaf area index (LAI), intercepted more photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR), and demonstrated superior radiation use efficiency (RUE). Early-sown wheat also produced higher biological yield (BY), grain yield (GY), irrigation water use efficiency and heat use efficiency compared to delayed sowing at both sites. The wheat cultivar PBW725 outperformed PBW677 in terms of phenological duration, yield, thermal time accumulation, IPAR, LAI and RUE at both sites. IPAR and RUE exhibited a strong positive correlation and regression with the periodic dry matter accumulation of wheat. Linear regression revealed that LAImax (maximum LAI) and ?LAI (accumulated LAI) were the best determinants of BY of wheat. These findings highlight the significance of optimizing growing environments and cultivar selection in mitigating climate extremes and sustaining wheat production in the diverse agro-climatic conditions of Punjab.
Downloads
References
Statistical abstract of Punjab 2022. Department of planning, Government of Punjab. Publication [Internet]. 2023;(956):709. Available from: www.esopb.gov.in
Fischer RA. The effect of duration of the vegetative phase in irrigated semi-dwarf spring wheat on phenology, growth and potential yield across sowing dates at low latitude. Field Crop Res. 2016;198:188-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.06.019
Tester M, Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science. 2010;327:818-22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700.
Alghabari F, Lukac M, Jones HE, Gooding MJ. Effect of Rht alleles on the tolerance of wheat grain set to high temperature and drought stress during booting and anthesis. J Agro Crop Sci. 2014;200(1):36-45. https://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jac.12038
Dreccer MF, Barnes LR, Meder R. Quantitative dynamics of stem water soluble carbohydrates in wheat can be monitored in the field using hyperspectral reflectance. Field Crop Res. 2013;159:70-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.01.001
Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta JA, Siddique KHM. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2011;30(6):491-5077. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.615687
Padovan G, Martre P, Semenov MA, Masoni A, Bregaglio S, Ventrella D, et al. Understanding effects of genotype × environment × sowing window interactions for durum wheat in the Mediterranean basin. Field Crop Res. 2020;259:107969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107969
Zheng B, Chenu K, Dreccer FM, Chapman SC. Breeding for the future: What are the potential impacts of future frost and heat events on sowing and flowering time requirements for Australian bread wheat (Triticum aestivium) varieties? Glob Change Biol. 2012;18(9):2899-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02724.x
Montemurro F, Maiorana M. Agronomic practices at low environmental impact for durum wheat in mediterranean conditions. J Plant Nutr. 2015;38:624-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.988356.
Iwanska M, Oleksy A, Dacko M, Skowera B, Oleksiak T, Wójcik-Gront E. Use of classification and regression trees (CART) for analyzing determinants of winter wheat yield variation among fields in Poland. Biom Lett. 2018;55:197-214. https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2018-0013
Ram H, Singh G, Mavi GS, Sohu VS. Accumulated heat unit requirement and yield of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under different crop growing environment in central Punjab. J Agrometeorol. 2012;14(2):147-53. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v14i2.1414
Singh H, Kingra PK, Pal RK, Singh S. Improving heat use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under abiotic stresses in semi-arid and arid agroclimatic conditions of Punjab. Mausam. 2021;72(3):673-80. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v72i3.1319
Honnaiah PA, Sridhara S, Gopakkali P, Ramesh N, Mahmoud EA, Abdelmohsen SAM, et al. Influence of sowing windows and genotypes on growth, radiation interception, conversion efficiency and yield of guar. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(6):3453-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.010
Adak T, Chakravarty NVK, Muthukumar M, Deshmukh PS, Joshi HC, Katiyar RK. Evaluation of biomass and thermal energy utilization efficiency of oilseed Brassica (Brassica juncea) under altered microenvironments. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(5):2254-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.035
Mehta P, Dhaliwal LK. Radiation interception, growth dynamics and agroclimatic indices of wheat under different sowing dates. J Agrometeorol. 2022;24(3):312-15. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i3.1650
Dhakar R, Nagar S, Sehgal VK, Jha PK, Singh MP, Chakraborty D, et al. Balancing water and radiation productivity suggests a clue for improving yields in wheat under combined water deficit and terminal heat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1171479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1171479
Mavi HS, Tiwana DS, Grewal SS, Singh R, Singh B, Singh NT, et al. Agroclimatic regions of Punjab. Research Bulletin. 1979.
Angstrom A. Solar and terrestrial radiation: Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. QJR Meteorol Soc. 1924;50(210):121-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008
Prescott JA. Evaporation from water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans Roy Soc S Aust. 1940;64:114-18.
Anonymous. Package of practices for the crops of Punjab. Vol. 32. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University. 2016; p.18-21.
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974;14(6):415-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Saab TMA, Sellami MH, Giorio P, Basile A, Bonfante A, Rouphael Y, et al. Assessing the potential of cereal production systems to adapt to contrasting weather conditions in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy. 2019;9(393):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070393
Nuttonson MY. Wheat climatic relationship and use of phenology in ascertaining the thermal and photothermal requirements of wheat. In: American Institute of Crop Ecology Washington DC; 1955. p. 388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1292056
Sastry PSN, Chakravarty NVK. Energy summation indices for wheat crop in India. Agric Meteorol. 1982;27(1-2):45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(82)90018-8
McMaster GS, Smika DE. Estimation and evaluation of winter wheat phenology in the central Great Plains. Agric For Meteorol. 1988;43(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(88)90002-0
Hirose T. Development of the Monsi-Saeki theory on canopy structure and function. Ann Bot. 2004;95(3):483-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci047
Szeicz G. Solar radiation for plant growth. J Appl Ecol. 1974;11(2):617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402214
Tripathi A, Pohanková E, Fischer M, Orság M, Trnka M, Klem K, et al. The evaluation of radiation use efficiency and leaf area index development for the estimation of biomass accumulation in short rotation poplar and annual field crops. Forests. 2018;9(4):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040168
Saha S, Sehgal VK, Nagarajan S, Pal M. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on radiation utilization and related plant biophysical properties in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Agric For Meteorol. 2012;(158-159):63- 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.02.003
Pradhan S, Sehgal VK, Bandyopadhyay KK, Panigrahi P, Parihar CM, Jat SL. Radiation interception, extinction coefficient and use efficiency of wheat crop at various irrigation and nitrogen levels in a semi-arid location. Ind J Plant Physiol. 2018;23(3):416-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0400-x
R core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
Coventry DR, Gupta RK, Yadav A, Poswal RS, Chhokar RS, Sharma RK, et al. Wheat quality and productivity as affected by varieties and sowing time in Haryana, India. Field Crop Res. 2011;123(3):214-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.017
Kaur P, Hundal SS. Effect of temperature rise on growth and yield of wheat: A simulation study. Agric Res J. 2007;44(1):6-8.
Tahir S, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Jehanzeb M, Cheema M. Evaluating the impact of seed rate and sowing dates on wheat productivity in semi-arid environment. Int J Agric Biol. 2018;22:57-64. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1033
Ferrise R, Triossi A, Stratonovitch P, Bindi M, Martre P. Sowing date and nitrogen fertilisation effects on dry matter and nitrogen dynamics for durum wheat: An experimental and simulation study. Field Crop Res. 2010;117(2-3):245-57.
Borràs-Gelonch G, Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA, Romagosa I. Genetic control of duration of pre-anthesis phases in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and relationships to leaf appearance, tillering and dry matter accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(1):69-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err230
Roy D, Vashisth A, Krishnan P, Mukherjee J, Meena MC, Biswakarma N, et al. Delayed sowing and its ramifications: Biophysical, yield and quality analysis of wheat cultivars in the northwest Indo-Gangetic plains. J Sci Food Agric. 2024;104(11):6831-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13512
Sun H, Zhang X, Chen S, Pei D, Liu C. Effects of harvest and sowing time on the performance of the rotation of winter wheat–summer maize in the North China plain. Ind Crop and Prod. 2007;25(3):239-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.12.003
Shah F, Coulter A, Ye C, Wu W. Yield penalty due to delayed sowing of winter wheat and the mitigatory role of increased seeding rate. Eur J Agron. 2020;119:126120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126120
Tripathi SC, Mongia AD, Sharma RK, Kharub AS, Chhokar RS. Wheat productivity at different sowing dates in various agroclimatic zones of India. SAARC J Agric. 2005;3:191-201.
Hocking PJ, Stapper M. Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield and yield components. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52(6):623. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00113
Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extrem. 2015;10:4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
Fayed TB, El-Sarag EI, Hassanein MK, Magdy A. Evaluation and prediction of some wheat cultivars productivity in relation to different sowing dates under North Sinai region conditions. Ann Agric Sci. 2015;60(1):11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2014.12.001
Gill KK, Babuta R, Kaur N, Kaur P, Sandhu SS. Thermal requirement of wheat crop in different agroclimatic regions of Punjab under climate change scenarios. Mausam. 2014;65(3):417-24. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v65i3.1052
Maresma A, Chamberlain L, Tagarakis A, Kharel T, Godwin G, Czymmek KJ, et al. Accuracy of NDVI-derived corn yield predictions is impacted by time of sensing. Computer Electron Agric. 2020;169:105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105236
Domingos IFN, Bilsborrow PE. The effect of variety and sowing date on the growth, development, yield and quality of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Eur J Agron. 2021;126:126264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126264
Reddy AA. Pulses production technology: Status and way forward. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009;44:73-80. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1537540
Sun H, Shao L, Chen Y, Zhang X. Effects of sowing time and rate on crop growth and radiation use efficiency of winter wheat in the North China plain. Int J Plant Prod. 2013;7(1):117-38. https://doi.org/10.22069/IJPP.2012.925
Zeleke K, Nendel C. Growth and yield response of faba bean to soil moisture regimes and sowing dates: Field experiment and modelling study. Agric Water Manage. 2019;213:1063-77. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.023
Hamzei J, Soltani J. Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: Effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric, Ecosyst Environ. 2012;155:153-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.003
Mondani F, Khani K, Honarmand SJ, Saeidi M. Evaluating effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the radiation use efficiency and yield of soybean (Glycine max) under water deficit stress condition. Agric Water Manage. 2019;213:707-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.11.004
Confalone A, Lizaso JI, Ruiz-Nogueira B, López-Cedrón FX, Sau F. Growth, PAR use efficiency, and yield components of field-grown Vicia faba L. under different temperature and photoperiod regimes. Field Crop Res. 2010;115(2):140-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.014
Pradhan S, Sehgal VK, Das DK, Jain AK, Bandyopadhyay KK, Singh R, et al. Effect of weather on seed yield and radiation and water use efficiency of mustard cultivars in a semi-arid environment. Agric Water Manage. 2014;139:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.005
Asseng S, Foster I, Turner NC. The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17(3):997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x
Singh R, Singh D, Biswas B, Mani JK. Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency in barley. J Agrometeorol. 2012;14:358-62.
Reynolds MP, Pierre CS, Saad ASI, Vargas M, Condon AG. Evaluating potential genetic gains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive traits under drought and heat stress. Crop Sci. 2007;47(S3):172-89. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022IPBS
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Blum A. Drought resistance - Is it really a complex trait? Funct Plant Biol. 2011;38(10):753-57. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11101
Bebber DP, Ramotowski MAT, Gurr SJ. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3(11):985-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1990

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 28-01-2025 (2)
- 27-01-2025 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 J Singh, B Biswas, L K Dhaliwal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).