Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Are institutional innovations helpful in reducing transaction costs? An empirical analysis of agri-based Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs) in Kerala, India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5866
Submitted
16 October 2024
Published
18-12-2024

Abstract

Transaction costs are incurred while conducting a transaction through an exchange in the open market. New institutional economics focuses on transaction costs and the institutions involved in their reduction. This study compares the transaction costs incurred by Farmer Producer Company (FPC) members and non-members in Kerala and identifies the factors affecting these transaction costs. The study revealed no significant difference in the transaction costs incurred by FPC members and non-members. This was mainly due to the significant and higher opportunity cost of time spent on information and decision-making by FPC members compared to non-members, which surpassed the lower costs incurred for selling their farm produce by FPC members compared to non-members. Based on this study, we recommend that FPCs concentrate more on the bottom-up collectivization of individual farmers to form large business organizations that facilitate market access for small and marginal farmers and reduce transaction costs.

References

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India. Rajyasabha unstarred question no.2723, answered on 24/03/23,2023.
  2. Lowder SK, Sánchez MV, Bertini R. Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated? World Development. 2021;142:105455.
  3. Ritchie H, Roser M. Smallholders produce one-third of the world’s food, less than half of what many headlines claim. Our World in Data. 2024.
  4. Lipton M. Can small farmers survive, prosper, or be the key channel to cut mass poverty? eJADE: electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics. 2006;3(1):58-85.
  5. Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Gender in agriculture sourcebook. World Bank Publications; 2008.
  6. Barrett CB. Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. In Food security in Africa 2010. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Bernard T, Spielman DJ. Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food policy. 2009;34(1):60-9.
  8. Fischer E, Qaim M. Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World development. 2012;40(6):1255-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018.
  9. Harper, Malcolm, Preface to 'Inclusive Value Chains in India: Linking the Smallest Producers to modern markets' (November 4, 2008). M. Harper, inclusive value chains in India: linking the smallest producers to modern markets, World Scientific, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1470532
  10. Ministry of Law Justice, and Company Affairs, Government of India. Report of the high-powered committee for formation and conversion of cooperative business into companies. 2000.
  11. Alagh YK. Companies of farmers. Transition strategies for sustainable community systems: Design and Systems Perspectives. 2019:289-93.
  12. Biénabe E, Sautier D. The role of small-scale producers’ organizations in addressing market access. InBeyond Agriculture–making markets work for the poor: Proceedings of an international seminar 2005: 69-86).
  13. Lanting H. Building a farmer-owned company and linking it to international fashion houses under fair-trade arrangements. International conference on engaging communities 2005: 14-17).
  14. Hellin J, Lundy M, Meijer M. Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food policy. 2009;34(1):16-22.
  15. Wang N. Measuring transaction costs: an incomplete survey. Ronald Coase Institute, Working Paper. 2003; 2.
  16. Coase RH. The nature of the firm. InThe Roots of Logistics 2012: 317-333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  17. Coase RH. The problem of social cost. The journal of Law and Economics. 2013; 56(4):837-77.
  18. Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism. The Political Economy Reader: Markets as Institutions. 2008.
  19. Holloway G, Nicholson C, Delgado C, Staal S, Ehui S. Agroindustrialization through institutional innovation Transaction costs, cooperatives and milk-market development in the east-African highlands. Agricultural economics. 2000;23(3):279-88.
  20. Aubert BA, Weber R. Transaction cost theory, the resource-based view, and information technology sourcing decisions: A re-examination of Lacity et al.'s findings. GReSI; 2001.
  21. Karaan AS. Bridging the small-big divide: A transaction cost approach to enterprise modelling for mussel mariculture in Saldanha bay/bridging the small-big divide: A Transaction Cost 1999
  22. Mburu J, Karanja-Lumumba T, Mwai O. Determinants of transaction costs in group-based breeding approaches: the case of dairy goats in the eastern Kenyan highlands. InISAC conference proceedings 2008.
  23. Zhang T, Zhang AL, Deng SL. Transaction costs research of collective construction land market based on Williamson analysis paradigm: An empirical analysis of 1872 market transaction data and 372 questionnaire data in Nanhai District, Guangdong Province. China Land Sci. 2017; 31:11-21.
  24. Singh S. Understanding performance and impact of producer companies: Case studies across states and promoters in India. 2021
  25. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. All India Report on Input Survey 2016-17. Agriculture Census Division, 2021.
  26. Singh G, Vatta K. Assessing the economic impacts of farmer producer organizations: a case study in Gujarat, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2019, 32 (Conference Number), 139-148 DOI: 10.5958/0974-0279.2019.00023.5.
  27. Sultana A. Farmers’producer companies-a study of Telangana state.
  28. Murray EV. Producer company model-current status and future outlook: opportunities for bank finance. Financing Agriculture. 2008; 40(4):18-26.
  29. Bikkina N, Turaga RM, Bhamoriya V. Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: A case study from India. Development Policy Review. 2018; 36(6):669-87.
  30. Pani SK, Jena D, Parida NR. Farmer producer company in India: Status and policy implications on marginal and small farmers. Intl Jrl of Modern Agriculture. 2020;9(4):801-10.
  31. Nain MS, Singh R, Kumar S, Chahal VP. Farmers’ producer organisation in reducing transactional costs: A study of Tamil Nadu Mango Growers Federation (TAMAFED). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 85(10):1303-7.
  32. Duffy M. Economies of size in production agriculture. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 2009; 4(3-4):375-92.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.