Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 11 No. sp4 (2024): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - I

Genetic analysis of yield and yield components and powdery mildew resistance in F4 and F5 populations of blackgram

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5972
Submitted
19 October 2024
Published
28-12-2024
Versions

Abstract

The present investigation aimed to evaluate 96 F4 and F5 genotypes, including two parental lines (VBN11 and LBG17) of blackgram, across two locations for yield, yield components and resistance to powdery mildew. Pooled analysis, genetic variability assessment, correlation studies, parent-regression coefficient analysis and the Multi-trait Genotype Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI) were performed. Combined ANOVA (analysis of variance) revealed significant differences for all the traits studied. In the combined analysis, genotypes G3 and G1 exhibited desirable
yields along with powdery mildew resistance. High heritability and genetic advance as a percentage of the mean (GAM) were observed for the traits such as single plant yield, the number of pods per plant and percent disease index (PDI). Seed yield per plant recorded significant and positive correlations with the number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100-seed weight in both generations. Among the traits, PDI showed the highest regression coefficient. Principal component analysis exhibited four principal components (PCs) explaining the total variance in the F4 and F5 generations. The MGIDI index analysis revealed a total genetic gain for specific traits, including the number of pods per plant, single plant yield and the number of capsules per plant in the F5 generation. Genotypes G18, G19, G4 and G38 were identified as valuable genetic resource through MGIDI, contributing significantly to blackgram improvement for high yield and powdery mildew resistance.

References

  1. 1. Lewis GP, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M. Legumes of the World [Internet]. Vol. 577. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; 2005 [cited 2024 Sep 18]. Available from: https://library. wur.nl/ WebQuery/ titel/1774352
  2. 2. Publication: USDA ARS [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqno115=349687
  3. 3. Sakila M, Pandiyan M. Realization of facts and profiteering of black gram through different breeding methods. IJCS. 2018;6(4):3359-69.
  4. 4. Singh L, Kumar A, Kaur S, Gill RK. Multivariate analysis of yield contributory traits for selection criteria in urdbean (V. mungo L. Hepper). EJPB. 2020;11(4):1134-42. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1104.183
  5. 5. Tiwari AK, Shivhare AK. Pulses in India: Retrospect and prospects. Published by Director, Govt of India, Ministry of Agri and Farmers Welfare (DAC&FW), Directorate of Pulses Development, Vindhyachal Bhavan, Bhopal, MP [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://dpd.gov.in/Book%20Document%20on%20Pulses%20in%20India%20Retrospect%20&%20Prospects.pdf
  6. 6. Legaspi BM, Catipon EM, Hubbell JN. AVRDC Philippine Outreach Program mungbean studies. 1978 [cited 2024 Sep 24]; Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19790785468
  7. 7. Punithavathy P. Generation mean analysis for powdery mildew resistance in black gram [Vigna mungo (L) Hepper]. Ph.D [Thesis]. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore; 2023.
  8. 8. Govintharaj P, Tannidi S, Swaminathan M, Sabariappan R. Effectiveness of selection, parent-offspring correlation and regression in bacterial blight resistance genes introgressed rice segregating population. Ciência Rural. 2017;47(9):e20160987. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160987
  9. 9. Mayee CD, Datar VV. Phytopathometry. 1986 [cited 2024 Sep 24]; Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19861318793
  10. 10. Wheeler BEJ. An introduction to plant diseases. The English language Book Society and Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1969.
  11. 11. Olivoto T, Nardino M. MGIDI: Toward an effective multivariate selection in biological experiments. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(10):1383-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa981
  12. 12. Punithavathy P, Kumaresan D, Manivannan N, Boopathi NM, Senthilraja G. Genetics of powdery mildew disease resistance in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. EJPB. 2023;14(4):1421-24. https://doi.org/10.37992/2023.1404.155
  13. 13. Tamilzharasi M. Development and characterization of gamma and EMS induced mutants for powdery mildew resistance in black gram [Vigna mungo (L) Hepper]. Ph. D [Thesis], Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore; 2020.
  14. 14. Fondevilla S, Rubiales D. Powdery mildew control in pea. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2012;32:401-09. DOI10.1007/s13593-011-0033-1
  15. 15. Gomathi D, Shoba D, Ramamoorthy V, Pillai MA. Studies on variability, heritability, correlation and path analysis in segregating population of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res. 2023;46(6):690-94. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr-4411
  16. 16. Hemalatha K, Lal SS, Lal GM. Study on genetic variability and correlation in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(4):674-76.
  17. 17. Panigrahi KK, Baisakh B. Variability and association studies in mutants and landraces of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) of Odisha. Res J Agric Sci. 2014;5(4):817-21.
  18. 18. Priyanka S, Rangaiah S, Showkath Babu BM. Genetic variability estimates of quantitative and qualitative traits in black gram. Int J Agric Sci. 2016;8(40):1821-24.
  19. 19. Punithavathy P, Manivannan N, Subramanian A, Shanthi P, Prasad VBR. Genetic divergence of black gram genotypes (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). EJPB. 2020;11(01):156-59. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1101.028
  20. 20. Konda CR, Salimath PM, Mishra MN. Genetic variability studies for productivity and its components in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res. 2009;32(1):59-61.
  21. 21. Priya L, Pillai MA, Shoba D. Genetic divergence, variability and correlation studies in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res. 2021;44(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr-4065
  22. 22. Singh UK, Bharti L. Genetic variability of mung bean for yield and yield contributing traits. BFIJ. 2022;14(2):91-96.
  23. 23. Anuradha N, Patro T, Triveni U, Rao PJ, Rajkumar S. Character association and variability studies in black gram advanced breeding lines. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(1):1880-82.
  24. 24. Chauhan MP, Mishra AC, Singh AK. Correlation and path analysis in urd bean. Legume Res. 2007;30(3):205-08.
  25. 25. Reddy D, Venkateswarlu O, Jyothi GL, Obaiah MC. Genetic parameters and inter-relationship analysis in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Res. 2011;34(2):149-52.
  26. 26. Umadevi M, Ganesan NM. Correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper.). Madras Agricultural Journal [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 Sep 25]; Available from: https://worldveg.tind.io/record/36863/
  27. 27. Shoba D. Genetic variability and correlation studies in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. EJPB. 2018;9(4):1583-87. http://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00197.7
  28. 28. Sohel MH, Miah MR, Mohiuddin SJ, Islam A, Rahman MM, Haque MA. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). J Biosci Agric Res. 2016;7(02):621-29. https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.070216.74
  29. 29. Prasad AD, Murugan E. Correlation analysis for seed yield and its attributes in parents and F1 generation in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). APSR. 2015;391.
  30. 30. Ch S, Lal GM. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). J Pharm Innov. 2019;8:65-68.
  31. 31. Miah MR, Rob MM, Habiba U, Das KR, Islam MS. Correlation and path coefficients analysis of black gram (Vigna mungo L). EAR. 2016;3(10):10906-17.
  32. 32. Shwetha SH, Pooja SK, Sumangala Bhat. Estimation of genetic variability for powdery mildew resistance yield related traits in F2:4 population in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczeck). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;10:580-85.
  33. 33. Rani R, Singh V, Punia MS. Intergeneration correlation and parent-offspring regression in rust resistance derived F4 and F5 generations in bread wheat. Indian J Agri Sci. 2021;9195:683-88. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i5.112983

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.