Discriminant analysis of agricultural input dealer’s perceptions in fertilizer and secondary nutrient brands

S Rokith; K Mahendran; S L Moghana; N Kiruthika; P Meenakshisundaram

doi:10.14719/pst.6028

Authors

Rokith Solai Department of Agricultural and Rural Management, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641 003, India https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3610-9418
Mahendran Kandaswamy Department of Agricultural and Rural Management, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641 003, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-6052
Moghana Lavanya Sengodan Department of Agricultural and Rural Management, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641 003, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1330-5965
Kiruthika Natarajan Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641003, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9332-5220
Meenakshisundaram Palaniappan Department of Plant Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641 003, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7584-2294

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6028

Keywords:

agriculture input, dealers’ perception, fertilizers, secondary nutrients, perceptual mapping, discriminant analysis

Abstract

Agri-input dealers play an intermediary role between fertilizer manufacturers and farmers, serving as a crucial link in the agricultural value chain. This study investigates the perceptions of agri-input dealers regarding various fertilizer and secondary nutrient brands and develops a perceptual map to visualize their market positioning. Discriminant analysis is used as a method for categorizing entities into distinct groups. This analytical approach differentiates two or more collections of objects or individuals based on their specific characteristics. Perceptual mapping, on the other hand, is an attribute-centric strategy employed by brand managers to understand customer perceptions of their brands compared to rival brands. This study aims to explore how dealers associate various agriculture input companies with key factors influencing brand preferences, such as product quality, pricing, brand reputation, credit availability, profit margin and marketing support. By understanding dealers' perspectives, fertilizer manufacturers can gain valuable insights into their brand positioning, identify areas for improvement and develop strategies to enhance their market share and customer satisfaction within the agri-input dealer channel. Notable distinctions were observed in this study, particularly in terms of product quality and pricing.

Downloads

References

Jadhav AP, Moharekar TJ, Moharekar TT. Role of agritech start-ups in India. Journal of the Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda ISSN.;25:0422.

Pradhan A, DJ N, Panda AK, Wagh RD, Maske MR, RV B. Farming system for nutrition-a pathway to dietary diversity: evidence from India. Plos one. 2021;16(3):e0248698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248698

Kumar HV, Chauhan NB, Patel DD, Patel JB. Predictive factors to avoid farming as a livelihood. Journal of Economic Structures. 2019;8:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0141-7

Chand R, Kumar P. Determinants of capital formation and agriculture growth: Some new explorations. Economic and Political Weekly. 2004:5611-6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4415977

Elakkiya S, Asokhan M. Role and performance of Agri-input dealers in extension services in Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2021;13(SI):156-61. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v13iSI.2819

Hazra G. Leaching Study of some lead-iron phosphate simulated nuclear waste glasses with different modifiers under soxhlet condition. IJAREAS. 2013;2(12):30-47.

Rahman MM, Soaud AA, Darwish FA, Sofian-Azirun M. Effects of sulphur and nitrogen on nutrients uptake of corn using acidified water. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(42):8275-83. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1401

Gransee A, Führs H. Magnesium mobility in soils as a challenge for soil and plant analysis, magnesium fertilization and root uptake under adverse growth conditions. Plant and Soil. 2013;368:5-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1567-y

Usama M, Khalid MA. Fertilizer consumption in India and need for its balanced use: A review. Indian J Environ Prot. 2018;38(7):564-77.

Kumar S, Atal R, Roy S, Panda CK, Sohane RK. Role of agri-input dealers in providing extension services to the farmers of Bihar (India) and their role expectation from government institutions. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2020;39(5):1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i530539

Patel V, Biggs EM, Pauli N, Boruff B. Using a social-ecological system approach to enhance understanding of structural interconnectivities within the beekeeping industry for sustainable decision making. Ecology & Society. 2020;25(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11639-250224

Marsh S, Pannell D. The changing relationship between private and public sector agricultural extension in Australia. Rural Society. 1998;8(2):133-51. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.8.2.133

Evenson RE, Westphal LE. Technological change and technology strategy. Handbook of Development Economics. 1995;3:2209-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(05)80009-9

Anderson JR, Feder G. Agricultural extension: Good intentions and hard realities. The World Bank Research Observer. 2004;19(1):41-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkh013

Elakkiya S, Asokhan M. Role and performance of Agri-input dealers in extension services in Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2021;13(SI):156-61. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v13iSI.2819