Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Review of mechanical sugarcane harvesters: Performance, efficiency and crop suitability

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6597
Submitted
8 December 2024
Published
27-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Mechanical sugarcane harvesting has become essential to modern agriculture, helping farmers overcome labour shortages while improving efficiency and productivity. The performance of these machines is influenced by several factors, including the characteristics of the crop, the terrain and how well the equipment is operated. A comparison between whole-stalk and chopper harvesters highlights key differences in throughput capacity, energy use and adaptability to different field conditions. Chopper harvesters, for example, can process up to 132.7 tons of sugarcane per hour under ideal conditions but tend to lose efficiency when faced with uneven terrain or more complex crop varieties. This study explores mechanical sugarcane harvesting systems' efficiency, adaptability and economic feasibility while identifying key operational and technological challenges. Advances in harvesting technology, such as precision cutting mechanisms, optimized field logistics and the breeding of sugarcane varieties designed for mechanization, have helped to improve efficiency while reducing environmental impact. However, the high cost of these machines remains a significant hurdle, especially for small-scale farmers. Making shared ownership arrangements, government subsidies and the development of cost-effective semi-mechanized alternatives are viable solutions. To fully optimize mechanical harvesting, an integrated approach is necessary. This includes leveraging technology, improving field management practices and offering specialized training programs. These efforts are essential for making sugarcane farming more sustainable, maximizing yields and ensuring long-term economic viability for farmers.

References

  1. Pongpat P, Gheewala SH, Silalertruksa T. An assessment of harvesting practices of sugarcane in the central region of Thailand. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:1138–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.178
  2. Ashraf M, Khan M, Abbas M, Iqbal M. Development of cost-effective small-scale harvesters for sugarcane. J Agric Eng Technol. 2023;15(2):112–25.
  3. Zein El-den AM, Ahmed SF, Hanafy WM, Elwakeel AE. Review of some parameters related to the base-cutter of sugarcane harvesters. MISR J Agric Engineering. 2020;37(4):325–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2020.47247.1012
  4. Fatah GSA, Verona L, Nugraheni SD. The analysis of labor efficiency on sugarcane cultivation through mechanization application. IOP Earth and Environ Sci. 2022;974(1):012127. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/974/
  5. /012127
  6. Solano CS, Ponciano NJ, de Azevedo HJ, de Souza PM. Factors limiting the implementation of mechanical harvesting of sugarcane in Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil. Revista Ceres. 2017;64(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201764010006
  7. Wegener M, Ou YG, Yang DT, Liu QT, Zheng DK. Mechanizing sugarcane harvesting in China: A review. Proceedings of the Intl Soc Sugar Cane Tech. 2013;28.
  8. Smithers J. Review of sugarcane trash recovery systems for energy cogeneration in South Africa. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;32:915–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.042
  9. Elwakeel AE, Ahmed SF, Zein Eldin AM, Hanafy WM. A review on sugarcane harvesting technology. Al-Azhar J Agric Eng. 2022;2(1):54–63. https://doi.org/10.21608/azeng.2022.240434
  10. Bin Ajmal U, Ahmad M, Ghafoor A, Khaliq A. Fabrication and performance evaluation of variable width whole-stalk sugarcane harvester. Pakistan J Agric Sci. 2019;56(4):885–90.
  11. El Shal AM, Mazrou YS, El Didamony MI. Engineering and economic evaluation of a prototype fabricated for harvesting sugarcane. Designs. 2022;6(3):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6030040
  12. Shanthy TR, Antony PW, Karpagam C. From manual to mechanical harvesting in sugarcane: Social implications. J Sugarcane Res. 2013;3(2):145–62
  13. Abdel-Mawla HA. State of the art: Sugarcane mechanical harvesting-discussion of efforts in Egypt. Int J Eng Techn Res. 2014;2(11):57–68.
  14. Mathanker SK, Gan H, Buss JC, Lawson B, Hansen AC, Ting KC. Power requirements and field performance in harvesting energy cane and sugarcane. Biomass Bioen. 2015;75:227–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.
  15. 025
  16. Sharma R, Singh P. Innovations in base-cutting mechanisms for whole cane harvesters. J Agric Engg.
  17. ;54(2):120–34.
  18. Dharmawardene MWN. Trends in farm mechanization by sugarcane small landholders in Sri Lanka. Sugar Tech. 2006;8(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943736
  19. Banchi ÂD, Garcia AP, Albiero D, Galvão CB, Favarin LG. Importance of crop productivity and equipment lifetime in the strategic and tactical management of sugarcane harvesters. Engenharia Agrícola. 2020;40:601_8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n5p601-608/2020
  20. Abdelhady A, Ibrahim M, Mansour H, El-Shafie A, Abd El Rahman E. Physico-mechanical properties of sugarcane stalks. Acta Technol Agric. 2023;26(3):142–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0019.
  21. Meyer E. Some measurements of mechanical sugarcane harvester performance. In Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists Association. 1999;73.
  22. Sethanan K, Neungmatcha W. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for mechanical harvester route planning of sugarcane field operations. Eur J Oper Res. 2016; 252(3):969–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.
  23. 043
  24. Nawi NM, Chen G, Jensen T. In-field measurement and sampling technologies for monitoring quality in the sugarcane industry: A review. Precision Agric. 2014;15:684–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-014-9362-9
  25. Wegener M, Ying-gang L. Economic incentives and policies for the adoption of sugarcane harvesting technology. J Agric Econ. 2015;67(4):765–80.
  26. Ashraf MT, Naik RK, Rai DK. Design and development of low-cost sugar cane harvester for Chhattisgarh region. Adv Life Sci. 2016;5(18):7681–87.
  27. Smithers J. Review of sugarcane trash recovery systems for energy cogeneration in South Africa. Renew Sustain Energy Revi. 2014;32:915–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.042
  28. Santoro E, Soler EM, Cherri AC. Route optimization in mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Comput Electron Agricul. 2017;141:140–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.07.013
  29. Ashraf MT, Victor VM. Some base cutting parameters in sugarcane harvester: A review. Journal of Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2023;12(3):81–85.
  30. Ferraz A, Santos JDG, Rossetto R, Biagi JD, Albiero D. Advancements of agriculture 4.0 in mechanized sugarcane harvesting: A review. Ciência Rural. 2024;54(12):e20220562. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20220562

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.