Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Screening rice varieties for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency and yield based on root trait evaluation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7902
Submitted
24 February 2025
Published
23-10-2025

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilizers have played a significant role in enhancing rice yield over recent decades; however, their excessive use has also led to considerable negative environmental impacts. To achieve sustainable productivity, it is essential to adopt strategies that enhance yield while reducing, or at least minimizing, nitrogen input, thereby improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). The crucial physiological reasons for maintaining high yield and NUE in N-efficient varieties were attributed to better root system characteristics. Fourteen selected rice varieties, comprising both short-duration and medium-duration varieties, were screened for NUE based on root characteristics under field conditions at two levels of the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN). Application of 100 % RDN resulted in a significantly higher root volume and Root dry weight. Interaction effects also showed significant influence. Based on the Root Dry Weight Efficiency Index (RDWEI), seven varieties were classified as efficient (RDWEI > 1.0). At the same time, the remaining seven were moderately efficient (RDWEI 0.5–1.0) and none of the varieties were N inefficient (RDWEI <0.5). Trends in RDWEI were consistent with variations in grain yield, highlighting its reliability as a NUE indicator. Among the evaluated varieties, Harsha recorded the highest grain yield (4.1 t ha⁻¹), which was statistically comparable to Varsha, Aiswarya and Sreyas. Notably, varieties that maintained stable yields under reduced N application demonstrated superior adaptability and NUE. The study confirmed that genetic variability exists in N response, and the interaction between variety and N levels significantly influenced yield and root traits. Identifying N-efficient genotypes with robust root systems presents a promising approach for enhancing N management and promoting sustainable rice production, as well as improved soil health.

References

  1. 1. Seck PA, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis MCS. Crops that feed the world 7: Rice. Food Secur. 2012;4:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0168-1
  2. 2. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. Global agriculture towards 2050. How to feed the world 2050. High-level Expert Forum, 12–13 October 2009 [Internet]. Rome: Agricultural Development Economics Division, FAO; 2009 [cited 2025 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert
  3. 3. Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat Geosci. 2008;1(10):636–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo325
  4. 4. Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Adv Agron. 2005;88:97–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88004-6
  5. 5. Fischer RA, Byerlee D, Edmeades GO. Crop yields and global food security: will yield increase continue to feed the world? Canberra: ACIAR; 2014. p. 8–11. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Derek-Byerlee/publication/282713287
  6. 6. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 2015;347(6223):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
  7. 7. Fageria NK. Plant tissue test for determination of optimum concentration and uptake of nitrogen at divergent growth stages in lowland rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2002;34:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120017430
  8. 8. Fowler D, Coyle M, Skiba U, Sutton MA, Cape JN, Reis S, et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1621):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164
  9. 9. Sobota DJ, Compton JE, McCrackin ML, Singh S. Cost of reactive nitrogen release from human activities to the environment in the United States. Environ Res Lett. 2015;10(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/025006
  10. 10. Gregory PJ. Root growth and activity. In: Peterson GA, editor. Physiology and determination of crop yield. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA; 1994. p. 65–93. https://doi.org/10.2134/1994.physiologyanddetermination.c5
  11. 11. Ambus JV, Awe GO, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Reichert JM. Integrated crop-livestock systems in lowlands with rice cultivation improve root environment and maintain soil structure and functioning. Soil Tillage Res. 2023;227:105592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105592
  12. 12. Saengwilai P, Tian X, Lynch JP. Low crown root number enhances nitrogen acquisition from low-nitrogen soils in maize. Plant Physiol. 2014;166:581–89. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.232603
  13. 13. Zhang L, Ju X, Gao Q, Zhang F. Recovery of 15N‐labeled nitrate injected into deep subsoil by maize in a calcareous alluvial soil on the North China Plain. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2007;38(11–12):1563–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701378490
  14. 14. Tang Q, Ma Y, Zhao L, Song Z, Yin Y, Wang G, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen management on root morphology, nitrogen metabolism enzymes, and yield of rice under drip irrigation. Agron. 2023;13(4):1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041118
  15. 15. Xin W, Liu H, Zhao H, Wang J, Zheng H, Jia Y, et al. The response of grain yield and Root morphological and physiological traits to nitrogen levels in paddy rice. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:713814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.713814
  16. 16. KAU [Kerala Agricultural University]. Package of practices recommendations: crops. 15th ed. Thrissur: Kerala Agricultural University; 2016. 393 p.
  17. 17. Misra RD, Ahmed M. Manual on irrigation agronomy. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1989. 410 p. https://search.worldcat.org/title/manual-on-irrigation-agronomy/oclc/17010596
  18. 18. Fageria NK. The use of nutrients in crop plants. New York: CRC Press; 2009. 430 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp227
  19. 19. Fageria NK. Maximizing crop yields. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1992. 274 p. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NbPMD99XIkEC
  20. 20. Donald CM, Hamblin J. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv Agron. 1976;28:361–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60559-3
  21. 21. Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. GRAPES: General Rshiny based analysis platform empowered by statistics [Internet]. Version 1.0.0. 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.kaugrapes.com/home
  22. 22. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1957.
  23. 23. Wang B, Guo X, Qi X, Feng F, Zhu X, Hu Y, et al. OsSPL14 is involved in nitrogen-deficiency-induced root elongation in rice. Environ Exp Bot. 2022;198:104852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104852
  24. 24. Shi WM, Xu WF, Li SM, Zhao XQ, Dong GQ. Responses of two rice cultivars differing in seedling-stage nitrogen use efficiency to growth under low-nitrogen conditions. Plant Soil. 2010;326:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0007-0
  25. 25. Wang Q, Zhu Y, Zou X, Li F, Zhang J, Kang Z, et al. Nitrogen deficiency-induced decrease in cytokinins content promotes rice seminal root growth by promoting root meristem cell proliferation and cell elongation. Cells. 2020;9(4):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040916
  26. 26. Garnett T, Conn V, Kaiser BN. Root based approaches to improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32(9):1272–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02011.x
  27. 27. Francisco RH, Shane MW, Lopez-Bucio J. Nutritional regulation of root development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015;4(4):431–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.183
  28. 28. Razzaque MA, Haque MM, Hamid MA, Khaliq QA, Solaiman ARM. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and elevated CO₂ on dry matter production and yield of rice cultivars. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2009;34(2):313–22. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v34i2.5804
  29. 29. Swamy KN, Kondamudi R, Kiran TV, Vijayalakshmi P, Rao YV, Rao PR, et al. Screening for nitrogen use efficiency with their root characteristics in rice (Oryza spp.) genotypes. Ann Biol Sci. 2015;3:8–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292981269_
  30. 30. Wu L, Yuan S, Huang L, Sun F, Zhu G, Li G, et al. Physiological mechanisms underlying the high-grain yield and high-nitrogen use efficiency of elite rice varieties under a low rate of nitrogen application in China. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01024
  31. 31. Dorlodot S, Forster B, Pages L, Price A, Tuberosa R, Draye X. Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(10):474–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.012
  32. 32. Ju CX, Buresh RJ, Wang ZQ, Zhang H, Liu LJ, Yang JC, Zhang JH. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application. Field Crops Res. 2015;175:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.007
  33. 33. Peng Y, Li X, White P, Li C. A large and deep root system underlies high nitrogen-use efficiency in maize production. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126293
  34. 34. Xu GW, Lu DK, Wang HZ, Li YJ. Morphological and physiological traits of rice roots and their relationships to yield and nitrogen utilization as influenced by irrigation regime and nitrogen rate. Agric Water Manage. 2018;203:385–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.033
  35. 35. Arai-Sanoh Y, Takai T, Yoshinaga S, Nakano H, Kojima M, et al. Deep rooting conferred by deeper rooting 1 enhances rice yield in paddy fields. Sci Rep. 2015;4:5563. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05563
  36. 36. Yan J, Wu QX, Qi DL, Zhu JQ. Rice yield, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency responses to nitrogen management strategies under supplementary irrigation for rain-fed rice cultivation. Agric Water Manage. 2022;263:107486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107486
  37. 37. Singh H, Verma A, Ansari MW, Shukla A. Physiological response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to elevated nitrogen applied under field conditions. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(7):e29015. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.29015
  38. 38. Moro BM, Nuhu IR, Ato E, Naathanial B. Effect of nitrogen rates on the growth and yield of three rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in rain-fed lowland in the forest agro-ecological zone of Ghana. Int J Agric Sci. 2015;5(7):878–85.
  39. 39. Zhu KY, Yan JQ, Shen Y, Zhang WY, Xu YJ, Wang ZQ. Deciphering the morpho–physiological traits for high yield potential in nitrogen efficient varieties (NEVs): A japonica rice case study. J Integr Agric. 2022;21(4):947–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63600
  40. 40. Jayanti T, Gali SK, Chimmad VP, Angadi VV. Leaf colour chart based N management on yield, harvest index and partial factor productivity of rainfed rice. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2007;20(2):405–6. https://doi.org/10.5555/20083021466

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.