Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Biological performance and profitability study of different medicinal plants grown as intercrops in arecanut plantations

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9829
Submitted
4 June 2025
Published
12-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Monocropping of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) results in underutilised resources. However, including medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) provides a sustainable way to enhance soil health, resource efficiency and financial rewards. In Odisha, favourable climate and arecanut canopy structure support MAP cultivation, yet adoption remains limited. To explore the productivity and economics of arecanut based cropping systems, a field experiment was conducted in a 5-year-old arecanut plantation during 2021–23. Three cropping systems combined with varied nutrient management strategies including organic recycling and biofertilizers were evaluated. The results indicated that application of biofertilizers consortia along with organic recycling of biomass + 75 % of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through soil test based dose (STD) in arecanut + Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) + Rauvolfia serpentina (sarpagandha) system recorded higher chali yield (2.33 kg palm-1). Whereas highest arecanut equivalent yield (84.46 q ha-1)
was obtained with arecanut + turmeric + black turmeric under 100 % NPK and organic recycling. Maximum system productivity (91.35 q ha-1) was noted in arecanut + Andrographis paniculata (kalmegh) + Ocimum sanctum (tulsi) with organic recycling of biomass and application of 75 % NPK and biofertilizer consortia. Arecanut + Curcuma longa (turmeric) + C. caesia (black turmeric) system with organic recycling of biomass and 100 % NPK (STD) exhibited the maximum net return (₹1069363), while arecanut + W. somnifera (ashwagandha) + R. serpentina (sarpagandha) reported the maximum benefit-cost (B:C) ratio (2.66). These findings highlight arecanut based cropping system as an economically viable, resource-efficient cropping strategy for Odisha.

References

  1. 1. National Horticulture Board. Horticulture Statistics at a Glance, 2021–22 (2nd estimate). Minis-try of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare, Horticulture Statistics Division, Government of India, 1–3. Available online: Horticultural Crops 2021-22 (Second Adv Est).xlsx
  2. 2. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Chowdappa P. Cropping systems approach for improving resource use in are-canut (Areca catechu) plantation. Indian J Agric Sci 2016;86(9):1113-20. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i9.61349
  3. 3. Sujatha S, Bhat R. Response of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia A.) intercropped in arecanut to irriga-tion and nutrition in humid tropics of India. Agric Water Manag. 2010;97:988-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.031
  4. 4. Balasimha D. Cropping systems. In: Arecanut. Kasaragod, Kerala: Central Plantation Crops Research Institute; 2004. p. 103–30.
  5. 5. Bhat R, Sujatha S. Root distribution of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) as influenced by drip fertigation in a laterite soil. Indian J Agric Sci. 2008;78(9):803-806.
  6. 6. Viswanathan TV, Radhakrishnan VV, Reghunath BR, Prasannakumari KT. Patchouli (Pogostemon cablin) as an intercrop in young coconut (Cocos nucifera) garden. Indian J Agric Sci. 1992;62(9):616-17.
  7. 7. Maheswarappa HP, Nanjappa HV, Hegde MR. Influence of agronomic practices on growth, productivity and quality of galangal (Kaempferia galanga L.) grown as intercrop in coconut garden. JPC. 2000;28(1):72-81.
  8. 8. Reddy DVS, Biddappa CC. Coconut based cropping/farming systems in India. J Plant Crops. 2000;28(1):1-18.
  9. 9. Vishwajith KP, Sahu P, Dhekale B, Noman M, Mishra P. Exploring the feasibility of arecanut based farming systems in augmenting farm economy: A case study in Karnataka, India. J Crop Weed. 2015;11:127-33.
  10. 10. Mohapatra S, Sahoo SC, Samant D, Swain SC. Influence of integrated nutrient management on physico-chemical properties of soil, growth, flowering and yield of guava grown as a component crop in coconut-based cropping system. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(22):102-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss%2F2023%2Fv35i224117
  11. 11. Singh HP, Singh G. Nutrient and water management in guava. In: Proc 1st International Guava Symposium, CISH, Lucknow. Acta Hortic. 2007;735:389–97. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.55
  12. 12. Adak T, Kumar K, Singha A. Spatio-temporal variations in soil moisture and soil temperature under high density guava orchard system. Proceedings of 5th Indian Horticulture Congress: Horticulture for Food and Environment Security; 2012 Nov 6–9; PAU, Ludhiana, India, p. 397. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.812273
  13. 13. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Balasimha D, Kannan C. Crop diversification in arecanut plantation through intercropping of medicinal and aromatic plants. JPC. 2006;34(3):318-22.
  14. 14. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Kannan C, Balasimha D. Impact of intercropping of medicinal and aromatic plants with organic farming approach on resource use efficiency in arecanut (Areca catechu L.) plantation in India. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;33(1):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.001
  15. 15. Franzel S, Jaenicke H, Janssen W. Choosing the right trees: Setting priorities for multipurpose tree improvement. ISNAR Research Report No. 8. The Hague, Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research; 1996.
  16. 16. Ayuk ET, Duguma B, Franzel S, Kengue J, Mollet M, Tiki-Manga T, et al. Uses, management and economic potential of Irvingia gabonensis in the humid lowland of Cameroon. For Ecol Manage. 1999;113:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00323-5
  17. 17. Bhat R, Sujatha S. Soil fertility status as influenced by arecanut based cropping system and nutrient management. JPC. 2007;35:158-65.
  18. 18. Fentene M. Intra- and inter-specific competition between seedlings of Acacia etbaica and a perennial grass (Hyparrhenia hirta). J Arid Environ. 2003;55:441-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00052-1
  19. 19. De Wit CT, Van den Bergh JP. Competition between herbage plants. J Agric Sci. 1965;13:212-21. https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v13i2.17501
  20. 20. Odo PE. Evaluation of short and tall sorghum varieties in mixtures with cowpea in the Sudan savanna of Nigeria: Land equivalent ratio, grain yield and system productivity index. Exp Agric. 1991;27:435-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700019426
  21. 21. Tripathi P, Shah S, Kashyap SD, Tripathi A. Fruit yield and quality characteristics of high density Prunus persica (L.) Batsch plantation intercropped with medicinal and aromatic plants in the Indian Western Himalayas. Agrofor Syst. 2019;93:1717-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0276-9
  22. 22. Kumar NP. Effect of intercropping on fruit crops: A review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(12):745-55.
  23. 23. Ghosh DK, Bandopadhyay A. Performance of some coconut cultivars and hybrids in alluvial plains of West Bengal. J Crop Weed. 2015;11(1):197–99.
  24. 24. Bhat R, Reddy VM, Khader KBA. Response of high yielding varieties of arecanut to fertilizer levels in coastal Karnataka. J Plantn Crops. 1999;27(3):187-92.
  25. 25. Hegde NK, Sulikeri GS. Mixed and multi-storeyed cropping in an areca (Areca catechu L.) plantation in India. Trop Agric. 2004;81(4):236.
  26. 26. Hussain M, Krishnakumar V, Ray AK, Bhat R, Maheswarappa HP, Subramanian P, et al. Recycling of organic biomass from arecanut based high density multispecies cropping system models under Assam condition. JPC. 2008;36:53-57.
  27. 27. Hussain M, Subramanian P, Ray AK, Bhat R, Maheswarappa HP, Krishnakumar V, et al. Sustainable productivity and economics of arecanut based high density multispecies cropping system under Brahmaputra valley region of Assam. JPC. 2011;39:68-72.
  28. 28. Waman AA, Maheswarappa HP, Jerard BA, Velmurugan A, Senthilkumar, Chakraborty G. Evaluation of intercrops in arecanut gardens of South Andaman Island. J Andaman Sci Assoc. 2019;24(1):1–4.
  29. 29. Selva Rani A, Subbulakshmi S, Kavitha K, Nazreen Hassan S, Latha R, Suresh S. A review on coconut based intercropping. Int J Res Agron. 2024;7(9S):243–47. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9sd.1475
  30. 30. Varghese PT, Nelliat EV, Balakrishnan TK. Beneficial interactions of coconut–cocoa crop combination. Proceedings of PLACROSYM-I (Plantation Crops Symposium). Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, India; 1978 p. 383-92.
  31. 31. Kumbar VKK. Influence of nutrient management practices on soil biological properties and yield in arecanut-based cropping systems [M.Sc. thesis]. Karnataka: UAS Dharwad; 2022.
  32. 32. ICAR-CPCRI. Annual Report-2019. Kasaragod, Kerala: ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute; 2019.
  33. 33. Rao MR, Palada MC, Becker BN. Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 2004;61:107-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028993.83007.4b
  34. 34. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Balasimha D, Elain Apshara S. Arecanut based inter/mixed cropping systems. In: Thomas GV, Krishnakumar V, Maheswarappa HP, Bhat R, Balasimha D, editors. Arecanut based cropping/farming systems. Kasaragod: CPCRI; 2011. p. 6–26.
  35. 35. Sivaraman K, Thankamani CK, Srinivasan V. Crop diversification: Cropping/system approach for enhancing farmers’ income. In: Ravindran PN, Sivaraman K, Devasahayam S, Babu KN, editors. Handbook of spices in India: 75 Years of Research and development. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 3839–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_61
  36. 36. Maheswarappa HP. Arecanut-based cropping systems with vanilla and medicinal plants. In: Five decades of AICRP on Palms. ICAR-CPCRI; 2022. p. 24-30.
  37. 37. Ghosh DK, Bandopadhyay A. Productivity and profitability of coconut based cropping systems with fruits and black pepper in West Bengal. J Crop Weed. 2011;7(2):134-37.
  38. 38. Shahapurmath GB, Shivanna H, Girisha HV. Performance of arecanut based mixed cropping systems. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2003;16(2):254-59.
  39. 39. Chandrashekhar G, Bhattacharjee H. Economics of different horticultural crops under arecanut based multi-storeyed cropping system in West Bengal condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(4):2756-–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.314
  40. 40. Sarkar PK, Dhakar MK, Das B, Das B, Sarkar P. Medicinal plant-based agroforestry systems. In: Saran PL, Kumar M, editors. Recent advances in agroforestry and climate resilient agriculture. Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press; 2024. p. 39-54.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.