Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Effect of pre-culture incubation duration on the physicochemical and microbial properties of vegan yogurt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10031
Submitted
13 June 2025
Published
22-09-2025

Abstract

At present, the consumption trend of plant-based nutritional products is becoming increasingly widespread, particularly among individuals with lactose intolerance or milk allergies. This study aimed to develop a plant-based yogurt using purple rice supplemented with soymilk, focusing on optimizing fermentation efficiency and product quality. The effects of varying commercial yogurt starter culture concentrations (0.5 %, 1.0 %, 1.5 % and 2.0 %) and pre-culture incubation durations (8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 hr) were investigated. Bacterial density, fermentation time, lactic acid production and water-holding capacity of the yogurt were checked as the observed criteria. With a 1.5 % inoculum ratio pre-culture incubated within 32 hr, which was selected as the optimal condition ensuring between
fermented efficiency and yogurt quality. Applying this condition, the bacterial concentration achieved 5.81 × 108 (cfu/mL), the fermentation duration was shortened to 360 min and the water-holding capacity (WHC) reached its maximum value at 94.66 %, presenting a well-formed gel texture with high flocculation and enhanced sensory attributes. This paper provided a practical approach for economical production of high-quality plant-based yogurt from unutilized crops.

References

  1. 1. Alcorta A, Porta A, Tárrega A, Alvarez MD, Vaquero MP. Foods for plant based diets: Challenges and innovations. Foods. 2021;10(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020293
  2. 2. Pua A, Tang VCY, Goh RMV, Sun J, Lassabliere B, Liu SQ. Ingredients, processing, and fermentation: Addressing the organoleptic boundaries of plant based dairy analogues. Foods. 2022;11(6):875. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060875
  3. 3. Qin P, Wang T, Luo Y. A review on plant based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development. J Agric Food Res. 2022;7:100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100265
  4. 4. Patil SB, Khan MK. Germinated brown rice as a value added rice product: A review. Food Sci Technol. 2011;48:661 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0232-4
  5. 5. Yamuangmorn S, Prom U Thai C. The potential of high anthocyanin purple rice as a functional ingredient in human health. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(6):833. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060833
  6. 6. Xiong Q, Lu Y, Gu W, Zhang Y, Li A, Cai S, Zhou N. Biomarkers of the main nutritional components in purple rice during five successive grain filling stages. Food Chem X. 2024;23:101528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101528
  7. 7. Montemurro M, Pontonio E, Coda R, Rizzello CG. Plant based alternatives to yogurt: State of the‐art and perspectives of new biotechnological challenges. Foods. 2021;10(2):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020316
  8. 8. Dhakal D, Younas T, Bhusal RP, Devkota L, Henry CJ, Dhital S. Design rules of plant based yoghurt mimic: Formulation, functionality, sensory profile and nutritional value. Food Hydrocolloids. 2023;142:108786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108786
  9. 9. Boukid F, Hassoun A, Zouari A, Tülbek M, Mefleh M, Aït Kaddour A, Castellari M. Fermentation for designing innovative plant based meat and dairy alternatives. Foods. 2023;12(5):1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12051005
  10. 10. Grasso N, Alonso Miravalles L, O’Mahony JA. Composition, physicochemical and sensorial properties of commercial plant based yogurts. Foods. 2020;9(3):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030252
  11. 11. Silva ARA, Silva MMN, Ribeiro BD. Health issues and technological aspects of plant based alternative milk. Food Res Int. 2020;131:108972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108972
  12. 12. Harper AR, Dobson RCJ, Morris VK, Moggré GJ. Fermentation of plant based dairy alternatives by lactic acid bacteria. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15(5):1404-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14008
  13. 13. Vijaya Kumar B, Vijayendra SV, Reddy OV. Trends in dairy and non dairy probiotic products- A review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(10):6112-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197 015-1795-2
  14. 14. Wang X, Wang L, Wei X, Xu C, Cavender G, Lin W, Sun S. Invited review: Advances in yogurt development—microbiological safety, quality, functionality, sensory evaluation, and consumer perceptions across different dairy and plant based alternative sources. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(1):33-58. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024 25322
  15. 15. Zhai J, Zhuang Y, Sun L, Gu Y, Fan X. Nutritional health aspects and functional properties of nut yogurt: Future perspectives. Food Chem X. 2025;25:102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.102102
  16. 16. Zannini E, Jeske S, Lynch KM, Arendt EK. Development of novel quinoa based yoghurt fermented with dextran producer Weissella cibaria MG1. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;268:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.01.001
  17. 17. Kechagia M, Basoulis D, Konstantopoulou S, Dimitriadi D, Gyftopoulou K, Skarmoutsou N, Fakiri EM. Health benefits of probiotics: A review. ISRN Nutr. 2013;2013:481651. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/481651
  18. 18. Anumudu CK, Miri T, Onyeaka H. Multifunctional applications of lactic acid bacteria: Enhancing safety, quality, and nutritional value in foods and fermented beverages. Foods. 2024;13(23):3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13233714
  19. 19. Abbaspour N. Fermentation’s pivotal role in shaping the future of plant based foods: An integrative review of fermentation processes and their impact on sensory and health benefits. Appl Food Res. 2024;4(2):100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2024.100468
  20. 20. Barbosa MLS, de Alencar ER, Leandro EdS, Borges RM, Mendonça MA, Ferreira WF dS. Characterization of fermented beverages made with soybean and Brazil nut hydrosoluble extracts. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci. 2020;21:100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100228
  21. 21. Ny TTH, Dat NQ, Anh NTL, Thien TV, Huong PT. Research on soy yogurt production from microorganisms in kefir. Univ Danang J Sci Technol. 2015;11(96):105-109.
  22. 22. Haskito AEP, Pagaga MC. Study of total lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and antioxidant activity in goat milk yoghurt fortified by white rice bran flour. Adv Health Sci Res. 2019;19:8-10. https://doi.org/10.2991/isessah-19.2019.3
  23. 23. Borshchevskaya LN, Gordeeva TL, Kalinina AN, Sineolii SP. Spectrophotometric determination of lactic acid. J Anal Chem. 2016;71(8):755-58. http://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934816080037
  24. 24. Abdel MES. Microbial Starter Cultures. Mauritius: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2018.
  25. 25. Worku H, Amenu K, Fesseha H. The role of starter culture in producing probiotic yoghurt: Significance for human health A review. Int J Recent Biotechnol. 2020;8(2):20-34. https://doi.org/10.18782/2322 0392.1286
  26. 26. Dung TT, Toan VT, Thong DV, Hieu VC. Completion of production technology of functional micro products supplemented with biochar. JVAST. 2017;10(83):84-91.
  27. 27. Dung NC, Cham NT. Research on processing yogurt products supplemented with guava jam. Mekong Univ Sci J. 2018;10:77-89.
  28. 28. Phuong HTA, Hai PV, Chuc LTH, Khuong NDT, Hang PT, Hoa NT, et al. Study of optimisation growth conditions and spore production of Bacillus subtilis b23 used in poultry production. Huaf J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;8(3):4436-43. https://doi.org/10.46826/huaf jasat.v8n3y2024.1171
  29. 29. Sahu R, Meghavarnam AK, Janakiraman S. A simple, efficient and rapid screening technique for differentiating nitrile hydratase and nitrilase producing bacteria. Biotechnol Rep. 2019;24:e00396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00396
  30. 30. Luong DT, Hang HT, Hop DV. Culture condition for the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus VTCC 12257 in lab and 30 litre bioreactor scale. JVAST. 2020;62(6):58-64.
  31. 31. Cuong TV, Hat BV, Lam LTB, Huy NX, Ha PQ, Minh BV. Environmental microbiology textbook. Vietnam: Bach Khoa Publishing House; Hanoi; 2018.
  32. 32. Giang NTN, Khai TV. Effect of fermentation conditions (yeast content and fermentation time) on the ethanol and bioactive compounds of Elaeocarpus hygrophilus Kurz wine by using response surface methodology. Brewing Science. 2023;76(3/4):30-37.
  33. 33. Cáceres PJ, Peñas E, Martínez Villaluenga C, García Mora P, Frías J. Development of a multifunctional yogurt like product from germinated brown rice. LWT. 2019;99:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.10.008
  34. 34. Kucharczyk K, Tuszyński T, Żyła K, Puchalski C. The effect of yeast generations on fermentation, maturation and volatile compounds of beer. Czech J Food Sci. 2020;38(3):144-50. https://doi.org/10.17221/193/2018-CJFS
  35. 35. Shi H, Zhao Y, Wang W, Zhou Y, Liang Y, Wu R, Wu J. The potential of lactic acid bacteria in fermented herbs derived food products. Food Biosci. 2024;61:104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104714
  36. 36. Marlapati L, Basha RFS, Navarre A, Kinchla AJ, Nolden AA. Comparison of physical and compositional attributes between commercial plant based and dairy yogurts. Foods. 2024;13(7):984. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13070984
  37. 37. Cui B, Lu YM, Tan CP, Wang GQ, Li GH. Effect of cross linked acetylated starch content on the structure and stability of set yoghurt. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;35:576-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.