Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Nutrient transporters in plants under abiotic and biotic stresses: Current insights and future perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10864
Submitted
24 July 2025
Published
26-02-2026

Abstract

Nutrient transporters are integral membrane proteins that regulate the uptake, translocation and redistribution of essential nutrients in plants. Under abiotic and biotic stresses, their activity plays a pivotal role in maintaining ionic homeostasis, osmotic balance and stress signalling. This review explores how nutrient transporters respond to environmental cues and mediate stress tolerance. For instance, potassium transporters mediate stomatal closure under drought, maintain Na+/K+ homeostasis under salinity and facilitate structural adaptations such as adventitious root and aerenchyma formation under flooding. Similarly, plasma membrane H+-ATPase maintains membrane integrity under heat stress, while metal transporters regulate the uptake and detoxification of heavy metals. In response to biotic stress, calcium and silicon transporters enhance structural defences and stimulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Collectively, these mechanisms underscore the central role of nutrient transporters in plants under stress and highlight their potential as targets for engineering crops with improved nutrient use efficiency and stress tolerance.

References

  1. 1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. New York: United Nations; 2017. https://population.un.org/wpp/
  2. 2. Godoy F, Olivos-Hernandez K, Stange C, Handford M. Abiotic stress in crop species: Improving tolerance by applying plant metabolites. Plants. 2021;10(2):186. https://doi: 10.3390/plants10020186
  3. 3. Vishwakarma K, Mishra M, Patil G, Mulkey S, Ramawat N, Pratap Singh V, et al. Avenues of the membrane transport system in adaptation of plants to abiotic stresses. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39(7):861–83. https://doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1616669
  4. 4. Yadav B, Jogawat A, Lal SK, Lakra N, Mehta S, Shabek N, et al. Plant mineral transport systems and the potential for crop improvement. Planta. 2021;253(2):45. https://doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03551-7
  5. 5. Mishra G, Mohapatra SK, Rout GR. Plant membrane transporters function under abiotic stresses: A review. Planta. 2024;260(6):125. https://doi:10.1007/s00425-024-04548-2
  6. 6. Du B, Haensch R, Alfarraj S, Rennenberg H. Strategies of plants to overcome abiotic and biotic stresses. Biol Rev. 2024;99(4):1524–36. https://doi:10.1111/brv.13079
  7. 7. Jarzyniak KM, Jasinski M. Membrane transporters and drought resistance–a complex issue. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5(1):687. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00687
  8. 8. Shabala S, Pottosin I. Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: Implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol Plant. 2014;151(3):257–79. https://doi:10.1111/ppl.12165
  9. 9. Lata C, Prasad M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(14):4731–48. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/err210
  10. 10. Aslam R, Wali Q, Sarwar M, Naeem M, Zia M. A comprehensive overview of transcription factors (WRKY, NAC and BZIP) in plants. J Biosci. 2019;14(1):495–509. https://doi:10.12692/ijb/14.1.495-509
  11. 11. Paul S, Datta SK, Datta K. miRNA regulation of nutrient homeostasis in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:232. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00232
  12. 12. Straub T, Ludewig U, Neuhäuser B. The kinase CIPK23 inhibits ammonium transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2017;29(2):409–22. https://doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00806
  13. 13. Grubb LE, Derbyshire P, Dunning KE, Zipfel C, Menke FLH, Monaghan J. Large-scale identification of ubiquitination sites on membrane-associated proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2021;185(4):1483–88. https://doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab023
  14. 14. Singh P, Kumar K, Jha AK, Yadava P, Pal M, Rakshit S, et al. Global gene expression profiling under nitrogen stress identifies key genes involved in nitrogen stress adaptation in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci Rep. 2022;12:4211. https://doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07709-z
  15. 15. Sathee L, Jagadhesan B, Pandesha PH, Barman D, Adavi BS, Nagar S, et al. Genome editing targets for improving nutrient use efficiency and nutrient stress adaptation. Front Genet. 2022;13:900897. https://doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.900897
  16. 16. Zhang Y, Liu X, La S, Wang M, Hu X, Shi A, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals nutrient deprivation reduces nitrate content in lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. ramosa Hort.) and enhances nitrogen metabolism. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1585955. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1585955
  17. 17. Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Schwarz D, Franken P, Colla G. Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and assimilation in vegetable crops. In: Aroca R, editor. Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 171–195.
  18. 18. Barzana G, Carvajal M. Genetic regulation of water and nutrient transport in water stress tolerance in roots. J Biotechnol. 2020;324:134–42. https://doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.10.003
  19. 19. Goel P, Singh AK. Abiotic stresses downregulate key genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilation in Brassica juncea L. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143645. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143645
  20. 20. Orsel M, Krapp A, Daniel-Vedele F. Analysis of the NRT2 nitrate transporter family in Arabidopsis: Structure and gene expression. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(2):886–96. https://doi:10.1104/pp.005280
  21. 21. Sun T, Li M, Shao Y, Yu L, Ma F. Comprehensive genomic identification and expression analysis of the phosphate transporter (PHT) gene family in apple. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:426. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00426
  22. 22. Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, et al. Phosphate import in plants: Focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2:83. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2011.00083
  23. 23. Xu Q, Fu H, Zhu B, Hussain HA, Zhang K, Tian X, et al. Potassium improves drought stress tolerance in plants by affecting root morphology, root exudates and microbial diversity. Metabolites. 2021;11(3):131. https://doi:10.3390/metabo11030131
  24. 24. Liu C, Liao W. Potassium signaling in plant abiotic responses: Crosstalk with calcium and reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;173:110-21. https://doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.016
  25. 25. Cai K, Gao H, Wu X, Zhang S, Han Z, Chen X, et al. The ability to regulate transmembrane potassium transport in root is critical for drought tolerance in barley. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4111. https://doi:10.3390/ijms20174111
  26. 26. Liu H, Song S, Zhang H, Li Y, Niu L, Zhang J, et al. Signaling transduction of ABA, ROS and Ca2+ in plant stomatal closure in response to drought. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14824. https://doi:10.3390/ijms232314824
  27. 27. Choudhary S, Wani KI, Naeem M, Khan MMA, Aftab T. Cellular responses, osmotic adjustments and role of osmolytes in providing salt stress resilience in higher plants: polyamines and nitric oxide crosstalk. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(2):539–53. https://doi:10.1007/s00344-022-10584-7
  28. 28. Jogawat A. Osmolytes and their role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In: Smith J, editor. Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology. Hoboken: Wiley Online Library; 2019. p. 91–104.
  29. 29. Ketehouli T, Carther KFI, Noman M, Wang FW, Li XW, Li HY. Adaptation of plants to salt stress: characterization of Na+ and K+ transporters and role of CBL gene family in regulating salt stress response. Agronomy. 2019;9(11):687. https://doi:10.3390/agronomy9110687
  30. 30. Zhang Y, Fang J, Wu X, Dong L. Na+/K+ balance and transport regulatory mechanisms in weedy and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):375. https://doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1586-9
  31. 31. Ali A, Maggio A, Bressan RA, Yun DJ. Role and functional differences of HKT1-type transporters in plants under salt stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1059. https://doi:10.3390/ijms20051059
  32. 32. Pabuayon ICM, Jiang J, Qian H, Chung JS, Shi H. Gain-of-function mutations of AtNHX1 suppress sos1 salt sensitivity and improve salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Stress Biol. 2021;1(1):14. https://doi:10.1007/s44154-021-00014-1
  33. 33. Mansour MMF. Role of vacuolar membrane transport systems in plant salinity tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(4):1364–401. https://doi:10.1007/s00344-022-10655-9
  34. 34. Ullah MA, Abdullah-Zawawi MR, Sukiran NL, Uddin MI, Ismail I, Zainal Z. In silico approach to investigate the potential HKT gene responsive to salt stress in rice. CABI Agric Biosci. 2024;5:49. https://doi:10.1186/s43170-024-00256-9
  35. 35. Dave A, Agarwal P, Agarwal PK. Mechanism of high-affinity potassium transporter (HKT) towards improved crop productivity in saline agricultural lands. 3 Biotech. 2022;12(2):51. https://doi:10.1007/s13205-021-03092-0
  36. 36. Huang S, Spielmeyer W, Lagudah ES, Munns R. Comparative mapping of HKT genes in wheat, barley and rice, key determinants of Na+ transport and salt tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(4):927–37. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/ern033
  37. 37. Chen CZ, Lv XF, Li JY, Yi HY, Gong JM. Arabidopsis NRT1.5 is another essential component in the regulation of nitrate reallocation and stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2012;159(4):1582–90. https://doi: 10.1104/pp.112.199257
  38. 38. Lin SH, Kuo HF, Canivenc G, Lin CS, Lepetit M, Hsu PK, et al. Mutation of the Arabidopsis NRT1.5 nitrate transporter causes defective root-to-shoot nitrate transport. Plant Cell. 2008;20(9):2514–28. https://doi:10.1105/tpc.108.060244
  39. 39. Li JY, Fu YL, Pike SM, Bao J, Tian W, Zhang Y, et al. The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT1.8 functions in nitrate removal from the xylem sap and mediates cadmium tolerance. Plant Cell. 2010;22(5):1633–46. https://doi:10.1105/tpc.110.075242
  40. 40. Hussain HA, Men S, Hussain S, Chen Y, Ali S, Zhang S, et al. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3890. https://doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40362-7
  41. 41. Lillo C. Signalling cascades integrating light-enhanced nitrate metabolism. Biochem J. 2008;415(1):11–19. https://doi:10.1042/BJ20081115
  42. 42. Huang B, Rachmilevitch S, Xu J. Root carbon and protein metabolism associated with heat tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(9):3455–65. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/ers003
  43. 43. Liu Y, Liu H, Pan Q, Yang H, Zhan J, Huang W. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase is related to the development of salicylic acid-induced thermotolerance in pea leaves. Planta. 2009;229(5):1087–98. https://doi:10.1007/s00425-009-0897-3
  44. 44. Poidevin L, Forment J, Unal D, Ferrando A. Transcriptome and translatome changes in germinated pollen under heat stress uncover roles of transporter genes involved in pollen tube growth. Plant Cell Environ. 2021;44(7):2167-84. https://doi:10.1111/pce.13972
  45. 45. Giri A, Heckathorn S, Mishra S, Krause C. Heat stress decreases levels of nutrient-uptake and assimilation proteins in tomato roots. Plants. 2017;6(1):6. https://doi:10.3390/plants6010006
  46. 46. Tarafdar S, Chowdhary G. Translating the Arabidopsis thaliana peroxisome proteome insights to Solanum lycopersicum: Consensus versus diversity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10(1):909604. https://doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.909604
  47. 47. Raju SKK, Barnes AC, Schnable JC, Roston RL. Low-temperature tolerance in land plants: Are transcript and membrane responses conserved? Plant Sci. 2018;276(1):73–86. https://doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.08.002
  48. 48. Li Y, Zhu J, Xu J, Zhang X, Xie Z, Li Z. Effect of cold stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and molecular mechanism analysis in cold-resistant cotton (ZM36) seedlings. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15(1):1396666. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1396666
  49. 49. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant Physiology and Development. 6th ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Incorporated; 2015.
  50. 50. Qian Z, He L, Li F. Understanding cold stress response mechanisms in plants: An overview. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15(1):1443317. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1443317
  51. 51. Semmar N. Temperature-linked constraints and plant protection responses. In: Secondary Metabolites in Plant Stress Adaptation: Analytic Space of Secondary Metabolites. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024. p. 155–219. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52595-7_7
  52. 52. Mishra S, Spaccarotella K, Gido J, Samanta I, Chowdhary G. Effects of heat stress on plant-nutrient relations: An update on nutrient uptake, transport and assimilation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(21):15670. https://doi:10.3390/ijms242115670
  53. 53. Ihnatowicz A, Siwinska J, Meharg AA, Carey M, Koornneef M, Reymond M. Conserved histidine of metal transporter AtNRAMP1 is crucial for optimal plant growth under manganese deficiency at chilling temperatures. New Phytol. 2014;202(4):1173–83. https://doi:10.1111/nph.12737
  54. 54. Catalá R, Santos E, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Martínez-Zapater JM, Salinas J. Mutations in the Ca2+/H+ transporter CAX1 increase CBF/DREB1 expression and the cold-acclimation response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15(12):2940–51. https://doi:10.1105/tpc.015248
  55. 55. Feng D, Wang X, Gao J, Zhang C, Liu H, Liu P, et al. Exogenous calcium: Its mechanisms and research advances involved in plant stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14(1):1143963. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1143963
  56. 56. Zulfiqar U, Jiang W, Xiukang W, Hussain S, Ahmad M, Maqsood MF, et al. Cadmium phytotoxicity, tolerance and advanced remediation approaches in agricultural soils: A comprehensive review. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13(1):773815. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.773815
  57. 57. Veraestrella R, Gomezmendez MF, Amezcuaromero JC, Barkla BJ, Rosassantiago P, Pantoja O. Cadmium and zinc activate adaptive mechanisms in Nicotiana tabacum similar to those observed in metal-tolerant plants. Planta. 2017;246(3):433–51. https://doi:10.1007/s00425-017-2700-1
  58. 58. Manghwar H, Hussain A, Alam I, Khoso MA, Ali Q, Liu F. Waterlogging stress in plants: Unraveling the mechanisms and impacts on growth, development and productivity. Environ Exp Bot. 2024;224(1):105824. https://doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105824
  59. 59. Ishikawa T, Cuin TA, Bazihizina N, Shabala S. Xylem ion loading and its implications for plant abiotic stress tolerance. Adv Bot Res. 2018;87(1):267–301. https://doi:10.1016/bs.abr.2018.09.006
  60. 60. Colmer TD, Greenway H. Ion transport in seminal and adventitious roots of cereals during O₂ deficiency. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(1):39–57. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erq271
  61. 61. Sedbrook JC, Kronebusch PJ, Borisy GG, Trewavas AJ, Masson PH. Transgenic AEQUORIN reveals organ-specific cytosolic Ca2+ responses to anoxia in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1996;111(1):243–57. https://doi:10.1104/pp.111.1.243
  62. 62. Huang X, Shabala L, Zhang X, Zhou M, Voesenek LA, Hartman S, et al. Cation transporters in cell fate determination and plant adaptive responses to a low-oxygen environment. J Exp Bot. 2022;73(3):636–45. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erab480
  63. 63. Wang F, Chen ZH, Liu X, Colmer TD, Shabala L, Salih A, et al. Revealing the roles of GORK channels and NADPH oxidase in acclimation to hypoxia in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(12):3191–204. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erw378
  64. 64. Park CJ, Shin R. Calcium channels and transporters: Roles in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13(1):964059. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.964059
  65. 65. Prasad D, Singh R, Singh A. Management of sheath blight of rice with integrated nutrients. Indian Phytopathol. 2010;63(1):11–15. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IPPJ/article/view/11033
  66. 66. Verbon EH, Trapet PL, Stringlis IA, Kruijs S, Bakker PA, Pieterse CM. Iron and immunity. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017;55(1):355–75. https://doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035537
  67. 67. Schmidt SB, Husted S. The biochemical properties of manganese in plants. Plants. 2019;8(10):381. https://doi:10.3390/plants8100381
  68. 68. Mandlik R, Thakral V, Raturi G, Shinde S, Nikolić M, Tripathi DK, et al. Significance of silicon uptake, transport and deposition in plants. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(21):6703–18. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa301
  69. 69. Hsu PK, Tsay YF. Two phloem nitrate transporters, NRT1.11 and NRT1.12, are important for redistributing xylem-borne nitrate to enhance plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2013;163(2):844–56. https://doi:10.1104/pp.113.226563
  70. 70. Zoghbi-Rodríguez NM, Gamboa-Tuz SD, Pereira-Santana A, Rodríguez-Zapata LC, Sánchez-Teyer LF, Echevarría-Machado I. Phylogenomic and microsynteny analysis provides evidence of genome arrangements of high-affinity nitrate transporter gene families of plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(23):13036. https://doi:10.3390/ijms222313036
  71. 71. Hao DL, Zhou JY, Yang SY, Qi W, Yang KJ, Su YH. Function and regulation of ammonium transporters in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(10):3557. https://doi:10.3390/ijms21103557
  72. 72. Wang Y, Wang F, Lu H, Liu Y, Mao C. Phosphate uptake and transport in plants: An elaborate regulatory system. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021;62(4):564–72. https://doi:10.1093/pcp/pcab011
  73. 73. Ragel P, Raddatz N, Leidi EO, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM. Regulation of K+ nutrition in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10(1):281. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00281
  74. 74. Bakshi A, Gilroy S. Moving magnesium. Mol Plant. 2022;15(5):796–98. https://doi:10.1016/j.molp.2022.04.002
  75. 75. Takahashi H. Sulfate transport systems in plants: Functional diversity and molecular mechanisms underlying regulatory coordination. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(16):4075–87. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erz132
  76. 76. Khan S, Kaur K, Kumar V, Tiwari S. Iron transport and homeostasis in plants: Current updates and applications for improving human nutrition values and sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2023;100(2):373–84. https://doi:10.1007/s10725-023-00979-1
  77. 77. Alejandro S, Höller S, Meier B, Peiter E. Manganese in plants: From acquisition to subcellular allocation. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11(1):300. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00300
  78. 78. Printz B, Lutts S, Hausman JF, Sergeant K. Copper trafficking in plants and its implication on cell wall dynamics. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7(1):601. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00601
  79. 79. Tufino VO, Casellas MA, Flis P, Salt DE, Schat H, Aarts MGM. Arabidopsis thaliana Zn transporter genes ZIP3 and ZIP5 provide the main Zn uptake route and act redundantly to face Zn deficiency. Plant J. 2025;121(3):e17251. https://doi:10.1111/tpj.17251
  80. 80. Liu B, Yu H, Yang Q, Ding L, Sun F, Qu J, et al. Zinc transporter ZmLAZ1-4 modulates zinc homeostasis on plasma and vacuolar membrane in maize. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:881055. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.881055
  81. 81. Zhang J, Liu S, Liu CB, Zhang M, Fu XQ, Wang YL, et al. Natural variants of molybdate transporters contribute to yield traits of soybean by affecting auxin synthesis. Curr Biol. 2023;33(24):5355. https://doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.072
  82. 82. Onuh AF, Miwa K. Regulation, diversity and evolution of boron transporters in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021;62(4):590–99. https://doi:10.1093/pcp/pcab025
  83. 83. Ma Q, Zhao C, Hu S, Zuo K. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK6 regulates drought tolerance under high nitrogen by the phosphorylation of NRT1.1. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(18):5682–93. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erad277
  84. 84. Bassett CL, Baldo AM, Moore JT, Jenkins RM, Soffe DS, Wisniewski ME, et al. Genes responding to water deficit in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14(1):182. https://doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-182
  85. 85. Eragam A, Mohapatra A, Shukla V, Kadumuri RV, George AP, Putta L, et al. Panicle transcriptome of high-yield mutant indica rice reveals physiological mechanisms and novel candidate regulatory genes for yield under reproductive stage drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):493. https://doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04507-1
  86. 86. Duan J, Tian H, Gao Y. Expression of nitrogen transporter genes in roots of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to soil drought with contrasting nitrogen supplies. Crop Pasture Sci. 2016;67(2):128–36. https://doi:10.1071/CP15152
  87. 87. Zhang C, Meng S, Li M, Zhao Z. Genomic identification and expression analysis of the phosphate transporter gene family in poplar. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7(1):1398. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01398
  88. 88. Li Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Wang S, Ye X, Shi L, et al. Molecular identification of the phosphate transporter family 1 (PHT1) genes and their expression profiles in response to phosphorus deprivation and other abiotic stresses in Brassica napus. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220374. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220374
  89. 89. Ahmad I, Mian A, Maathuis FJ. Overexpression of the rice AKT1 potassium channel affects potassium nutrition and rice drought tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(9):2689–98. https://doi:10.1093/jxb/erw103
  90. 90. Khan IU, Ali A, Yun DJ. Arabidopsis NHX transporters: Sodium and potassium antiport mythology and sequestration during ionic stress. J Plant Biol. 2018;61:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-018-0244-y
  91. 91. Li Y, Feng Z, Wei H, Cheng S, Hao P, Yu S, et al. Silencing of GhKEA4 and GhKEA12 revealed their potential functions under salt and potassium stresses in upland cotton. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:789775. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.789775
  92. 92. Guo Y, Zhu C, Tian Z. Overexpression of KvCHX enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(12):9692–708. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45120605
  93. 93. Chen ZC, Yamaji N, Horie T, Che J, Li J, An G, et al. A magnesium transporter OsMGT1 plays a critical role in salt tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2017;174(3):1837–49. https://doi:10.1104/pp.17.00532
  94. 94. Nino MC, Nogoy FM, KwonKyoo KK, Cho CY. Low-affinity cation transporter 1 improves salt stress tolerance in Japonica rice. Plant Breed Biotech. 2018;6:82–93. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2018.6.1.82
  95. 95. Chen Y, Li G, Yang J, Zhao X, Sun Z, Hou H. Role of NRAMP transporter genes of Spirodela polyrhiza in cadmium accumulation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;227:112907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112907
  96. 96. Tan L, Zhu Y, Fan T, Peng C, Wang J, Sun L, et al. OsZIP7 functions in xylem loading in roots and inter-vascular transfer in nodes to deliver Zn/Cd to grain in rice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;512(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.03.024
  97. 97. Yang J, Mathew IE, Rhein H, Barker R, Guo Q, Brunello L, et al. The vacuolar H+/Ca2+ transporter CAX1 participates in submergence and anoxia stress responses. Plant Physiol. 2022;190(4):2617–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac457
  98. 98. Wang J, Liu XI, Zhang AN, Ren Y, Wu F, Wang G, et al. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel mediates cytoplasmic calcium elevation and disease resistance in rice. Cell Res. 2019;29(10):820–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-019-0219-7
  99. 99. Nakata Y, Ueno M, Kihara J, Ichii M, Taketa S, Arase S. Rice blast disease and susceptibility to pests in a silicon uptake-deficient mutant lsi1 of rice. Crop Prot. 2008;27(3–5):865–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.08.016

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.