Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Response of new insecticides against major insect pests of tomato in West Shoa, Ethiopia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11827
Submitted
17 September 2025
Published
10-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

The tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is cultivated in different parts of Ethiopia in the field as well as in the glasshouse for consumption and processing. Helicoverpa armigera, Tuta absoluta and Liriomyza spp. are damaging insect pests, specifically the tomato crop. In the present study, the laboratory and glasshouse studies were carried out at the Ambo University laboratory, whereas the field experiments were carried out in 2 districts of West Shoa of Ethiopia. The experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new insecticides against T. absoluta, H. armigera and Liriomyza spp. on tomato crops. The laboratory results showed that the tested insecticides were significantly (p £ 0.05) different after 72 hr of treatment application. The mean mortality was obtained by Benezer Plus 38.5 % E.C and Delta 2.5 % E.C at maximum rate which proved the most effective and gave ((84.03 ± 1.57; 84.42 ± 1.46 %), (85.03 ± 1.48; 84.02 ± 1.59 %) and (78.27 ± 1.27; 68.03 ± 1.18 %)) against T. absoluta, H. armigera and Liriomyza spp. respectively. The glasshouse and field results also revealed that there was a significant reduction in the larval population of T. absoluta, H. armigera and Liriomyza spp. in protected plots as compared to unprotected plots after spraying of insecticides, which ultimately increased the % of marketable yield in sprayed plots. Therefore, the combination of Phenthoate and Emamectin benzoate (Benezer plus 38.5 % E.C) and Deltamethrin (Delta 2.5 % E.C) was found more effective at the maximum rate against T. absoluta, H. armigera and Liriomyza spp. on tomato crops in the glasshouse as well as under open farmers' field conditions. Therefore, these findings could guide farmers and policymakers in selecting cost-effective insecticide regimes.

 

References

  1. 1. FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Commodities Production. 2022. http://faostat.fao.org
  2. 2. Yeabsira TD. Assessment of fruit and vegetable export performance in Ethiopia (Thesis). Mekelle: Mekelle University; 2014.
  3. 3. Abdussamee H, Hussain M, Ali M, Siddique MS, Jato SU, Shahbaz K. Genetic response of tomato germplasm against early blight and its management through fungicides. Appl Sci Rep. 2014;2(3):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.08.011
  4. 4. Mehraj H, Mutahera S, Roni MZK, Nahiyan ASM, Jamal Uddin AFM. Performance assessment of twenty tomato cultivars for summer cultivation in Bangladesh. J Sci Technol Environ Inform. 2014;1(1):45–53. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3610751
  5. 5. Kaur H, Kaur H, Rishi P. Nematicidal effect of neem and Bt on Meloidogyne incognita infesting tomato plant by seed dressing treatment. Discovery Agric. 2014;2(6):28–40. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto
  6. 6. Baloch FA. Vegetable crops. In: Horticulture. Islamabad: National Book Foundation; 1974. p. 508.
  7. 7. Bhowmik D, Sampath KP, Kumar KP, Paswan S, Srivastava S. Tomato: A natural medicine and its health benefits. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2012;1(1):33–43. http://www.phytojournal.com
  8. 8. Adda B. Tomatoes 101: Nutrition facts and health benefits. 2019. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/foods/tomatoes
  9. 9. Megido RC, Haubruge E, Verheggen FJ. First evidence of deuterotokous parthenogenesis in the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J Pest Sci. 2012;85(4):409–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-012-0458-6
  10. 10. Desneux N, Luna MG, Guillemaud T, Urbaneja A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond the new threat to tomato world production. J Pest Sci. 2011;84(4):403–08. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-011-0384-z
  11. 11. Tonnang HEZ, Mohamed SF, Khamis F, Ekesi S. Identification and risk assessment for worldwide invasion and spread of Tuta absoluta with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa: implications for phytosanitary measures and management. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0138319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138319
  12. 12. Al-Khateeb SA, Al-Jabr AM. Effect of leafminer Liriomyza trifolii Burgess Diptera: Agromyzidae on gas exchange capacity of cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. grown under greenhouse conditions. Acta Hortic. 2006;710:423–28. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.710.51
  13. 13. Li C, Qinqin W, Haoliang Q, Qiyuan W, Huizhu Y, Changhui R. Resistance selection of indoxacarb in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Cross-resistance, biochemical mechanisms and associated fitness costs. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74(12):2636–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5056
  14. 14. González-Cabrera J, Mollá O, Montón H, Urbaneja A. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) in controlling the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Bio Control. 2011;56(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-010-9310-1
  15. 15. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.3 User's Guide. 2nd ed. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2013.
  16. 16. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  17. 17. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18(2):265–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a
  18. 18. Tomlin CDS. The pesticide manual. 15th ed. Alton: British Crop Production Council; 2009.
  19. 19. Tatagar MH, Mohankumar HD, Shivaprasad M, Mesta RK. Bio-efficacy of flubendiamide 20 WG against chilli fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) and Spodoptera litura (Fb.). Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2009;22(3):579–81.
  20. 20. Abbas G, Hassan N, Farhan M, Haq I, Karar H. Effect of selected insecticides on Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) and their successful management. Adv Entomol. 2015;3(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2015.31003
  21. 21. Bawin T, De Backer L, Dujeu D. Infestation level influences oviposition site selection in the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insects. 2014;5(4):877–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877
  22. 22. Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, recommendations for sustainable and effective resistance management. 2010. http://www.irac-online.org
  23. 23. Siqueira HAA, Guedes RNC, Picanco MC. Cartap resistance and synergism in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J Appl Entomol. 2000;124(5-6):233–38. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00470.x
  24. 24. Balzan MV, Moonen A. Management strategies for the control of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) damage in open-field cultivations of processing tomato in Tuscany (Italy). EPPO Bull. 2012;42(2):217–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.2558
  25. 25. Silva GA, Picanço MC, Bacci L, Crespo ALB, Rosado JF, Guedes RNC. Control failure likelihood and spatial dependence of insecticide resistance in the tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67(8):913–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2131
  26. 26. Bawin T, Dujeu D, De Backer L, Francis F, Verheggen F. Ability of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to develop on alternative host plant species. Can Entomol. 2016;148(4):434–42. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2015.59
  27. 27. Worthing CR. The Pesticide Manual: A world compendium. 8th ed. Thornton Heath: British Crop Protection Council; 1987.
  28. 28. Haug G, Hoffmann H, editors. Chemistry of Plant Protection. Vol. 4, Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticides: Structures and Properties. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
  29. 29. Shafiq AM, Maher AM. Influence of insecticides against onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) on onion crop. J Insect Sci. 2016;29(1):179–85.
  30. 30. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta: pest fact sheet. Ottawa: CFIA; 2010.
  31. 31. Öztemiz S. The tomato leafminer ((Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)) and it's biological control. KSU J Nat Sci. 2012;15(4):47–57.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.