Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Phenotypic screening of brinjal genotypes for excess moisture stress tolerance during reproductive growth

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13686
Submitted
15 January 2026
Published
24-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

The growth, physiology and yield stability of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.) are significantly impacted by excessive moisture stress during the reproductive stage, especially in humid and poorly drained settings. The goal of the current study was to categorise brinjal genotypes by their response patterns and to identify key phenotypic features associated with resistance to excess moisture stress. A completely randomized design (CRD) was used to assess 40 genetically distinct brinjal genotypes under controlled polyhouse conditions. At the onset of flowering, excess moisture stress was imposed for six consecutive days by maintaining continuous waterlogging with approximately 5 cm standing water above the soil surface, whereas control plants were irrigated to near field capacity without water stagnation. Leaf area (LA), number of leaves per plant (NL), root characteristics, total biomass (TB), Soil and plant analyser development (SPAD), chlorophyll content, canopy temperature (CT) and tolerance score were among the morphological and physiological characteristics recorded. Tolerance score showed a strong negative correlation with CT and positive correlations with LA, root length (RL), root volume (RV), root dry weight (RDW), NL and TB, as indicated by the correlation analysis. 83.6 % of the total phenotypic variance was explained by the first four principal components (PCs) in principal component analysis (PCA), with PC1 primarily reflecting an integrated growth vigour and tolerance axis. Divergent tolerance strategies were reflected in the classification of genotypes into susceptible (S), moderately tolerant (MT) and tolerant (T) groups using hierarchical cluster analysis. Under stress, T genotypes showed improved growth maintenance, strong root systems, advantageous physiological characteristics and reduced CT. Overall, the study provides reliable indirect selection criteria for breeding programs aimed at enhancing stress resistance and shows that coordinated morphological and physiological features, rather than a single attribute, govern tolerance to excess moisture stress in brinjal.

References

  1. 1. Daunay MC. Eggplant. In: Prohens J, Nuez F, editors. Vegetables II. Handbook of Plant Breeding. Vol. 2. New York (NY): Springer; 2008. p. 163–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74110-9_5
  2. 2. Hanson PM, Yang RY, Tsou SCS, Ledesma D, Engle L, Lee TC. Diversity in eggplant (Solanum melongena) for superoxide scavenging activity, total phenolics and ascorbic acid. J Food Compost Anal. 2006;19(6-7):594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.03.001
  3. 3. Bailey-Serres J, Lee SC, Brinton E. Waterproofing crops: effective flooding survival strategies. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(4):1698–709. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208173
  4. 4. Yamauchi T, Colmer TD, Pedersen O, Nakazono M. Regulation of root traits for internal aeration and tolerance to soil waterlogging-flooding stress. Plant Physiol. 2018;176(2):1118–30. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01157
  5. 5. Setter TL, Waters I. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant Soil. 2003;253:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024573305997
  6. 6. Fukao T, Barrera-Figueroa BE, Juntawong P, Peña-Castro JM. Submergence and waterlogging stress in plants: a review highlighting research opportunities and understudied aspects. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00340
  7. 7. Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161(11):1189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
  8. 8. Bhatt RM, Laxman RH, Singh TH, Divya MH, Rao AN. Response of brinjal genotypes to drought and flooding stress. Veg Sci. 2014;41:116–24.
  9. 9. Pailles Y, Awlia M, Julkowska M, Passone L, Zemmouri K, Negrão S, et al. Diverse traits contribute to salinity tolerance of wild tomato seedlings from the Galapagos Islands. Plant Physiol. 2020;182(1):534–46. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00700
  10. 10. Negrão S, Schmöckel SM, Tester M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot. 2017;119(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191
  11. 11. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651-81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  12. 12. Cuartero J, Romero-Aranda R, Yeo AR, Flowers TJ. Variability for some physiological characters affecting salt tolerance in tomato. Acta Hortic. 2002;573:435–41. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.573.52
  13. 13. Choudhury S, Kayes A, Rahman N, Ahmmad S, Islam N, Shawon TA. Effect of waterlogging at different growth stages on growth, yield and biochemical characteristics of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Eur J Appl Sci. 2025;13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.14738/aivp.1301.18100
  14. 14. Ahmed F, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Juraimi AS, Rahim HA, Asfaliza R, et al. Waterlogging tolerance of crops: breeding, mechanism of tolerance, molecular approaches and future prospects. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:963525. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/963525
  15. 15. Sarker KK, Quamruzzaman AKM, Uddin MN, Rahman A, Quddus MA, Biswas SK, et al. Evaluation of 10 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for development of cultivars suitable for short-term waterlogged conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2023;75:179-92.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00688-1
  17. 16. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. Water Relations of Plants and Soils. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012425060-4/50003-6
  18. 17. Yang X, Jiang Z, He J, Shen L. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics unveils protein dynamics in the root of Solanum melongena L. under waterlogging stress conditions. Life. 2023;13(6):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061399
  19. 18. Kozlowski TT. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol. 1997;17(7):490–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.7.490
  20. 19. Yeboah MA, Xiong Z, Akromah R. Screening for waterlogging tolerance in maize. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7:4562-8.
  21. 20. Blum A. Plant breeding for water-limited environments. New York (NY): Springer; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4
  22. 21. Lynch JP. Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann Bot. 2013;112(2):347-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs293
  23. 22. Passioura JB. The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):113–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl212
  24. 23. Jackson RD, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Pinter PJ. Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resour Res. 1981;17(4):1133–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i004p01133
  25. 24. Blum A, Mayer J, Gozlan G. Infrared thermal sensing of plant canopies as a screening technique for dehydration avoidance in wheat. Field Crops Res. 1982;5(2):137–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(82)90014-4
  26. 25. Comas LH, Becker SR, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig DA. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00442

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.