Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Random amplified polymorphic DNA-based assessment of genetic variation in natural and cultivated allspice (Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr.) populations in Guatemala

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15226
Submitted
24 April 2026
Published
28-09-2026

Abstract

The fruit of the allspice tree (Pimenta dioica (L.) Merr.) is a valuable non-timber forest product traded for its flavour, oils and secondary metabolites. Intense selection pressure from traditional harvesting methods has favoured low-height, high-yield phenotypes, potentially impacting genetic diversity. Although phenotypic variations have been observed, no baseline molecular genetic assessments have been conducted in Guatemala to evaluate the impact of these practices. This study assessed the genetic diversity and structure of natural and cultivated populations of allspice in Guatemala using molecular markers. Seven populations from northern Guatemala, representing a range of ecological conditions, were analysed using 15 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers. A total of 126 amplified fragments, with 88.1 % polymorphism, were obtained. The RAPD markers showed high levels of polymorphism (Polymorphic information content (PIC) = 0.331), good discriminatory power (D = 0.907) and reasonable resolving power (Rp = 3.976). Estimates of genetic diversity, based on Nei’s gene diversity (He) and Shannon’s diversity index (H), were slightly higher in natural populations (He = 0.24–0.28; H = 0.35–0.40) than in cultivated populations (He = 0.17–0.22; H = 0.23–0.31), suggesting that natural populations maintain greater genetic variability, due to lower levels of human intervention. Population structuring methods, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC), sparse non-negative matrix factorisation (sNMF)) revealed genetic similarity among most populations, with San Cristobal being the exception, showing significant differentiation (p < 0.05). These findings highlight the importance of implementing integrated conservation strategies (in situ, circa situ and ex situ methods), as well as sustainable management of naturally regenerated and cultivated populations, to preserve the Guatemalan gene pool of  P. dioica.

References

  1. 1. El-Nashar HAS, Ali AM, Salem YH. Genus Pimenta: an updated comprehensive review on botany, distribution, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and biological approaches. Chem Biodivers. 2023;20(12):e202300855. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202300855
  2. 2. Chinchilla-García JJ. Inventory and management proposal for populations of allspice (Pimenta dioica (L.) Merrill) and sapodilla (Manilkara achras (Mill.) Fosberg) in the special use zone of Yaxhá National Park, within the Maya Biosphere Reserve. [thesis]. Guatemala: Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; 2004.
  3. 3. Parker T. Trees of Guatemala. Austin (TX): The Tree Press; 2008.
  4. 4. Machuca P, Pulido-Salas MT, Trabanino F. Past and present of allspice (Pimenta dioica) in Mexico and Guatemala. Rev Ethnoecol. 2020;18:1–18. https://doi.org/10.4000/ethnoecologie.6261
  5. 5. Fremout T, Thomas E, Taedoumg H, Briers S, Gutiérrez Miranda CE, Alcázar Caicedo C, et al. Diversity for Restoration (D4R): guiding the selection of tree species and seed sources for climate resilient restoration of tropical forest landscapes. J Appl Ecol. 2022;59(3):664–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14079
  6. 6. Bidyananda N, Jamir I, Nowakowska K, Varte V, Vendrame WA, Devi RS, et al. Plant genetic diversity studies: insights from DNA marker analyses. Int J Plant Biol. 2024;15(3):607–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030046
  7. 7. Goswami BO, Rankawat R, Gadi BR. Morphological and molecular markers based assessment of genetic diversity of a valuable endemic plant Lasiurus sindicus Henr. in the arid region of Rajasthan, India. Arid Land Res Manag. 2022;36(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2021.2012728
  8. 8. Özbek Ö. Molecular markers used to reveal genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in crop plants. OBM Genet. 2024;8(4):274. https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.genet.2404274
  9. 9. Cruz W, Saldaña C, Ramos H, Baselly Villanueva JR, Cancán Loli J, Cuellar-Bautista JE. Genetic structure of natural populations of Cedrelinga cateniformis "tornillo" from the oriental region of Peru. Sci Agropecu. 2020;11(4):521–8. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.04.07
  10. 10. Tijerino A, Callejas L, Cerda-Granados DA. Assessment of genetic diversity in five Nicaraguan populations of Cedrela odorata L. (Meliaceae) using RAPD markers. Encuentro. 2016;103:28–39.
  11. https://doi.org/10.5377/encuentro.v0i103.2690
  12. 11. Hamdan YAS, Hawamda AI, Badran L, Daraghmeh E, Marí L, Khalaf A, et al. Exploring genetic variations among Palestinian watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) germplasm using RAPD molecular markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2024;94:829–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-024-01612-5
  13. 12. Hromadová Z, Gálová Z, Mikolášová L, Balázová Z, Vivodík M, Chnapek M. Efficiency of RAPD and SCoT markers in the genetic diversity assessment of the common bean. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(15):2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152763
  14. 13. Niklas A, Olszewska D. Application of the RAPD technique to identify genetic diversity in cultivated forms of Capsicum annuum L. Biotechnologia. 2021;102(2):209-23. https://doi.org/10.5114/bta.2021.106523
  15. 14. Mathpal S, Joshi R, Bhatt B, Sahoo B, Joshi S. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) molecular markers as a valuable tool to confirm the genetic diversity in soybean germplasms (Glycine max). Indian J Agric Res. 2024;58:1011–7. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6176
  16. 15. Sudhir S, Velmani Vel S, Selvam H, Arunprasath A. Using RAPD and ISSR markers to assess genetic diversity and conservation of Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lam. for sustainable management on Kerala's West Coast. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2024;12(6):105–11. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2024.184346
  17. 16. Holdridge LR. Life zone ecology. Rev ed. San José: Tropical Science Center; 1967.
  18. 17. Massicotte P, South A. rnaturalearth: world map data from Natural Earth. R package version 1.0.1. 2023.
  19. 18. Hollister JW. elevatr: access elevation data from various APIs. R package version 0.99.0. 2023.
  20. 19. Dunnington D. ggspatial: spatial data framework for ggplot2. R package version 1.1.9. 2023.
  21. 20. Goyal P, Jain R, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL. Assessment of genetic diversity in Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. germplasm using RAPD and ISSR markers. Trees (Berl). 2015;29(3):637–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1141-8
  22. 21. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32(3):314–31.
  23. 22. Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. iMEC: online marker efficiency calculator. Appl Plant Sci. 2018;6(6):e1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1159
  24. 23. Meirmans PG. Genodive version 3.0: easy-to-use software for the analysis of genetic data of diploids and polyploids. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):1126–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13145
  25. 24. Lynch M, Milligan BG. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol. 1994;3(2):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00109.x
  26. 25. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W256–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz239
  27. 26. Frichot E, Mathieu F, Trouillon T, Bouchard G, Francois O. Fast and efficient estimation of individual ancestry coefficients. Genetics. 2014;196(4):973–83. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.160572
  28. 27. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
  29. 28. Ruiz-Chután JA, Kalousová M, Lojka B, Colocho-Hernández S, Prado-Córdova JP, Montes L, et al. Impacts of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity of the endangered Guatemalan fir (Abies guatemalensis Rehder). Genetica. 2024;153(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-024-00225-0
  30. 29. Grünwald NJ, Hoheisel GA. Hierarchical analysis of diversity, selfing and genetic differentiation in populations of the oomycete Aphanomyces euteiches. Phytopathology. 2006;96(10):1134–41. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-1134
  31. 30. Bougeard S, Dray S. Supervised multiblock analysis in R with the ade4 package. J Stat Softw. 2018;86(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v086.i01
  32. 31. Boshier DH, Chase MR, Bawa KS. Population genetics of Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae), a neotropical tree. 3. Gene flow, neighborhood and population substructure. Am J Bot. 1995;82(4):484–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb15668.x
  33. 32. Khan S, Vaishali, Sharma V. Genetic differentiation and diversity analysis of medicinal tree Syzygium cumini (Myrtaceae) from ecologically different regions of India. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2010;16(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-010-0016-8
  34. 33. Coser SM, Ferreira MFS, Ferreira A, Mitre LK, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR. Assessment of genetic diversity in Psidium guajava L. using different approaches. Sci Hortic. 2012;148:223–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.030
  35. 34. Sinha D, Singh J, Tandon PK, Kakkar P. Genetic diversity of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. collected from different Himalayan regions of India assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Toxicol Int. 2013;20(3):208–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.121667
  36. 35. Saldaña CL, Cancan JD, Cruz W, Correa MY, Ramos M, Cuellar E, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of capirona (Calycophyllum spruceanum Benth.) from the Peruvian Amazon revealed by RAPD markers. Forests. 2021;12(8):1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081125
  37. 36. Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S. Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(18):3737–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03435.x
  38. 37. Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(5):1143–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x
  39. 38. Salgotra RK, Chauhan BS. Genetic diversity, conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Genes (Basel). 2023;14(1):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010174
  40. 39. Tuisima-Coral LL, Cepková PH, Weber JC, Lojka B. Preliminary evidence for domestication effects on the genetic diversity of Guazuma crinita in the Peruvian Amazon. Forests. 2020;11(8):795. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080795
  41. 40. Li YR, Fritsch PW, Zhao GG, Cheng XJ, Ding ZL, Lu L. Population differentiation and dynamics of five pioneer species of Gaultheria from the secondary forests in subtropical China. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):516. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05189-z
  42. 41. Carvalho C, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Ribeiro MC, Correa Cortez M, Souza A, Garcia Collevati R. Climatic stability and contemporary human impacts affect the genetic diversity and conservation status of a tropical palm in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Conserv Genet. 2017;18(2):467–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0921-7
  43. 42. Martin SL, Benedict L, Wei W, Sauder CA, Beckie HJ, Hall LM. High gene flow maintains genetic diversity following selection for high EPSPS copy number in the weed kochia (Amaranthaceae). Sci Rep. 2020;10:18864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75345-6
  44. 43. Dawson IK, Guariguata MR, Loo J, Weber JC, Lengkeer A, Bush D, et al. What is the relevance of smallholders' agroforestry systems for conserving tropical tree species and genetic diversity in circa situ, in situ and ex situ settings? A review. Biodivers Conserv. 2013;22(2):301–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0429-5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.