Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Genetic basis and breeding potential of fruit traits in interspecific F2 populations of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. & Nakai × Citrullus amarus Schrad.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16163
Submitted
18 June 2026
Published
24-08-2026
Versions

Abstract

Watermelon is an economically important fruit crop cultivated worldwide for its nutritional value and commercial importance. However, yield stagnation and limited genetic diversity constrain further productivity gains. To address this constraint, the present study evaluates genetic variability, heritability and the breeding potential of key fruit traits in watermelon using two interspecific F2  populations developed from crosses between a wild Citrullus amarus Schrad. line and two elite Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. & Nakai lines, with the objective of harnessing untapped allelic diversity for crop improvement. Two F2 populations, CL 0732 × CL 0413 (Cross 1 (C1)) and CL 0732 × CL 0695 (Cross 2 (C2)), were evaluated for fruit length, fruit width, rind thickness, total soluble solids (TSS) and fruit weight using standard statistical parameters, including genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation, heritability, genetic advance and transgressive segregation index (TSI). Results revealed substantial genetic variability, with high GCV (18.09–85.71 %) and heritability (70.43–97.67 %) across traits, indicating strong additive gene action. While the C2 population exhibited higher trait means, C1 demonstrated superior breeding potential based on standardised range, TSI and usefulness index, suggesting a greater likelihood of recovering superior recombinant inbred lines. Strong positive correlations between fruit weight and fruit length, fruit width and TSS support indirect selection strategies. The findings underscore the value of wild × cultivated crosses for broadening the genetic base of cultivated watermelon. Overall, this research provides a robust framework for identifying promising breeding populations and implementing targeted selection strategies to improve watermelon yield and quality.

References

  1. 1. Dane F, Liu J. Diversity and origin of cultivated watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:1255–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9107-3
  2. 2. Nishat Z, Quddoos MY, Shahzadi N, Ameer K, Ahmed IAM, Yaqub S, Mukhtar S, Mahmood S, Rafique A, Raza MS, Shahzad A. Probing the physicochemical impact of musk melon seed oil on mayonnaise. Ital J Food Sci. 2024;36:1–9. https://doi.org/10.15586/ijfs.v36i2.2527
  3. 3. Yadav V, Prasad VD, Singh YK. Study on preparation of squash by blending of watermelon and sugar beet pulp and its storage for quality product. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2022;11:185–91.
  4. 4. Zyzelewicz D, Oracz J. Bioavailability and bioactivity of plant antioxidants. Antioxidants. 2022;11:2336. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11122336
  5. 5. Meghwar P, Saeed SMG, Ullah A, Nikolakakis E, Panagopoulou E, Tsoupras A, Smaoui S, Khaneghah AM. Nutritional benefits of bioactive compounds from watermelon: A comprehensive review. Food Biosci. 2024;104609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104609
  6. 6. Soni S, Manjunathagowda DC, Gurjar PKS, Lakshmana Reddy DC. Variability among the populations (F₂:₃ and BC₁F₂) developed for Fusarium wilt and Watermelon Bud Necrosis Virus combined resistance in watermelon. Vegetos. 2024;37:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-024-01100-1
  7. 7. Anonymous, Indiastat Area, production and productivity of watermelon in India and Karnataka [Internet]. 2025-26 [cited 2026 Feb 28]. https://www.indiastat.com
  8. 8. Gusmini G, Wehner TC. Heritability and genetic variance estimate for fruit weight in watermelon. HortScience. 2007;42:1332–36. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.42.6.1332
  9. 9. Choudhary BR, Kumar P, Ram C, Varshney N, Ram H, Yadav LP, Singh D, Rane J. Harnessing genetic variation in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and trait dissection in segregating populations through multivariate approaches. BMC Plant Biol. 2026;26:273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-08023-2
  10. 10. Al-Qadumii LW, Sadder MT, Alkharabsheh B, Salem SY, Salem MS, Bani-Yaseen K. Towards introgression between watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and its wild relative, bitter apple (Citrullus colocynthis). Horticulturae. 2025;11:1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11111304
  11. 11. Bernardo R. Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE. Heredity. 2020;125:375–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0312-1
  12. 12. Anilkumar C, Mohan Rao A, Ramesh S. Breeding potential of crosses derived from parents differing in fruiting habit traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2021;68:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01002-6
  13. 13. Suresh S, Ramesh MSC, Keerthi CM, Ramesh S. Breeding potential of crosses in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet var. lignosus). Environ Ecol. 2017;35:33–38.
  14. 14. Burton GW, Devane EH. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Agron J. 1953;45:478–81. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
  15. 15. Sivasubramanian S, Madhava Menon P. Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agric J. 1973;60:1093–6.
  16. 16. Lush JL. Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Hereditas. 1949;35(S1):356–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb03347.x
  17. 17. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47(7):314–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  18. 18. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989.
  19. 19. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/
  20. 20. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 2004.
  21. 21. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. London: Chapman & Hall; 1998.
  22. 22. Koide Y, Sakaguchi S, Uchiyama T, Ota Y, Tezuka A, Nagano AJ, Ishiguro S, Takamure I, Kishima Y. Genetic properties responsible for the transgressive segregation of days to heading in rice. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2019;9:1655–62. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.201011
  23. 23. Lehermeier C, Teyssedre S, Schön CC. Genetic gain increases by applying the usefulness criterion with improved variance prediction in selection of crosses. Genetics. 2017;207:1651–61. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300403
  24. 24. Allier A, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Teyssedre S, Lehermeier C. Usefulness criterion and post-selection parental contributions in multi-parental crosses: Application to polygenic trait introgression. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2019;9:1469–79. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400129
  25. 25. Ongom PO, Fatokun C, Togola A, Oyebode OG, Ahmad MS, Jockson ID, Bala G, Boukar O. Genetic worth of multiple sets of cowpea breeding lines destined for advanced yield testing. Euphytica. 2021;217:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02763-y
  26. 26. Jamatia J, Choudhary H, Behera TK, Sharma VK. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for horticultural traits and mineral content in watermelon. Veget Sci. 2019;46:88–91. https://doi.org/10.61180/67xnh420
  27. 27. Singh U, Kumar S, Yadav K. Genetic variability and correlation studies in various genotypes of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.]. J Agric Ecol. 2022;13:65–78. https://doi.org/10.53911/JAE.2022.13107
  28. 28. Jagtap BR, Bhuktar AS. Variability study in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Int J Bot Stud. 2021;6:788–91.
  29. 29. Joshna DN, Padma E, Usha Kumari K, Gangadhara Rao P, Paratpara Rao M. Variability studies in F₂ populations of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) for yield and yield attributing traits. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12:766–69.
  30. 30. Lalta P, Choudhary BR, Kumar R, Singh D. Genetic variability and heritability studies in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.). Indian J Hortic. 1998;55:154–58.
  31. 31. Hiremata V, Shet RM, Gunnaiah R, Prashantha A, Hongal S, Naika MB, Ashok, Peerajade DA, Nishani S. Assessment of genetic variability for fruit yield and quality traits in F₂ generation of intraspecific hybrids derived from muskmelon and Mangalore melon. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11:3121–26.
  32. 32. Anburani A, Kannan P, Muthumanickam K. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.). World News Nat Sci. 2019;25:22–30.
  33. 33. Adjoumani K, Koné M, Oulaï A, Bi IAE, Kouakou CK, Kouadio YL. Genetic diversity and trait relationships among watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) accessions. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2021;15:2320–34.
  34. 34. Harshitha GP, Onkarappa T, Manasa N, Ramesh S. Identification of trait-specific and multiple traits-specific soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) germplasm accessions. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2025;59:67–74.
  35. 35. Ranjitha GV, Rao AM, Basanagouda G, Ujjal K, Nateshan HM, Kavya ME, Shilpa M, Prashantha V. Genetics of quantitative traits in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Biol Forum Int J. 2023;15:378–88.
  36. 36. Chauhan SSA, Choudhary H, Yadav RK, Basavaraj YB, Ellur RK, Gupta NC. Genetic study of fruit quality traits in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) prebred line derived from Citrullus lanatus var. citroides. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93:1303–07. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i12.141804
  37. 37. Roy D. Plant breeding: The analysis and exploitation of variability. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; 2000.
  38. 38. Pathy TL, Mohan Rao A, Ramesh S. Assessing breeding potential of three-way cross and double-cross hybrids in chilli (Capsicum annuum). Agric Res. 2018;7:129–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0318-6
  39. 39. Melchinger AE. Expectation of means and variances of testcrosses produced from F₂ and backcross individuals and their selfed progenies. Heredity. 1987;59:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1987.101
  40. 40. Schnell FW. Probleme der Elternwahl – Ein Überblick. Ber Arbeitstagung Arbeitsgemeinschaft Saatzuchtleiter Gumpenstein. 1983.
  41. 41. Bhat AG, Rao AM, Jain JA, Ramesh S, Shivanna B, Nagaraju N. Predicting the crosses for their potential to uncover transgressive recombinant inbred lines (RILs) in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Mysore J Agric Sci. 2024;58:59–66.
  42. 42. Basanagouda G, Ramesh S, Chandana B, Kalpana P, Siddu C, Kirankumar R. Prediction and validation of the frequency of transgressive recombinant inbred lines in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet). Mysore J Agric Sci. 2022;56:75–84.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.