Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

SDG Conference 2024

Vol. 11 No. sp2 (2024): International conference on Multidisciplinary Approaches to SDGs: Life Sciences Perception

Comparative study of the antibacterial activity of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Piper betle L. against Streptococcus mutans, an oral pathogenic bacterium

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3648
Submitted
31 March 2024
Published
16-10-2025

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (Neem) and Piper betle L. (Betel) against Streptococcus mutans, a key oral pathogen associated with dental caries. Fresh and dried leaf and stem samples of both plants were collected, shade-dried, powdered and subjected to solvent extraction using methanol and distilled water. The antibacterial potential was assessed using the agar well diffusion method, with gentamicin serving as the positive control and plain solvents as negative controls. The results demonstrated that all plant extracts exhibited varying degrees of antibacterial activity. Notably, fresh methanol extract of A. indica stem showed the highest zone of inhibition (10.5 mm), followed by the leaf extract of P. betle leaf (8 mm). In general, dried extracts were less effective than fresh ones and methanol proved to be a more efficient solvent than water for extracting bioactive compounds. These findings underscored the potential of these traditionally used medicinal plants as natural alternatives for oral hygiene management and supported the development of plant-based mouthwashes or dental formulations. Further in vivo studies and clinical trials were recommended to validate these in vitro findings and to identify the active constituents responsible for the antibacterial effects.  

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Oral health. [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [cited 2025 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health
  2. 2. Sharda A, Sharda J. Factors influencing choice of oral hygiene products used among the population of Udaipur, India. Int J Dent Clin. 2010;2(2):7–13.
  3. 3. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):5002–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00542-10
  4. 4. Palombo EA. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: Potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:6803
  5. 54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep067
  6. 5. Nagi R, Devi BY, Rakesh N, Reddy SS, Patil DJ. Clinical implications of prescribing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in oral health care- A review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(3):264–71. https://doi.org/
  7. 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.12.002
  8. 6. Vijayakumar S, Yabesh JM, Prabhu S, Manikandan R, Muralidharan B. Quantitative ethnomedicinal study of plants used in the Nelliyampathy hills of Kerala, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;161:238–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.
  9. 2014.12.006
  10. 7. Juhász J, Kertész-Farkas A, Szabó D, Pongor S. Emergence of collective territorial defense in bacterial communities: Horizontal gene transfer can stabilize microbiomes. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095511
  11. 8. Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. Pharm Ther. 2015;40(4):277–83. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4378521/
  12. 9. Metwalli KH. Dental plaque microbiology. In: Hassan AAF, editor. Oral microbiology. InTech; 2013. https://doi.org/
  13. 10.5772/53944
  14. 10. Pandey AK, Das S, Kumar P. Various methods for minimizing post-harvest losses of betelvine leaves (Piper betel L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:1037–43.
  15. 11. Fazal F, Mane PP, Rai MP, Thilakchand KR, Bhat HP, Kamble PS, et al. The phytochemistry, traditional uses and pharmacology of Piper betel Linn. (betel leaf): A pan-Asiatic medicinal plant. Chin J Integr Med. 2014;20(10):777–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1334-1
  16. 12. Bhalerao SA, Prabhu DV. Aluminium toxicity in plants- A review. J Appl Chem. 2013;2(3):447–74.
  17. 13. Dwivedi V, Tripathi S. Review study on potential activity of Piper betle. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2014;3(4):93–98.
  18. 14. Ranjith D, Nisha AR, Nair SN, Litty M, Rahman M, Juliet S. Evaluation of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of herbal formulation used for mastitis in animals. Int J Appl Sci Eng. 2018;6(1):37–48. Available from: https://ndpublisher.in/admin/issues/IJASEV6N1d.pdf
  19. 15. Narwal SS, Tauro P, Bisla SS. Neem in sustainable agriculture. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers; 2003.
  20. 16. Nishan M, Subramanian P. Toxicity activity of Azadirachta indica and Murraya koenigii against Aedes albopictus larvae in laboratory conditions. Mortality. 2014;1(1):1–6.
  21. 17. Pandey BP. Economic botany. New Delhi: S. Chand Publishing; 1999.
  22. 18. Kumar VS, Navaratnam V. Neem (Azadirachta indica): prehistory to contemporary medicinal uses to humankind. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(7):505–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60105-7
  23. 19. Sasidharan N. Illustrated manual on tree flora of Kerala supplemented with computer-aided identification. Peechi: Kerala Forest Research Institute; 2006. p. 698. Available from: https://docs.kfri.res.in/xxxxKFRI-RR/KFRI-RR282.pdf
  24. 20. Keselman HJ, Rogan JC. A comparison of the modified-Tukey and Scheffe methods of multiple comparisons for pairwise contrasts. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73(361):47–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286529
  25. 21. Nalina T, Rahim ZH. The crude aqueous extract of Piper betle L. and its antibacterial effect towards Streptococcus mutans. Am J Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;3(1):10–15. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2007.10.15
  26. 22. Shukla R, Satish V, Singh VK, Kumar S, Gupta S, Gavani U. Antibacterial activity of fresh leaves of Piper betle Linn. Pharma Res. 2009;1:110.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.