Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

The effect of partial replacement of barley by chemically treated crushed date seeds in diets on production, economical performance of sheep

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4405
Submitted
20 July 2024
Published
14-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

The study was conducted in the fields of Barakat Aba Al-Fadl Al-Abbas from the Al-Abbas's (p) Holy Shrine and the current work aimed to study the effect of substituting different levels of chemically treated crushed date seeds instead of barley in the concentrated diet of local male Awassi lambs to know its impact on productive and economic performance. Using a completely randomized design, forty-two male Awassi lambs (average body weights 22.6 ± 0.8 kg) at the age of 4-5 months were used, for the period from 10/8/2022 to 17/10/2022 (63 days). Animals were randomly distributed into seven groups (6 animals/group) in separate cages and experimental treatments were provided. All animals were fed concentrated diets at 3 % of body weight and barley straw was the main source of roughage and was provided as ad libitum. The normal crushed date seeds were replaced by 25.50 % instead of barley and the same proportions for the crushed date seeds were soaked with acetic acid and citric acid in seven treatments. There were significant differences observed in the averages of daily weight gain, feed intake and efficiency of feed conversion. Non-significant differences appeared in the rumen fluid parameters of pH and volatile fatty acids, while the treatments T6 and T7 recorded the lowest significant values in urea nitrogen compared to the highest values in the treatment T1 control. Treatments T6 and T7 were significantly superior in the digestion of nutrients over all treatments. All treatments achieved replacing crushed date seeds by 25 and 50 %, normal and soaked with organic acids, instead of barley, the best economic efficiency compared with the treatment T1 control.

References

  1. Central Statistical Organization - Iraq. Annual Statistical Abstract. Republic of Iraq - Ministry of Planning; 2020-2021.
  2. AL-Dabeeb SN. Effects of feeding low-quality date palm on growth performance and apparent digestion coefficients in fattening Najdi sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 2005;57:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.05.002
  3. Aldhaheri A, Alhadrami G, Aboalnaga N, Wasfi I, Elridi M. Chemical composition of date pits and reproductive hormonal status of rats fed date pits. Food Chemistry. 2004;86:93-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.08.022
  4. Habib HM, Ibrahim WH. Nutritional quality evaluation of eighteen date pit varieties. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2009;60(1):99-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480802314639
  5. Al-Farsi MA, Lee CY. Nutritional and functional properties of dates: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2008;48:877-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390701724264
  6. Almana HA, Mahmoud RM. Palm date seeds as an alternative source of dietary fibre in Saudi bread. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 1994;32:261-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1994.9991406
  7. Hamada JS, Hashim IB, Sharif AF. Preliminary analysis and potential uses of date pits in foods. Food Chemistry. 2002;76:135-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00253-9
  8. Bhat RS, Al-Daihan S. Antibacterial properties of different cultivars of Phoenix dactylifera L. and their corresponding protein content. Annals of Biological Research. 2012;3:4751-57.
  9. Perveen K, Bokhari N, Soliman D. Antibacterial activity of Phoenix dactylifera L. leaf and pit extracts against selected Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2012;6:296-300. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.1380
  10. Yassin NN. Antibacterial activity of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) pit aqueous extract on some bacteria causing urinary tract infection. Diyala Journal for Pure Science. 2012;8:112-20.
  11. Hamad I, Elgawad HA, Al Jaoun S, Zinta G, Asard H, Hassan S, et al. Metabolic analysis of various date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars from Saudi Arabia to assess their nutritional quality. Molecules. 2015;20:13620-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200813620
  12. Saleh EA, Tawfik MS, Abu-Tarboush HM. Phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of various date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruits from Saudi Arabia. Food Science & Nutrition. 2011;2:1134-41. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.210152
  13. Dhama K, Tiwari R, Khan RU, Chakraborty S, et al. Growth promoters and novel feed additives improving poultry production and health, bioactive principles and beneficial applications: The trends and advances - A review. International Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Research. 2014;10(3):129-59. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2014.129.159
  14. Yadav AS, Kolluri G, Gopi M, Karthik K, et al. Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health-promoting agents in poultry - A review. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2016;4(3s):368-83. https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(3S).368.383
  15. Partanen KH, Morz Z. Organic acids for performance enhancement in pig diets. Nutrition Research Reviews. 1999;12:117-45. https://doi.org/10.1079/095442299108728884
  16. Spratt CD. Effect of mould inhibitor-treated high moisture corn on the performance of poultry [MSc thesis]. Guelph: University of Guelph, Canada; 1985.
  17. Frank K. Measures to preserve food and feeds from bacterial damage. Übers Tierernähr. 1994;22:149-63.
  18. Yang X, Xin H, Yang C, Yang X. Impact of essential oils and organic acids on the growth performance, digestive functions and immunity of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition. 2018;4(4):388-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.005
  19. Saeed AA. Effect of level and degradability of dietary protein fed with or without baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on Turkish Awassi lambs performance [PhD dissertation]. Baghdad: College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Iraq; 2011.
  20. Conway EF. Modification analysis and volumetric error. Rev ed. London: Lockwood; 1957.
  21. Warner ACJ. Production of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. Methods of measurements. Nutritional Abstract Review. 1964;34:339-45.
  22. SAS Institute. Statistical Analysis System, User's Guide. Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2012.
  23. Duncan DB. Multiple ranges and multiple "F" tests. Biometrics. 1955;11:1-12.
  24. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2005.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.