Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)

Growth, productivity, quality and profitability of organic finger millet under cultivar and nutrient management options

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4763
Submitted
21 August 2024
Published
24-01-2025 — Updated on 28-01-2025
Versions

Abstract

Cultivars and nutrient management determine productivity and quality of the organic finger millet. A field trial was carried out during the kharif season 2022 at Binjhagiri, Bhubaneswar, Odisha comprising the four cultivars of finger millet and four nutrient management practices through organic manure combinations with split plot design replicated thrice. The four cultivars namely, C1- ‘Arjuna’, C2- ‘Bhairabi’, C3- ‘Chilika’ and C4- ‘Kalua’ were assigned to the main plots. Recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) such as 50 kg ha-1 was supplied through varying percentage of organic manures namely, farmyard manure (FYM), neem oilcake (NOC) and vermicompost (VC). Four nutrient management practices such as N1- FYM (RDN100), N2- FYM (RDN40) + NOC (RDN30) + VC (RDN30), N3- FYM (RDN50) + NOC (RDN25) + VC (RDN25), N4- FYM (RDN60) + NOC (RDN20) + VC (RDN20) were assigned to the sub-plots. Combination of the treatments viz., C3N2, C4N2, C3N3 and C4N3 excelled over the others for grain and protein yields and profitability, but treatment combination C4N2 was the most promising considering the parameters like grain yield (2.10 tha-1), net return (Rs. 36940 ha-1), protein yield (165.75 kg ha-1), calcium yield (7.34 kg ha-1) and iron yield (0.137 kg ha-1). There was significant positive correlation of grain yield with all growth-yield parameters, except test weight, whereas regression analysis indicated 70.86, 85.21 and 73.45% contribution of tillers hill-1, dry matter production and leaf area index at harvest, respectively, to variations in grain yield. The organic finger millet growers should cultivate cv. ‘Kalua’ with application of FYM+NOC+VC @ 4.35+0.34+0.6 t ha-1 for achieving maximum yield and grain quality.

References

  1. Agricultural statistics at a glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2021.
  2. Chethan S, Malleshi NG. Finger millet polyphenols: Optimization of extraction and the effect of pH on their stability. Food Chem. 2007;105(2):862-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.02.012
  3. Devi PB, Vijayabharathi R, Sathyabama S, Malleshi NG, Priyadarisini VB. Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: A review. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51:1021-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0584-9
  4. Puranik S, Kam J, Sahu PP, Yadav R, Srivastava RK, Ojulong H, et al. Harnessing finger millet to combat calcium deficiency in humans: Challenges and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0131
  5. APEDA. E-catalogue for export of millets and value-added products-Odisha, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt of India; 2023. p. 8.
  6. Vel Murugan A, Swarnam TP. Nitrogen release pattern from organic manures applied to an acid soil. J Agric Sci. 2013;5(6):174-84. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n6p174
  7. Abeka H, Lawson IY, Nartey E, Adjadeh T, Asuming-Brempong S, Bindraban P, et al. Effectiveness of neem materials and biochar as nitrification inhibitors in reducing nitrate leaching in a compost-amended Ferric Luvisol. Front Soil Sci. 2022;2:1023743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.1023743
  8. Olle M. Review: Vermicompost, its importance and benefit in agriculture. J Agric Sci. 2019;2:93-98. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.19.19
  9. Bandita S, Tripathy S, Bastia DK, Jena S, Sahoo SK. Effect of establishment methods and organic nutrient management practices on productivity and profitability of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) in lateritic soils of Odisha. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(24):1200-07. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i243126
  10. Tsen CC, Martin EE. A note on determining protein contents in various wheat flours and flour streams by the Kjeldahl and by neutron-activation methods. Cereal Chem. 1971;48:721-26.
  11. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Scientific Publishers; 2019.
  12. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421-28. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  13. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedure for agricultural research. 2nd ed. John New York: Wiley and Sons; 1984.
  14. Singh MK, Kumar V, Prasad S. Evaluation of finger millet varieties under rainfed region of Eastern India: Evaluation of finger millet varieties under rainfed region of South Bihar. J AgriSearch. 2017;4(3):179-83. https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v4i03.9018
  15. Alemayehu B, Zeleke L, Jifara G. Adaptation trial of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) varieties in East Hararghe zone, Ethiopia industry. Int J Agric Life Sci. 2023;9(4):423-27. https://doi.org/10.22573/spg.ijals.023.s122000118
  16. Triveni U, Nagarjuna D, Rani YS, Anuradha N, Patro TS. Performance of improved short duration finger millet genotypes in red sandy loamy soils of North coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh at graded doses of NPK fertilizers. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(4):1130-32. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4i.9756
  17. Das H, Sial P, Dash SR, Dalei BB, Behera TK. Effect of different crop establishment methods and organic sources of nutrients on finger millet in Southeastern Ghat zone of Odisha, India. J Sci Res Reports. 2024;30(5):91-98. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i51925
  18. Pramanick B, Choudhary S, Kumar M, Singh SK, Jha RK, Singh SK, et al. Can site-specific nutrient management improve the productivity and resource use efficiency of climate-resilient finger millet in calcareous soils in India? Heliyon. 2024;10:e32774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32774
  19. Pathma J, Sakthivel N. Microbial diversity of vermicompost bacteria that exhibit useful agricultural traits and waste management potential. SpringerPlus. 2012;1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-26
  20. Dash SR, Mishra PM, Rai AR, Das HD, Rautray BR. A comparative study on yield performance of finger millet varieties under rainfed conditions in Southeastern Ghat zone of Odisha. J Adv Agric Hort Res. 2021;1(1):17-23. https://doi.org/10.55124/jahr.v1i1.63
  21. Sarawale PP, Rajemahadik VA, Shendage GB, Mane SV. Effect of different varieties and establishment methods on growth and yield of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] under Konkan condition. J Indian Soc Coastal Agric Res. 2016;34(2):22-26.
  22. Patil HE, Patel BK, Pali V. Nutritive evaluation of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] genotypes for quality improvement. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7:642-46.
  23. Admassu S, Teamir M, Alemu D. Chemical composition of local and improved finger millet [Eleusine corocana (L.) Gaertn] varieties grown in Ethiopia. Ethiopian J Health Sci. 2009;19(1):1-7.
  24. Shrestha K, Karki DB. Evaluation of nutritional composition of Nepalese finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.). Acta Sci Nutr Health. 2019;3(1):70-74.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.