Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)

Assessing the pollutant removal potential of native reeds in sewage and paper mill effluents

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6019
Submitted
21 October 2024
Published
22-01-2025 — Updated on 25-01-2025
Versions

Abstract

Reed plants are cost effective method of remediating the wastewater. To test the removal efficiency of pollutants from sewage and paper mill effluents, four different reed plant species, Canna indica (Indian Shot), Colocassia esculenta (Taro), Typha domingensis (Southern Cattail) and Xanthosoma sagittifolium (Tannia), were compared for their removal efficiency of pollutants from sewage and paper mill effluents. Because of the high cost and limited effects of present physico-chemical treatments in wastewater treatment plant, this reed bed system can act as a cheaper process, that are essential to remove the organic pollutants, thus make them suitable for agricultural and irrigation purposes. In this study, initially, the raw effluent of sewage and paper mill was characterized. The four reed plants were separately screened with both the effluents by adopting the treatments for the four reeds and seven days retention time as two factors with 2 replications in pots. Each day, the treated effluent was collected from the pot and analysed. Up to day 7, the screening was done with both the effluents. The result shows that the Canna indica and Colocassia esculenta could be the better option for pollutant removal from the sewage and paper mill effluent respectively. The removal efficiency was higher in Canna indica (60%) for sewage wastewater and Colocassia esculenta (65%) for paper mill effluent. This removal percentage shows that the tolerating nature of the plants to the wastewater. The efficiency of the removal of pollutant by reeds can be further improved by bioaugmentation process which aids the action of microbes in the rhizosphere of the reed plants which may be used in the reed bed system.

References

  1. Kaur B, Singh S, Garg BR, Singh JM, Singh J. Enhancing water productivity through on-farm resource conservation technology in Punjab agriculture. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2012;25(1):79-85.
  2. Amarasinghe UA, Shah T, McCornick PG. Seeking calm water: Exploring policy options for India's water future. Nat Resour Forum. 2008;32(4):305-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00203.x
  3. Ranade VV, Bhandari VM. Industrial wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2014.
  4. Thompson G, Swain J, Kay M, Forster CF. The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2001;77(3):275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00060-2
  5. Kumar V, Chopra AK. Fertigation with agro-residue-based paper mill effluent on a high-yield spinach variety. Int J Veg Sci. 2015;21(1):69-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2013.825690
  6. Tanner CC, Sukias JPS. Linking pond and wetland treatment: Performance of domestic and farm systems in New Zealand. Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(2):331-339. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0138
  7. Sayadi MH, Kargar R, Doosti MR, Salehi H. Hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A worldwide review. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci. 2012;2(4):204.
  8. Dueñas JF, Alonso JR, Rey ÀF, Ferrer AS. Characterization of phosphorous forms in wastewater treatment plants. J Hazard Mater. 2003;97(1-3):193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00260-1
  9. CN (EPA) Manual (2004) Guidelines for water reuse, EPA/625/R-04/108. Accessed Sept 2004. [EPA U. Guidelines for water reuse EPA].
  10. Ntengwe FW. The cost benefit and efficiency of wastewater treatment using domestic ponds—the ultimate solution in Southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth. 2005;30(11-16):735-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2005.08.015
  11. Nielsen AH, Lens P, Vollertsen J, Hvitved-Jacobsen T. Sulfide–iron interactions in domestic wastewater from a gravity sewer. Water Res. 2005;39(12):2747-2755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.048
  12. Chen X, Pauly U, Rehfus S, Bester K. Removal of personal care compounds from sewage sludge in reed bed container (lysimeter) studies—effects of macrophytes. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407(21):5743-5749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.023
  13. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi, India: Pentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973. p. 498, 151-154.
  14. Cavusoglu K, Yapar K, Kinalioglu K, Turkmen Z, Cavusoglu K, Yalcin E. Protective role of Ginkgo biloba on petroleu wastewater-induced toxicity in Vicia faba L. (Fabaceae) root tip cells. J Environ Biol. 2010;31(3):319. https://jeb.co.in/journal_issues/201005_may10/paper_16.pdf
  15. Chopra SL, Kanwar JS. Analytical agricultural chemistry. Ludhiana, India: Kalyani Publishers; 1982.
  16. Yasar A, Zaheer A, Tabinda AB, Khan M, Mahfooz Y, Rani S, Siddiqua A. Comparison of reed and water lettuce in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water Environ Res. 2018;90(2):129-135. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X14902968254728
  17. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Five decades of experience. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(1):61-69. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101403q
  18. Selvakumar S, Boomiraj K, Durairaj S, Veluswamy K. Performance evaluation of a lab-scale subsurface flow–constructed wetland system for textile industry wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023 Oct;30(46):102708-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29425-5
  19. Karungamye PN. Potential of Canna indica in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review. Conservation. 2022 Aug 11;2(3):499-513. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation2030034
  20. Wang Q, Hu Y, Xie H, Yang Z. Constructed wetlands: A review on the role of radial oxygen loss in the rhizosphere by macrophytes. Water. 2018;10(6):678. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060678
  21. ur Rehman MZ, Rizwan M, Ali S, Ok YS, Ishaque W, Nawaz MF, Akmal F, Waqar M. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by using Solanum nigrum: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017; xx143:236-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.05.038
  22. Al-Ajalin FA, Idris M, Abdullah SR, Kurniawan SB, Imron MF. Evaluation of short-term pilot reed bed performance for real domestic wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020 Nov 1;20:101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101110
  23. Angmo S, Kharayat Y, Shah S. Efficiency of Canna indica, Phragmites australis and Eichhornia crassipes in Remediation of Leachate Through a Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland. Current World Environment. 2024;19(2):592. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.19.2.7
  24. Marshall NA, Bailey PC. Impact of secondary salinization on freshwater ecosystems: Effects of contrasting, experimental, short-term releases of saline wastewater on macroinvertebrates in a lowland stream. Mar Freshw Res. 2004;55(5):509-523. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF03018
  25. Sochacki A, Yadav AK, Srivastava P, Kumar N, Fitch MW, Mohanty A. Constructed wetlands for metals: Removal mechanism and analytical challenges. In: Bhargava A, editor. Constructed wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2018. p. 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119268376.ch11
  26. Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2005;168(4):541-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420516
  27. Kumari A, Das P, Parida AK, Agarwal PK. Proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics perspectives of salinity tolerance in halophytes. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00537
  28. Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment through plant harvesting—biomass and load matter the most. Ecol Eng. 2020; 155:105962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105962
  29. Al-Ajalin FA, Idris M, Abdullah SR, Kurniawan SB, Imron MF. Evaluation of short-term pilot reed bed performance for real domestic wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020 Nov 1;20:101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101110
  30. Sudarsan JS, Roy RL, Baskar G, Deeptha VT, Nithiyanantham S. Domestic wastewater treatment performance using constructed wetland. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 2015; 1:89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-015-0008-5
  31. Ong SA, Ho LN, Wong YS, Dugil DL, Samad HAF. Semi-batch operated constructed wetlands planted with Phragmites australis for treatment of dyeing wastewater. J Eng Sci Technol. 2011;6(5):623-631.
  32. Sayadi MH, Kargar R, Doosti MR, Salehi H. Hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A worldwide review. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci. 2012;2(4):204.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.