Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Sustainable fodder crop-feed integration practices: Impact on dairy farm economics and agricultural diversity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6067
Submitted
22 October 2024
Published
08-01-2025
Versions

Abstract

The study aimed to identify factors influencing feed purchase among dairy farmers in Tamil Nadu. The study highlights the crucial relationship between fodder crop cultivation and dairy farming economics. Local fodder crops like Hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) play a vital role in supplementing commercial cattle feed, potentially reducing feed costs by 15-20 %. Integrating sustainable fodder cultivation practices with commercial feed usage presents opportunities for improving dairy farm profitability while promoting agricultural diversity. A survey was conducted among 200 dairy farmers in the districts of Ariyalur and Perambalur to gain a deeper understanding of that consumer buying behaviour, cost of production, benefit-cost ratio, factors influence buying behaviour and constraints faced by the farmers while purchasing and using cattle feed, such as the fact that specific feeds are improperly prepared, that costs are prohibitively high and that obtaining credit to pay for feeds is difficult. Key determinants of feed choice include product-related factors, marketing, economic factors, distribution, farm and milk production, labour and Government support. It is concluded that producers, distributors and legislators have insightful information about how to raise feed quality, accessibility and affordability while also boosting the financial viability and sustainability of Tamil Nadus’ dairy industry.

References

  1. Press Information Bureau. Union Minister Shri Parshottam Rupala releases Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics 2023 during the National Milk Day event at Guwahati today [internet]; 2023.[cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://pib.gov.in
  2. National Dairy Development Board. Per capita availability milk by states and UTs [internet]; 2023.[cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://agri.gujarat.gov.in
  3. Government of India, Indian Council of Medical Research. Dietary Guidelines for Indians - A Manual [internet]; 2011.[cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://www.nin.res.in
  4. Government of India, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Rashtriya Gokul Mission [internet]; 2023. [cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://agri.gujarat.gov.in
  5. Roy AK, Agrawal RK et al. Revisiting national forage demand and availability scenario. In: Roy AK, Agrawal RK, Bhardwaj NR, editors. Indian fodder scenario: redefining state-wise status. Jhansi: ICAR- AICRP on forage crops and utilization; 2019. p. 1-21.
  6. Misra AK. Fodder production and utilization strategies for sustainable livestock development in India. Annals of Arid Zone. 2019;58(1)11-2.
  7. Agritech portal. TNAU Expert system for cattle and buffalo-Fodder production [internet]; 2023.[cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://agritech.tnau.ac.in
  8. Ressaissi N, Sanchez-Ballesta MT. Badri M. Influence of drought and heat stresses in fodder legumes productivity and nutritive value. Journal of Oasis Agriculture and Sustainable Development. 2023;5(2):18-26. http://doi.org/10.56027/joasd.092023
  9. Wakchaure R, Ganguly S, Para PA, Praveen PK, Kumar A, Sharma S. Development of crossbred cattle in India: a review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2015;5(10):75-7. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2016.10.006
  10. Pouchepparadjou A, Paradis G, Swaminathan N, Venkatesan S, Umamaheswari L. Adoption of dairy farming practices and productivity status of milch cows in the Union Territory of Puducherry. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences;94(7):642-5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v94i7.150359
  11. Agritech portal, TNAU. Breeds of Cattle Animal Husbandry [internet]; 2023.[cited 2024 18 Sept]. Available from: https://agritech.tnau.ac.in
  12. Cantillon M, Hennessy T, Amon B, Dragoni F, O'Brien D. Mitigation of gaseous emissions from dairy livestock: A farm-level method to examine the financial implications. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;352:119904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119904
  13. John H, Kevin H, Jessica M, Evgenia M. Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices. Land Use Policy. 2018;78:562-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.006
  14. Molla A, Abebe A, Balew M, Assefa D, Kehali S. Analysis of farmers’ perception and constraints on dairy cooperatives in Amhara region, Ethiopia. International Journal on Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2024;5(2):129-39. https://doi.org/10.46676/ij-fanres.v5i2.331
  15. Mandal RK, Kumar S, Ray RK, Kumar A, Kumari S, Bhawar R. Economics of milk production of local cows in Bhagalpur district of Bihar. Economic Affairs. 2024;69(2):873-81. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2024.12
  16. Swarnkar R, Sengar RS, Roy G, Nirala PS, Ogre R. Cost-benefit analysis of Dairy Cooperative members worked under Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited in Raipur district (CG). International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, 2023; 8(5):289-91. https://doi.org/10.22271/veterinary.2023.v8.i5Se.782
  17. Patel J, Kumar S. Climate resilient agriculture practices–The future of farming. Plant Science Today. 2022;9(3):63-70. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1835

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.