Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Effect of enriched humanure on soil properties and yield of Marigold (Tagetes erecta L) in Tropical India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6165
Submitted
19 November 2024
Published
08-03-2025 — Updated on 11-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Utilizing human excrement in agriculture shows great potential for meeting crop nutrient requirements, improving soil health and providing a sustainable solution for managing faecal waste. While a few studies have explored humanure as compost and human urine as a biofertilizer, no research has been conducted on enriched humanure, that is, humanure combined with biochar and urine. Enriched humanure is expected to enhance soil and crop benefits. To evaluate its efficacy, field trials were conducted during the winter and summer seasons in Vridhachalam on marigolds (Hybrid-Bens Tall) using a randomized block design with 11 treatments replicated three times. The treatments included: bioinputs alone, humanure + biochar + human urine at ratios of 1.0:1.0:1.0 and 1.0:1.0:1.5, enriched humanure (1.0:1.0:1.0 and 1.0:1.0:1.5, enriched for 30 days), 50 % enriched humanure + 50 % recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), RDF + farmyard manure (FYM) and FYM alone. The results revealed that enriched humanure (1.0:1.0:1.0) significantly improved the soils’ chemical and biological properties. Its application increased the soils’ available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by 4.2 %, 18.59 % and 8.86 %, respectively. Moreover, the marigold yield reached 27650 kg ha-1, a 42 % improvement compared to the control (FYM application alone).

References

  1. Timsina J. Can organic sources of nutrients increase crop yields to meet global food demand?. Agron. 2018;8(10):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100214
  2. Harder R, Wielemaker R, Larsen TA, Zeeman G, Öberg G. Recycling nutrients contained in human excreta to agriculture: Pathways, processes and products. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2019;49(8):695–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1558889
  3. Berendes DM, Yang PJ, Lai A, Hu D, Brown J. Estimation of global recoverable human and animal faecal biomass. Nat Sustain. 2018;1(11):679–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0167-0
  4. Sherpa AM, Koottatep T, Zurbrügg C, Cissé G. Vulnerability and adaptability of sanitation systems to climate change. J Water Clim Chang. 2014;5(4):487–95. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.003
  5. Cookey PE, Kugedera Z, Alamgir M, Brdjanovic D. Perception management of non-sewered sanitation systems towards scheduled faecal sludge emptying behaviour change intervention. Huma Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00662-0
  6. Nakagiri A, Kulabako RN, Nyenje PM, Tumuhairwe JB, Niwagaba CB, Kansiime F. Performance of pit latrines in urban poor areas: A case of Kampala, Uganda. Habitat Int. 2015;49:529–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.07.005
  7. Prasad CS, Ray I. When the pits fill up: (in) visible flows of waste in urban India J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2019;9(2):338–47. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.153
  8. Koottatep T, Taweesan A, Kanabkaew T, Polprasert C. Inconvenient truth: unsafely managed fecal sludge after achieving MDG for decades in Thailand. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2021;11(6):1062–70. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2021.118
  9. Schouw NL, Danteravanich S, Mosbæk H, Tjell JC. Composition of human excreta: a case study from southern Thailand. Sci Total Environ. 2002;286(1-3):155–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00968-5
  10. Guzha E, Nhapi I, Rockström J. An assessment of the effect of human faeces and urine on maize production and water productivity. Phys Chem Earth A/B/C. 2005;30(11-16):840–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2005.08.005
  11. Kutu FR, Muchaonyerwa P, Mnkeni PNS. Complementary nutrient benefits of combined human excreta compost and inorganic fertilizers on vegetable production in South Africa. Waste Manag Res. 2010;28(11):1039–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x10372093
  12. Panigrahi G. Studies on enrichment of biochar with human urine and Its effect on soil properties and crop growth. M.Sc [Agri]. Bengaluru. University of Agricultural Sciences; 2013. Available from: http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/85334
  13. Kumari, Sonika, Kothari R, Kumar V, Kumar P, Tyagi VV. Kinetic assessment of aerobic composting of flower waste generated from temple in Jammu, India: a lab-scale experimental study. Environ Sustain. 2021;4:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00179-5
  14. Kaur H, Singh J, Singh B. Importance and prospects of Marigold. Just Agric. 2021;2:1–5.
  15. Ramírez WA, Domene XAP, Alcañiz JM. Phytotoxic effects of sewage sludge extracts on the germination of three plant species. Ecotoxicol. 2008;17(8):834–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0246-5
  16. Kavya P. Utilization of biochar from waste materials for the removal of heavy metals. M.Sc [Thesis]. Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2016.
  17. Jackson M. Soil chemical analysis New Delhi, India: Pentice hall of India Pvt. Ltd; 1973.
  18. Bremner JM. Inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen. In: Black CA, editors. Methods of soil analysis. Madison, Wisconsin: Am Soc Agrono; 1965. pp. 1179–1255
  19. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. JBC. 1925;66(2):375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)84756-1
  20. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed, Washington,DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  21. International Organization for Standardization. Microbiology of the food chain, horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella- Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp. ISO [internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Sept 24]; Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/56712.html
  22. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  23. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:258–60.
  24. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  25. Stanford G, English L. Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agron J. 1949;41:446–47. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100090012x
  26. Smith J, Doe A. Determination of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium using DTPA extractant method. J Soil Sci. 2020;58(3):345–56.
  27. Lindsay WL, Norvell W. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421–28. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  28. US Environmental Protection Agency. Test method 3051a: microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils and oils. sw-846: test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods [internet]. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste; 1998 [cited 2024 Sept 24]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-12/documents/3051a.pdf
  29. Casida JrL, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98(6):371–76.
  30. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1969;1(4):301–07. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
  31. Crop Production Guide. Horticulture crops [internet]. Coimbatore: TNAU; 2020 [cited 2024 Sept 24]. Available from: https://agritech.tnau.ac.in
  32. Liu B, Yang B, Zhang C, Wei X, Cao H, Zheng X. Human waste substitute strategies enhanced crop yield, crop quality and soil fertility in vegetable cultivation soils in North China. Agron. 2021;11(11):2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112232
  33. Shenbagavalli S, Mahimairaja S. Production and characterization of biochar from different biological wastes. Int J Plant Anim Environm Sci. 2012;2(1):107–201.
  34. Nagy J, Zseni A. Human urine as an efficient fertilizer product in agriculture. Agron Res. 2017;15(2):490–500.
  35. Castro-Herrera D, Prost K, Schäfer Y, Kim DG, Yimer F, Tadesse M, et al. Nutrient dynamics during composting of human excreta, cattle manure and organic waste affected by biochar. J Environ Qual. 2022;51:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20312
  36. AL-Huqail AA, Kumar P, Abou Fayssal S, Adelodun B, Å iri? I, Goala M, Eid EM. Sustainable use of sewage sludge for marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cultivation: Experimental and predictive modeling studies on heavy metal accumulation. Horticulturae. 2023;9(4):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040447
  37. Allen K, Rodríguez Lo?pez EL, Banwart SA, Evans B. A systematic review of the effects of fecal sludge derived amendments on crop growth and soil health. ACS ES T Engin. 2023;3:746–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00438
  38. Edeh IG, Igwe CA, Ezeaku PI. Effects of rumen digesta on the physico-chemical properties of soil in Nsukka, South Eastern Nigeria. Agro Sci. 2013;12(3):1–8.
  39. Ekpe II, Ihemtuge SC, Okoye C, Ahukaemere CM, Onuora MD, Okere SE, Nwaigwe MO. Effect of hmanure and rumen digesta on soil physic-chemical properties and the yield of cucumber in imo South-eastern, nigeria. Futo J Series. 2017;3:13–26.
  40. Å iri? I, Ebrahem ME, Mostafa AT, Mohamed HEM, Hanan EO, Kumar P, wt al. Combined use of spent mushroom substrate biochar and PGPR improves growth, yield and biochemical response of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis): a preliminary study on greenhouse cultivation. Horticulturae. 2022;8:830. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8090830
  41. Ankush, Prakash R, Singh V, Diwedi A, Popat RC, Kumari S, et al. Sewage sludge impacts on yields, nutrients and heavy metals contents in pearl millet-wheat system grown under saline environment. Int J Plant Product. 2021;15:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-020-00122-4
  42. Yang J, Li L, Li R, Xu L, Shen Y, Li S, et al. Microplastics in an agricultural soil following repeated application of three types of sewage sludge: A field study. Environ Poll. 2021;289:117943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117943
  43. Zahid A, Yike G, Kubik S, Ramzan M, Sardar H, Akram MT, Skalicky M. Plant growth regulators modulate the growth, physiology and flower quality in rose (Rosa hybirda). J King Saud Univ Sci. 2021;33(6):101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101526
  44. Kumar S, Reddy MK, Varma A. Enriched organic amendments improve crop yield and soil health: A review. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2020;20(3):1234–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00123-4
  45. Singh R, Gupta R, Sharma PK. Impact of biochar and enriched compost on soil fertility and productivity of marigold. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42(12):1480–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1612214

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.