Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Morphological, physiological and biochemical trait analysis of maize inbreds under drought conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6203
Submitted
20 November 2024
Published
06-02-2025
Versions

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is a crucial cereal crop that is highly sensitive to drought, which disrupts its morphological, physiological and biochemical traits, impairing photoassimilate allocation. A 2-year field experiment was conducted to assess drought tolerance mechanisms in 6 maize inbred lines—CBM-DL 38, CBM-DL 111, CBM-DL 238, CBM-DL 448, CBM-DL 360 and UMI 1200—by evaluating morphological, physiological, biochemical changes as well as carbohydrate assimilation during sensitive growth stages. Drought stress was applied at different growth stages and observations were recorded 10 days after stress initiation. Drought stress significantly affected growth stages, canopy traits, carbon assimilation and yields. The chlorophyll index decreased by 17–23%, the vegetative index by 33–36% and chlorophyll fluorescence by 47–48%. Meanwhile, the leaf angle increased to 25–30° and the flagging point ratio was reduced to 0.8, resulting in 56–59% yield reduction. However, CBM-DL 38, CBM-DL 111, CBM-DL 448 and CBM-DL 360 demonstrated enhanced drought tolerance, with reduced malondialdehyde (1.5–1.8 times), increased proline (75–93%), improved antioxidant activities [catalase (52–76%), peroxidase (45–57%)] and higher leaf tissue water content (43–59%). Improved leaf architecture enhanced light captures and resource allocation, reducing oxidative damage and maintaining yields. In contrast, CBM-DL 238 and UMI 1200 showed greater reductions in cob weight and 100-grain weight (47–49%). Drought stress during 35–75 days after sowing (DAS) severely impaired photosynthesis, leading to reduced yields. Enhanced canopy traits and biochemical resilience made CBM-DL 38, CBM-DL 111, CBM-DL 448 and CBM-DL 360 more drought-tolerant.

References

  1. Aliniaeifard S, Rezayian M, Mousavi SH. Drought stress: Involvement of plant hormones in perception, signaling and response. Plant Hormones Clim Chng. 2023;227-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4941-8_10
  2. McMillen MS, Mahama AA, Sibiya J, Lubberstedt T, Suza WP. Improving drought tolerance in maize: Tools and techniques. Front Genet. 2023;13:1001001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1001001
  3. Kumar R, Savadatti PM. Comparative analysis of the role of maize farming and agricultural market reforms in raising farmers’ income in India. The J Res ANGRAU. 2023;51(3):147-57. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.17
  4. Kiruthika N, Senthilnathan S, Karthick V, Parimalarangan R, Prahadeeswaran M. Does maize cultivation is profitable in Tamil Nadu-economics of maize cultivation in western zone of Tamil Nadu, India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Soc. 2023;41(12):240-45. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2023/v41i122324
  5. Kim KH, Lee BM. Effects of climate change and drought tolerance on maize growth. Plants. 2023;12(20):3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203548
  6. Li W, Weiss M, Garric B, Champolivier L, Jiang J, Wu W, et al. Mapping crop leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll content using UAV multispectral imagery: Impacts of illuminations and distribution of input variables. Remote Sens. 2023;15(6):1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061539
  7. Sarker U, Oba S. Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of Amaranthus tricolor. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34944-0
  8. Khaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, Maserti BE, Salami SA, Babalar M. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55889-y
  9. Sah RP, Chakraborty M, Prasad K, Pandit M, Tudu VK, Chakravarty MK, et al. Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7
  10. Watson DJ. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv Agron. 1952;4:101-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7
  11. Pepper GE, Pearce RB, Mock JJ. Leaf orientation and yield of maize. Crop Sci. 1977;17(6):883-86. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700060017x
  12. Zhao Y, Fan Z, Hu F, Yin W, Zhao C, Yu A, et al. Source-to-sink translocation of carbon and nitrogen is regulated by fertilization and plant population in maize-pea intercropping. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00891
  13. Minolta C. Manual for chlorophyll meter SPAD-502. Osaka: Minolta Radiometric Instruments Divisions. 1989.
  14. Gonzalo M, Holland JB, Vyn TJ, McIntyre LM. Direct mapping of density response in a population of B73× Mo17 recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Heredity. 2010;104(6):583-99. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.140
  15. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-07. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  16. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15(3):413-28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  17. Karabal E, Yucel M, Oktem HA. Antioxidant responses of tolerant and sensitive barley cultivars to boron toxicity. Plant Sci. 2003;164(6):925-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00067-0
  18. Hugo A, Lester P. Catalase in vitro methods. Enzymology. 1984;105:121-26.
  19. Patra HK, Mishra D. Pyrophosphatase, peroxidase and polyphenoloxidase activities during leaf development and senescence. Plant Physiol. 1979;63(2):318-23. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.63.2.318
  20. Devi MJ, Reddy VR, Timlin D. Drought-induced responses in maize under different vapor pressure deficit conditions. Plants. 2022;11(20):2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202771
  21. Li Y, Song H, Zhou L, Xu Z, Zhou G. Vertical distributions of chlorophyll and nitrogen and their associations with photosynthesis under drought and rewatering regimes in a maize field. Agric For Meteorol. 2019;272:40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.026
  22. Chowdhury MK, Hasan MA, Bahadur MM, Islam MR, Hakim MA, Iqbal MA, et al. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes through phenology, growth and physiological indices. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091792
  23. Yang X, Lu M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Chen S. Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae. 2021;7(3):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030050
  24. Huang C, Ma S, Gao Y, Liu Z, Qin A, Zhao B, et al. Response of summer maize growth and water use to different irrigation regimes. Agronomy. 2022;12(4):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040768
  25. Jahan E, Sharwood RE, Tissue DT. Effects of leaf age during drought and recovery on photosynthesis, mesophyll conductance and leaf anatomy in wheat leaves. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1091418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1091418
  26. Zhu Y, Song B, Guo Y, Wang B, Xu C, Zhu H, et al. QTL analysis reveals conserved and differential genetic regulation of maize lateral angles above the Ear. Plants. 2023;12(3):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030680
  27. Li C, Li Y, Shi Y, Song Y, Zhang D, Buckler ES, et al. Genetic control of the leaf angle and leaf orientation value as revealed by ultra-high-density maps in three connected maize populations. Plos One. 2015;10(3):e0121624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121624
  28. Basu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A. Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000 Res. 2016;5. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7678.1
  29. Khan SU, Zheng Y, Chachar Z, Zhang X, Zhou G, Zong N, et al. Dissection of maize drought tolerance at the flowering stage using genome-wide association studies. Genes. 2022;13(4):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13040564
  30. Gao J, Zhang Y, Xu C, Wang X, Wang P, Huang S. Abscisic acid collaborates with lignin and flavonoid to improve pre-silking drought tolerance by tuning stem elongation and ear development in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant J. 2023;114(2):437-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16147
  31. Zhang J, Tian H, Wang D, Li H, Mouazen AM. A novel spectral index for estimation of relative chlorophyll content of sugar beet. Comp Elect Agric. 2021;184:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106088
  32. Hu F, Zhang Y, Guo J. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics, leaf microstructure and related gene expression of yellow horn. Plant Signal Behav. 2023;18(1):2215025. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2023.2215025
  33. Yu Z, Wang X, Zhang L. Structural and functional dynamics of dehydrins: A plant protector protein under abiotic stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113420
  34. Devate NB, Krishna H, Parmeshwarappa SKV, Manjunath KK, Chauhan D, Singh S, et al. Genome-wide association mapping for component traits of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:943033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.943033
  35. Yan S, Weng B, Jing L, Bi W. Effects of drought stress on water content and biomass distribution in summer maize (Zea mays L.). Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1118131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1118131
  36. Raju SK, Adkins M, Enersen A, Carvalho DS, Studer AJ, Ganapathysubramanian B, et al. Leaf Angle eXtractor: A high-throughput image processing framework for leaf angle measurements in maize and sorghum. Appl Plant Sci. 2020;8(8):e11385. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11385
  37. Kumdee O, Molla MSH, Kanavittaya K, Romkaew J, Sarobol E, Nakasathien S. Morpho-physiological and biochemical responses of maize hybrids under recurrent water stress at early vegetative stage. Agriculture. 2023;13(9):1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091795
  38. Guzzo MC, Costamagna C, Salloum MS, Rotundo JL, Monteoliva MI, Luna CM. Morpho-physiological traits associated with drought responses in soybean. Crop Sci. 2021;61(1):672-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20314
  39. Mockeviciute R, Jurkoniene S, Sveikauskas V, Zareyan M, Jankovska-Bortkevic E, Jankauskiene J, et al. Probiotics, proline and calcium induced protective responses of Triticum aestivum under drought stress. Plants. 2023;12(6):1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061301
  40. Kiran S, Kusvuran S, Ozkay F, Elliatioglu SS. Change in physiological and biochemical parameters under drought stress in salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible eggplant genotypes. Turk J Agric For. 2019;43(6):593-602. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1808-1
  41. Dvojkovic K, Plavsin I, Novoselovic D, Simic G, Lalic A, Cupic T, et al. Early antioxidative response to desiccant-stimulated drought stress in field-grown traditional wheat varieties. Plants. 2023;12(2):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020249
  42. Hussain HA, Men S, Hussain S, Chen Y, Ali S, Zhang S, et al. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3890. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40362-7
  43. Kesawat MS, Satheesh N, Kherawat BS, Kumar A, Kim HU, Chung SM, et al. Regulation of reactive oxygen species during salt stress in plants and their crosstalk with other signaling molecules-Current perspectives and future directions. Plants. 2023;12(4):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040864
  44. Sun S, Yao X, Liu X, Qiao Z, Liu Y, Li X, et al. Brassinolide can improve drought tolerance of maize seedlings under drought stress: By inducing the photosynthetic performance, antioxidant capacity and ZmMYB gene expression of maize seedlings. J Soil Sci Plant Nutri. 2022;22(2):2092-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00796-x
  45. Faizan M, Hayat S, Ahmed SM. Reactive oxygen species: Prospects in plant metabolism. Springer Nature. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9794-5
  46. Guo R, Qian R, Du L, Sun W, Wang J, Cai T, et al. Straw-derived biochar optimizes water consumption, shoot and root characteristics to improve water productivity of maize under reduced nitrogen. Agric Water Manag. 2024;294:108722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108722
  47. Mannan MA, Shashi MA. Amelioration of drought tolerance in maize using rice husk biochar. In: Maize-Production and Use. IntechOpen; 2019.1-19.
  48. Szabo A, Mousavi SMN, Bojtor C, Ragan P, Nagy J, Vad A, et al. Analysis of nutrient-specific response of maize hybrids in relation to leaf area index (LAI) and remote sensing. Plants. 2022;11(9):1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091197
  49. Sabiel SA, Abdelmula AA, Bashir EM, Baloch SU, Baloch SK, Bashir W. Genetic variation of flowering trait in maize (Zea mays L.) under drought stress at vegetative and reproductive stages. J Biol Agric Healthcare. 2014;4(20):108-13.
  50. He L, Sun W, Chen X, Han L, Li J, Ma Y, et al. Modeling maize canopy morphology in response to increased plant density. Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:533514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.533514

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.