Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Assessing the superiority of Casuarina equisetifolia L. and Casuarina junghuhniana clones for dendroenergy under semi-arid condition

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6227
Submitted
21 November 2024
Published
04-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study assessed genetic variation and heritability in 13 clones of casuarina species for growth attributes. The experiment, conducted in Coimbatore, India, used a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. Biometric parameters, including plant height, collar diameter, sturdiness quotient and volume index, were measured 2, 4 and 6 months after planting (MAP). We observed significant variations among the clones for all traits. Clone E9B consistently outperformed others across growth stages, particularly in plant height, collar diameter and volume index. Conversely, clones CE04 and CE 06 generally underperformed. Genetic variability analysis revealed a high PCV and GCV for the volume index, indicating good potential for selection and improvement. Plant height exhibited exceptionally high heritability (99.4 %), suggesting minimal environmental influence. Association studies showed strong positive correlations between plant height, basal diameter and volume index at phenotypic and genotypic levels. Path analysis identified basal diameter as having the highest direct positive effect on volume index. Diversity analysis clustered the clones into three groups, with plant height contributing 58.97 % to genetic divergence. These findings highlight substantial genetic variability among the studied casuarina clones for key growth traits. The superior performance of E9B across multiple attributes suggests its potential value for breeding programs or direct use in plantations. High heritability of plant height and strong correlation between growth traits indicate promising prospects for genetic improvement through selection. This research provides valuable insights for casuarina breeding and selection programs to develop improved varieties for agroforestry and plantation forestry applications.

References

  1. Potgieter LJ, Richardson DM, Wilson JR. Casuarina: biogeography and ecology of an important tree genus in a changing world. Biol Invas. 2014;16:609–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0613-x
  2. Turnbull JW. Australian vegetation. Aciar Monograph Series. 1997;24:19–38.
  3. Zobel B, Talbert J. Applied forest tree improvement. New York: John Wiley; 1984
  4. Jansson G, Hansen JK, Haapanen M, Kvaalen H, Steffenrem A. The genetic and economic gains from forest tree breeding programmes in Scandinavia and Finland. Scand J For Res. 2017;32(4):273–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1242770
  5. Liu X, Zhao Q, Yin P, Li H, Li X, Wu L, et al. Variation and stability analysis of growth traits of poplar clones in the seedling stage in northeast China. J For Res. 2023;34(4):1107–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01529-7
  6. Kulkarni HD. Industrial agroforestry: An ITC initiative. Indian Farming. 2014;63.
  7. Gumgumjee NM, Hajar AS. Antimicrobial efficacy of Casuarina equisetifolia extracts against some pathogenic microorganisms. J Med Plants Res. 2012 10;6(47):5819–25. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR12.741
  8. Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. Forestry Chron. 1960;36(1):10–13. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc36010-1
  9. Cruz CD. Genes: a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Scientia Agron. 2013;35:271–76. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251
  10. Hussnain M, Maheswarappa V, Hegde R, Ganapati JM. Evaluation of early growth and morphological variation in Casuarina hybrid clones. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;950–58. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.117
  11. Luechanimitchit P, Luangviriyasaeng V, Laosakul S, Pinyopusarerk K, Bush D. Genetic parameter estimates for growth, stem-form and branching traits of Casuarina junghuhniana clones grown in Thailand. Forest Ecol Manage. 2017;15;404:251–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.030
  12. Zhang Y, Zhong C, Chen Y, Chen Z, Jiang Q. Evaluation and selection of superior Casuarina clones in Hainan. J Nanjing For Uni. 2011 30;54(05):25.
  13. Bassi P, Garg RK, Choudhary OP, Kaur N. Effect of salinity stress on growth related physiological and biochemical traits of Casuarina clones in nursery. Ind J Agrofor. 2020;22(1):90–96.
  14. Luna RK, Thakur NS, Kumar V. Growth performance of twelve new clones of poplar in Punjab, India. Ind J Ecol. 2011;38:107–09.
  15. Ramesh KR, Deshmukh HK, Sivakumar K, Guleria V, Umedsinh RD, Krishnakumar N, et al. Influence of eucalyptus agroforestry on crop yields, soil properties and system economics in Southern Regions of India. Sustain. 2023;15(4):3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043797
  16. El-Juhany LI, Aref IM, El-Wakeel AO. Evaluation of above-ground biomass and stem volume of three Casuarina species grown in the central region of Saudi Arabia. Emirates J Agric Sci. 2002;14:8–13. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v14i1.4980
  17. Vishnu R, Anoop EV, Warrier KC, Anish MC. Genetic divergence for growth and wood parameters in different clones of Casuarina equisetifolia. J Trop Forest Sci. 2018;30(4):615–21. https://doi.org/10.26525/jtfs2018.30.4.615621
  18. Zhang M, Sharma A, León F, Avery B, Kjelgren R, McCurdy CR, Pearson BJ. Effects of nutrient fertility on growth and alkaloidal content in Mitragyna speciosa (Kratom). Fron Pl Sci. 2020;11:597696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.597696
  19. Tomar A, Singh BK. Biomass, productivity, carbon sequestration and economics of four short rotation tree species in Eastern part of Uttar Pradesh. Research Square; 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3152266/v1
  20. Nicodemus A, Pinyopusarerk C, Zhong C, Franche F. Casuarina Improvement for securing rural livelihoods. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Casuarina Workshop Chennai; Mamallapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu; Dehradun: ICRFRE 2014; 2014 3-7 Feb. Available from: https://icfre.gov.in
  21. Avinash Jain AJ, Pranav Dhar PD. Evaluation of provenances for seedling growth and biomass attributes in Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Ind Forester. 2008;907–15.
  22. Carneiro JG, Barroso DG, Soares LM. Growth of bare root Pinus taeda, L. seedlings cultivated under five densities in nursery. Sci Agric. 2007;64:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000100004
  23. Banach J, Kormanek M, Malek S, Durlo G, Skrzyszewska K. Effect of the changing seedlings density of Quercus robur L. grown in nursery containers on their morphological traits and planting suitability. Sylwan. 2023;167(01):1-12. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylvan.2022082
  24. Panda MR, Pradhan D, Dey AN. Effect of different growing media on the performance of teak (Tectona grandis Linn.) stump in nursery. Ind J Ecol. 2021;48(4):1051–55.
  25. Guo XY, Zhang XS. Performance of 14 hybrid poplar clones grown in Beijing, China. Bio Bioener. 2010;34(6):906–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.036
  26. Geethanjali S, Dhandapani M, Sivakumar V. Genetic diversity and variability in Barnyard millet [Echinochloa frumentaceae (L.)] germplasm based on morphological traits. Mad Agric J. 2023;110:1. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.000723
  27. Singh O. Genetic improvement and conservation of bamboos in India. Resources–Forestry, Plantations and Conservation. 2009;4:15.
  28. Sundararaju R, Bharathi RK, Chinnathurai AK. Provenance trial of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Ind For. 1995;96–102.
  29. Warrier KC, Vamadevan T. Genetic variability in international provenances of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Elect J Pl Breed. 2023;14(4):1405–11. https://doi.org/10.37992/2023.1404.171
  30. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybeans and their implications in selection. Agron J. 1955;477?83. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700100008x
  31. Baghyalakshmi K, Manickam S, Amutha M, Sampathkumaa A, Yamuna MG, Prakash AH. Site regression and multivariate analysis for genetic diversity in Gossypium barbadense accessions. Elect J Pl Breed. 2023;14(3):775–86. https://doi.org/10.37992/2023.1403.088
  32. Burton GW. Quantitative inheritance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Agron J. 1951;409–17. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090001x
  33. Otegbeye GO, Samarawira I. Correlations of growth and form characteristics of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. provenances in northern Nigeria. Forest Ecol Manage. 1992;50(3–4):275–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90342-7
  34. Reddy MM, Subramanian S. Correlation and path coefficient studies in sandal (Santalum album L.). Ann Forest. 1998;6(1):39–43.
  35. Singh KB, Singh S. Genetic variability and interrelationship studies on yield and other quantitative characters in lentil, Lens culinaris. Medic. 1969;737–41.
  36. Pandey DP, Pandey VP, Tripathi ST, Tewari SK. Path analysis in Populus deltoides Bart: 8 year age. Ind Forest. 1997;755–58.
  37. Doran K, Ruess RW, Plumley GF, Wurtz TL. Photosynthetic responses of white spruce saplings (Picea glauca) to controlled density gradients of spruce and green alder (Alnus crispa). Ecosci. 2001;8(1):76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2001.11682633
  38. Dhillon RS, Singh VP, Dhanda SK. Correlation and path coefficient studies on some seedling traits in shisham (Dalbergia sissoo Roxb.). Ind J Forest. 2000;67–69.
  39. Siddiqui AA, Srivastav PK, Beck SB, Thangavelu K. Evaluation of Terminalia genotypes-genetic and phenotypic correlation and path analysis. Ann Forest. 1994;127–33.
  40. Santos CA, Nascimento SCD. Association between quantitative characters of Spondias tuberosa A. Camara. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 1998;449–56.
  41. Kumar AK, Paramathama M. Correlation and path coefficient studies in Casuarina equisetifolia L. Johnson. Ind For. 2005;47–55.
  42. Kant AK, Dutt VD, Sharma DR. Genetic variability in phenotypic characters of Pinus gerardiana. Ind For. 2006;681–90.
  43. Garg RK, Sra MS, Nicodemus A, Singh A, Singh G. Evaluation of interspecific hybrid clones of Casuarina for adaptability and growth in arid and semi-arid regions of North-West India. J Environ Biol. 2022;43(2):317–25. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/43/2/MRN-1955
  44. Varghese TM. Biometrical techniques in genetics and breeding. Hissar: Inter Biosci Publishers; 1976
  45. Gupta S, Sahoo GR, Wani AM. Estimation of genetic parameters in progenies of Acacia nilotica (L.). Int J Curr Microbio App Sci. 2020:337–42.
  46. Jindal SK, Singh M, Solanki KR, Kackar NL. Changes in genetic parameters and ranks of tree height over six growth years in Tecomella undulata (Sm.) Seem. Silvae Genet. 1992;41:213–16.
  47. Apurva K, Singh H, Kumar H. Elucidating morphological and growth changes in Arjun tree (Terminalia arjuna) grown under elevated temperature condition. Trends Biosci. 2017;10(1):332–36.
  48. Jamaludheen V, Gopikumar K, Sudhakara K. Variability studies in Lagerstroemia (Lagerstroemia speciosa Pers.). Ind For. 1995;121(2):137–42.
  49. Rawat RS, Nautiyal S. Genotype-site interactions in growth, physiological and biochemical parameters in clones of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Silvae Genetica. 2007;56(1–6):201–06. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2007-0030
  50. Lai M, Dong L, Yi M, Sun S, Zhang Y, Fu L, et al. Genetic variation, heritability and genotype × environment interactions of resin yield, growth traits and morphologic traits for Pinus elliottii at three progeny trials. Forests. 2017;8(11):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110409
  51. Sangram C, Keerthika A. Genetic variability and association studies among morphological traits of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. genetic resources. Res J Agric Forest Sci. 2013;2320:6063.
  52. Wani TA, Kitchlu S, Ram G. Genetic variability studies for morphological and qualitative attributes among Jatropha curcas L. accessions grown under subtropical conditions of North India. S Afr J Bot. 2012;79:102–05. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2011.10.009
  53. Singh O, Bordoloi S, Mahanta N. Variability in cone, seed and seedling characteristics of Pinus kesiya Royle ex. Gordon. J Forest Res. 2015;26:331–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0036-x
  54. Ramesh KR, Khurana DK. Clonal provenance variation of Populus alba Linn. in nursery. Ind J Forest. 2008;31(4):599–610. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2008-A1KCP9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.