Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Weed biology and crop-weed competition dynamics in direct- seeded rice ecosystems

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6684
Submitted
13 December 2024
Published
24-07-2025 — Updated on 31-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of weed competition on the growth and yield of direct-seeded rice (DSR) under puddled and unpuddled conditions at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai, Thanjavur, during the Kharif seasons of 2019 and 2020. The experimental site, characterized by a sub-tropical climate and alluvial clay soil, demonstrated significant differences in weed emergence, with earlier sprouting observed in unpuddled conditions. Weed biology, particularly the germination patterns and growth rates of various weed species, was crucial in shaping weed competition dynamics. In unpuddled conditions, certain weeds, especially annual grasses, exhibited rapid seedling establishment, benefiting from the more open, less waterlogged soil conditions. Weed density assessments indicated higher competition levels in weedy plots, particularly 30 days after sowing, with grasses dominating the weed population. This was due to the higher viability and faster germination rates of these species under unpuddled conditions. Weed biology also revealed that weed species with deep root systems were better able to access nutrients and water deeper in the soil, which further intensified competition with the rice crop, particularly in unpuddled plots. In contrast, puddled conditions inhibited the growth of certain weed species by restricting oxygen access to their roots and promoting anaerobic soil conditions, which helped reduce the weed biomass and competition. Plant growth attributes, including height and tiller counts, were significantly greater in puddled DSR plots, resulting in higher yields than unpuddled plots. Notably, yield losses due to weed competition were most pronounced between 30 and 45 days after sowing, a critical growth phase when rice plants are most vulnerable to weed pressure. This period coincided with peak weed germination and establishment, which led to severe competition for light, nutrients and water. These results underscore the importance of understanding weed biology in the context of weed management strategies. Effective control measures, tailored to the biology of the dominant weed species in each system, are essential to maximizing DSR productivity. Furthermore, the advantages of puddled cultivation, which limit weed growth and improve rice yield, highlight its importance as a key practice in sustainable rice farming.

References

  1. 1. Yogita Gharde PK, Singh RP, Dubey, Gupta PK. Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India. Crop Prot. 2018;107(1):12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.01.007
  2. 2. Sheeja KR, Elizabeth KS. Weed management in direct-seeded rice: A review. Agri Rev. 2017;38(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag. v0iOF.7307
  3. 3. Vijay S, Jat ML, Ganie ZA, Chauhan BS, Gupta RK. Herbicide options for effective weed management in dry direct-seeded rice under scented rice-wheat rotation of western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Crop Prot. 2016;81(1):168–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.021
  4. 4. Neve P, Barney JN, Buckley Y, Cousens RD, Graham S, Jordan NR, et al. Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: A horizon scan. Weed Res. 2016;250–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12304
  5. 5. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1984.
  6. 6. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Ecological studies on Echinochloa crus-galli and the implications for weed management in direct-seeded rice. Crop Prot. 2011;30(1):1385–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.013
  7. 7. Nichols V, Verhulst N, Cox R, Govaerts B. Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review. Field crops res. 2015;183(1):56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.012
  8. 8. Saravanane P, Mala S, Chellamuthu V. Integrated weed management in aerobic rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(2):
  9. 152–54. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00038.1
  10. 9. Karthika R, Subramanian E, Ragavan T. Effect of weed management practices on crop growth, yield and economics of direct seeded rice ecosystems. Madras Agri J. 2019;106:184–89. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.2019.000244
  11. 10. Chauhan BS, Awan TH, Abugho SB, Evengelista G. Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management and rice yield. Field Crops Res. 2015;172(1):72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.
  12. 2014.12.011
  13. 11. Kolo E, Adigun AJ, Adeyemi RO, Daramola SO, Bodunde JG. The effect of weed control timing on the growth and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa l.). J Agri Sci (Belgrade). 2021;66(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2101027E
  14. 12. Mahajan G, Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Weed management in aerobic rice in the Northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains. J Crop Improv. 2009;23(4):366–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427520902970458
  15. 13. Norsworthy JK, Ward SM, Shaw DR, Llewellyn RS, Nichols RL, Webster TM, et al. Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: Best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 2012;60(SP1):31–62. https://doi.org/10.
  16. 1614/WS-D-11-00155.1
  17. 14. Mishra JS, Kumar R, Kumar R, Rao KK, Bhatt BP. Weed density and species composition in rice-based cropping systems as affected by tillage and crop rotation. Indian J Weed Sci. 2019;51(2):116–22. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-
  18. 8164.2019.00027.3
  19. 15. Choudhary AK, Yadav DS, Sood P, Rahi S, Arya K, Thakur SK, et al. Post-emergence herbicides for effective weed management, enhanced wheat productivity, profitability and quality in north-western Himalayas: A ‘participatory-mode’ technology development and dissemination. sustainability. 2021;13(10):425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13
  20. 105425
  21. 16. Asenso E, Wang Z, Kai T, Li J, Hu L. Effects of puddling types and rice establishment methods on soil characteristics and productivity of rice in Southern China. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2022;2022(1):3192003. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3192003
  22. 17. Kumar V, Obour A, Jha P, Liu R, Manuchehri MR, Dille JA, et al. Integrating cover crops for weed management in the semiarid U.S. Great Plains: Opportunities and challenges. Weed Sci. 2020;68(1):311–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2020.29
  23. 18. Cuong DM, Ham LH, Trung KH. Integration of allelopathy to control weeds in rice. In Price AJ, Kelton JA, editors. Herbicides-current research and case studies in use. Rijeka: InTech; 2013;75–99. https://doi.org/10.5772/56035
  24. 19. Choudhary VK, Dixit A. Herbicide weed management effect on weed dynamics, crop growth and yield in direct-seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2018;50(1):6–12. https:// doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2018.00002.3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.