Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)

Assessment of polyclonal derivatives for morphological traits and hybridity analysis using SSR markers in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6854
Submitted
22 December 2024
Published
27-01-2025 — Updated on 04-02-2025
Versions

Abstract

Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is increasingly cultivated as an intercrop in South India, necessitating the development of high-yielding, region-specific varieties. As a self-incompatible crop, establishing polyclonal orchards with cross-compatible varieties and producing full-sib hybrids through controlled pollination is vital for genetic improvement. Evaluation of half-sib and full-sib progenies was undertaken in polyclonal cocoa gardens situated at Coconut Research Station, Aliyar Nagar and Horticulture Research Station, Thadiyankudisai, under the auspices of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Pods developed from the natural cross and cross-made using caging techniques were evaluated, and seeds were sown to assess the performance of the hybrids. The findings illustrated the highest germination percentage in the half-sib cross CCRP 5 × X (89.66 %), followed by CCRP 4 × X (85.57 %). The highest value for plant morphological characters like plant height (2.11 m), stem girth (15.7 cm) and jorquette height (1.58 m) was recorded in CCRP 5 × X. Among the full-sib progenies, the highest germination percentage (86.1) was recorded by FS 17 (CCRP 3 × CCRP 5), followed by FS 18 (CCRP 5 × CCRP 3) (81.8). The hybridity of the seedlings was tested using SSR markers, which confirmed that out of 26 full-sib crosses, 16 exhibited a heterozygous nature. These findings demonstrate the potential of selected progenies to serve as valuable genetic resources for breeding programs aimed at enhancing cocoa productivity and sustainability in South India.

References

  1. Bailey BA, Strem MD, Bae H, De Mayolo GA, Guiltinan MJ. Gene expression in leaves of Theobroma cacao in response to mechanical wounding, ethylene and/or methyl jasmonate. Plant Sci. 2005;168(5):1247–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.01.002
  2. Motamayor JC, Risterucci A-M, Lopez PA, Ortiz CF, Moreno A, Lanaud C. Cacao domestication I: the origin of the cacao cultivated by the Mayas. Heredity. 2002;89(5):380–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800156
  3. Ratnam R. Introduction of Criollo cacao into Madras state. S Ind Hortic. 1961;9(4):24–29.
  4. Cheesman E. Notes on the nomenclature, classification and possible relationships of cacao populations. Trop Agri. 1944;21:144–59.
  5. Simmons J. Cocoa production, economic and botanical perspectives. New York: Praeger Publishers; 1976.
  6. Prasannakumari Amma S, Nair R, Lalithabai E, Malika V, Minimol J. Koshy Abraham. Cocoa in India. Kerala: Kerala Agricultural University; 2009.
  7. Bartley B, Cope F. Practical aspects of self-incompatibility in Theobroma cacao L. Agric Genet Sel Top R Moav; 1973.
  8. Wood G, Lass R. Cocoa tropical agriculture. London: Longman; 1985.
  9. Sharma D, Singh R. Self-incompatibility in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Hortic Res. 1970; 10:108–18.
  10. Yamada MM, Guries RP. Mating system analysis in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). Agrotrópica. 1988;10(3):165–76.
  11. Walters T, Posluszny U, Kevan P. Isozyme analysis of the grape (Vitis). I. A practical solution. Can J Bot. 1989;67(10):2894–99. https://doi.org/10.1139/b89-371
  12. Kuhn DN, Motamayor JC, Meerow AW, Borrone JW, Schnell RJ. SSCP markers provide a useful alternative to microsatellites in genotyping and estimating genetic diversity in populations and germplasm collections of plant-speciality crops. Electrophoresis. 2008;29(19):4096–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200700937
  13. Livingstone DS, Motamayor JC, Schnell RJ, Cariaga K, Freeman B, Meerow AW, et al. Development of single nucleotide polymorphism markers in Theobroma cacao and comparison to simple sequence repeat markers for genotyping of Cameroon clones. Mol Breed. 2011;27:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9416-2
  14. Mensah-Brako B. Effect of watering regime and cocoa pod husk on soil fertility and growth of hybrid cocoa seedlings in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana. MSc [Thesis]. Kumasi: Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology; 2011. Available from: https://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/3987
  15. Saunders JA, Mischke S, Leamy EA, Hemeida AA. Selection of international molecular standards for DNA fingerprinting of Theobroma cacao. Theo App Gene. 2004;110:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1762-1
  16. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1954.
  17. Cope F. Incompatibility in Theobroma cacao. Nature. 1958;181(4604):279. https://doi.org/10.1038/181279a0
  18. Apshara ES. Performance of selected cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) clones under arecanut and coconut. J Plant Crops. 2013;41(2):24246.
  19. Takrama J, Cervantes-Martinez C, Phillips-Mora W, Brown J, Motamayor J, Schnell R. Determination of off-types in a cocoa breeding programme using microsatellites. Ingenic Newslett. 2005;10:2–8.
  20. Asolkar T, Desai AR, Singh NP. Molecular analysis of cashew genotypes and their half-sib progeny using RAPD marker. Biotechnol Bioinf Bioeng. 2011;1:495–504.
  21. Montserin B, Verteuil Ld. Hybridization work of the Department of Agriculture (Trinidad and Tobago) for the control of witches' broom disease of cacao. Trinidad and Tobago: Extension Training and Information Services Division Ministry of Food Production;1956.
  22. Paulin D, Mossu G, Lachenaud P, Cilas C. Cocoa breeding in Côte-d'Ivoire. Performance analysis of sixty-two hybrids in four localities. Café, Cacao, Thé. 1993;37(1):3–20.
  23. Pires J, Monteiro W, Pinto L, Figueira A, Yamada M, Ahnert D, editors. A proposal for cocoa breeding. In: 12th International Cocoa Research Conference, Lagos, Nigéria, Cocoa Producers' Alliance; 1996, p. 287–92.
  24. Becher S, Steinmetz K, Weising K, Boury S, Peltier D, Renou JP, et al. Microsatellites for cultivar identification in Pelargonium. Theoret App Gene. 2000;101:643–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051526
  25. Esselink G, Smulders M, Vosman B. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theoret App Gene. 2003;106:277–86.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1122-y

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.