Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Geographical indications: Global trends and Indias' progress in agricultural and handicraft products

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7178
Submitted
11 January 2025
Published
18-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

Geographical Indications (GIs) provide legal protection to products tied to specific regions, highlighting their unique qualities and heritage. The significance of GIs has grown globally, as they serve as tools to protect traditional products, promote regional economic development and ensure product quality in the market. This paper examines the role of GIs globally and in India, emphasizing their importance in promoting sustainable production practices and protecting intellectual property rights. The study utilizes secondary data from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Intellectual Property India database, examining trends in GI registration across various product categories and states. China ranks first in the total GI share with 9785 GIs and India ranks 52nd with 530 GIs Globally in 2023. In India, Uttar Pradesh ranks first with 74 GIs and Tamil Nadu Ranks second with 59 GIs in 2024. The findings revealed that agricultural commodities and handicrafts products dominate the GI landscape in India, while globally, wines and spirits form the largest share of GIs. Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for Global (8.17 %) and Indian GIs (5.76 %) showed a positive growth rate for the period under study. CAGR analysis indicated the highest growth in the registration of GIs under agricultural commodities in India (10.63 %) and globally (12.14 %). The paper concludes that while India has made significant progress, further research and policy frameworks are needed to address challenges in promoting GIs and the support needed post-GI registration. Globally, GIs offer potential for economic growth, cultural preservation and sustainability.

References

  1. Barbosa DB. Intellectual property in Brazil: A brief synopsis [internet]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; 2012 [cited 2024 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.daniel-ip.com/
  2. Shaver L. Access to knowledge in Brazil: new research on intellectual property, innovation and development. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2010. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849665568.ch-001
  3. IPindia. GI Registry, India. List of registered geographical indications in India [internet]. 2024 [cited 2024Sep 20]. Available from: https://ipindia.gov.in/registered-gls.html
  4. Dias C, Mendes L. Protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI) and traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG): A bibiliometric analysis. Food Res Int. 2018;103:492–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.059
  5. Osei C. Nation branding for FDI attraction: The case of Ghana. London: Routledge; 2016.
  6. Rupprecht T. Global varieties of neoliberalism: Ideas on free markets and strong states in late twentieth-century Chile and Russia. Global Persp. 2020;1(1):13278. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.13278
  7. Rangnekar D. The socio-economics of geographical indications. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper. 2004;8:13–15. https://doi.org/10.7215/IP_IP_20040501B
  8. World Intellectual Property Indicators, World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) [internet].Geneva, Switzerland WIPO; 2023. [cited 2024 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4678&plang=EN ;
  9. Beresford, A. The role of geographical indications in international trade. J World Trade. 2017;51(4):497–518.
  10. Török Á, Jantyik L, Maró ZM, Moir HV. Understanding the real-world impact of geographical indications: A critical review of the empirical economic literature. Sustainability. 2020;12(22):9434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229434
  11. De Filippis F, Giua M, Salvatici L, Vaquero-Piñeiro C. The international trade impacts of geographical indications: Hype or hope?. Food Pol. 2022;112:102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102371
  12. Bournival M. Geographical Indications: Legal framework and economic implications. J Intl Trade Eco Dev. 2020;29(4):413–31.
  13. Hoang G, Le HT, Nguyen AH, Dao QM. The impact of geographical indications on sustainable rural development: A case study of the Vietnamese Cao Phong orange. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114711
  14. Ihsaniyati H, Setyowati N. Factors motivating the adoption of geographical indication-based quality standards among robusta coffee farmers in Indonesia. Intl J Bus Soc. 2022;23(1):207–25. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4609.2022
  15. Laksono P, Mulyo JH, Suryantini A. Farmers' willingness to adopt geographical indication practice in Indonesia: A psycho behavioral analysis. Heliyon. 2022;8(8):e10178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10178
  16. López?Bayón S, Fernández?Barcala M, González?Díaz M. In search of agri?food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?. Agribusiness. 2020;36(4):568–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21665
  17. Bhat R. Geographical indications in Asia: trends and challenges. As Eco PolRev. 2010;15(2):213–26.
  18. Ashwathi TM. Geographical indications in India: major issues and challenges. LLM [dissertation]. Kochi: National University of Advanced Legal studies; 2020. Available from: https://14.139.185.167:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/65/1/LM0219008 %20ITL %20.pdf
  19. Rai A. Economic impact of geographical indications on rural economy. I JAgri Sci. 2017;87(2):156–64.
  20. Pasumarthy R. An analysis of intellectual property rights in India. Intl J Intell Prop Law. 2020;11(2):1–4.
  21. Cardoso VA, Lourenzani AE, Caldas MM, Bernardo CH, Bernardo R. The benefits and barriers of geographical indications to producers: A review. Renewable Agri Food Sys. 2022;37(6):707–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052200031X
  22. Robinson L. Digital traceability for geographical indications: The future of sustainable trade. World Tr Rev. 2020;25(1):115–32.
  23. Cassago AL, Artêncio MM, de Moura Engracia Giraldi J, Da Costa FB. Metabolomics as a marketing tool for geographical indication products: a literature review. Euro Food Res Technol. 2021;247(9):2143?59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03782-2
  24. Fanning E, Eyres G, Frew R, Kebede B. Linking cocoa quality attributes to its origin using geographical indications. Food Control. 2023;151:109825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109825
  25. Das A, Mishra RR. Compound annual growth (CAGR) rate of fresh tea leaf (Camellia sinensis) production in Assam: a statistical approach. Available at SSRN 3728002. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728002.
  26. Poetschki K, Peerlings J, Dries L. The impact of geographical indications on farm incomes in the EU olives and wine sector. Bri Food J. 2021 ;123(13):579–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1119
  27. Ngokkuen C, Grote U. Impact of geographical indication adoption on household welfare and poverty reduction. Intl J Arts Sci. 2012;5(6):277.
  28. Jena PR, Grote U. Impact evaluation of traditional Basmati rice cultivation in Uttarakhand state of northern India: what implications does it hold for Geographical Indications?. World Development. 2012;40(9):1895–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.004
  29. Radhika AM, Thomas KJ, Kuruvila A, Raju RK. Assessing the impact of geographical indications on well-being of rice farmers in Kerala. Intl J Intell Prop Rights. 2018;9(2):1–11.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.