Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in an eighteen-year-old teak plantation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7329
Submitted
20 January 2025
Published
13-03-2025
Versions

Abstract

A study on litterfall and nutrient dynamics in an 18-year-old teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) plantation was carried out at Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam. The total litterfall for the entire one-year study period was found to be 11255 kg ha-1, of which the leaf litter alone accounted the maximum share of 81.90 % to the total litterfall, followed by the twigs (6.50%), fruits (6.30 %) and flowers (5.30 %). A total of, 110.26 kg ha-1 of nitrogen (N) was returned to the soil through the total litterfall. The total annual P return through litterfall was 17.50 kg ha-1 of which leaves accounted for 75.00 % to the total return, followed by flowers (12.60 %), fruits (10.70 %) and twigs (5.10 %). The total annual potassium (K) return from various litter components was 35.03 kg ha-1 of which, the major share was from leaf litter (79.80 %). The annual total return of calcium (Ca) from litterfall was 348.97 kg ha-1 and magnesium (Mg) return was 78.46 kg ha-1. This study concluded that leaf litter was the primary source of nutrients. Among the return of nutrients, Ca was returned to the soil in greater quantities, followed by N > Mg > K > P.

References

  1. Santosa S, Umar MR, Priosambodo D, Santosa RA. Estimation of biomass, carbon stocks and leaf litter decomposition rate in teak Tectona grandis linn plantations in city forest of hasanuddin university, Makassar. International Journal of Plant Biology. 2020;11(1):8541. https://doi.org/10.4081/pb.2020.8541
  2. Adedeji, Oludare H, Gbadegesin, Adeniyi S. Retracted: comparing throughfall and litterfall nutrient fluxes in a rubber (Hevea brasiliensis willd. muell-arg) plantation agro-ecosystem at Ikenne, South-west Nigeria. Applied Environmental Research. 2014;36:3(2). https://doi.org/10.35762/AER.2014.36.3.2
  3. Sugur GV. Litter production and nutrient cycling of different species under plantation conditions. My Forest. 1989;25:43-9.
  4. Humphries EC. Mineral components and ash analysis. Modern methods of plant analysis. Vol. I. (Ed.). K. Paech and M.V. Traky, Springer-Verlag, Berling 1. 1956; 468-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25300-7_17
  5. Jackson Ml. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1958, ed. 1973.
  6. Singh RP. Studies of annual net production, mineral standing state and energy accumulation pattern of Eucalyptus tereticornis Smith. in Western Uttar Pradesh. Ph.D. Thesis, Meerut University. 1975.
  7. Bray JR, Gorham E. Litter production in forests of the world. Advances in Ecological Research. 1964;2:101-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
  8. Rajagopal K, George M, Buvaneswaran C, Vijayan CV. Litter production and nutrient return in teak plantation. Adv in Forestry Res in India. 2001;24:136-50.
  9. Totey NG, Bhowmik AK, Khatri PK. Nutrient cycling under teak plantation. Journal of Tropical Forestry. 1998;14(11):124-28.
  10. Nisharaj S, Paulsamy S, Sekaran S. Litterfall and nutrient return in four tropical deciduous forests of western ghats. My Forest. 2003; 39(1):25-30.
  11. Omkar Singh DC, Sharma, Rawat JK. Production and decomposition of leaf litter in sal, teak, Eucalyptus and poplar forest in U.P. Ind Forester. 1993;119(2):112-21.
  12. Hosur GC, Darog GS, Satyanarayana T. Litter production and nutrient return of different tree species under plantation conditions. Ind Jr of Forestry. 1997;20:231-35.
  13. George M. Litter production and nutrient return in Eucalyptus hybrid plantations. Ind Forester. 1982;108(4):253-60.
  14. Rajagopal K, Buvaneswaran C, Subramanian V, George M. Nutrient cycling in young teak plantation. I. Restitution of nutrients through litter and rain wash. Ind Forester. 2005;131(2):221-28.
  15. George M, Varghese G. Nutrient cycle in Tectona grandis plantation. Jr of Tropical Forestry. 1992;8:127-33.
  16. Nakagawa M, Ushio M, Kume T, Nakashizuka T. Seasonal and long-term patterns in litterfall in a Bornean tropical rainforest. Ecol Res. 2019;34:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.1003
  17. Wang ZB, Ji M, Li YX, Zhang HD, Li YL, Gong SF, et al. Effects of nitrogen addition and litter management on soil chemistry of larch plantations in North China. West China For Sci. 2021;50:26–32.
  18. Spohn M, Berg B. Import and release of nutrients during the first five years of plant litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;176:108878. https://doi.org/.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108878
  19. Neumann ML, Ukonmaanaho J, Johnson S, Benham L, Vesterdal R, Novotný A, et al. Quantifying carbon and nutrient input from litterfall in European forests using field observations and modeling. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2018;32:784–98. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005825
  20. Kitayama K, Ushio M, Aiba SI. Temperature is a dominant driver of distinct annual seasonality of leaf litter production of equatorial tropical rain forests. J Ecol. 2020; 109:727–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13500

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.