Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Ethnomedicine and women agripreneurs: Exploring the dynamics of entry and growth

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7386
Submitted
23 January 2025
Published
27-06-2025 — Updated on 01-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

Women agripreneurs are emerging as vital contributors to local economies through their cultivation and commercialization of medicinal plants, drawing on generations of traditional knowledge. Ethnomedicine, rooted in indigenous healing practices, aligns naturally with women’s roles as caregivers, herbalists and cultivators, positioning them as both knowledge holders and innovators. This study examines the factors influencing women’s entry and engagement in the ethnomedicine sector in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, emphasizing the growing significance of plant-based knowledge in rural entrepreneurship and sustainable development. Grounded in Social Cognitive Theory, this research investigates how self-efficacy, outcome expectations, social influence and entrepreneurial experience affect entrepreneurial behavior, with intention as a mediating factor. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the study reveals that self-efficacy and social influence significantly predict intention, which in turn strongly influences behavior. Women actively engaged in cultivating species such as Ocimum tenuiflorum (Tulsi), Phyllanthus emblica (Amla) and Aloe barbadensis (Aloe Vera), reflecting a fusion of ancestral knowledge and agribusiness innovation. Entrepreneurial intention strongly predicts actual behavior. Selfefficacy and social influence emerged as key drivers, reflecting the importance of personal confidence and community support. Outcome expectations also had a positive effect while entrepreneurial experience showed no significant impact, suggesting that domain-specific knowledge and cultural factors matter more than prior business exposure. Empowering women in ethnomedicine not only preserves invaluable traditional knowledge but also contributes to the development of sustainable rural health systems and enhances economic resilience.

References

  1. 1. Viu AFM, De Oliveira VMA, De Oliveira CLZ. Etnobotânica: uma questão de gênero?. Rev Bras Agroecol. 2010;5(1). Available from: https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/25047/
  2. 2. Guimbo ID, Mueller JG, Larwanou M. Ethnobotanical knowledge of men, women and children in rural Niger: a mixed-methods approach. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2011;9:235–42. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.9.0.235-242
  3. 3. Torri M. Bioprospecting and commercialisation of biological resources by indigenous communities in India. Sci Technol Soc. 2011;16(2):123–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172181001600201
  4. 4. Reyes-García V, Godoy R, Vadez V, Apaza L, Byron E, Huanca T, et al. Ethnobotanical knowledge shared widely among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Science. 2003;299(5613):1707. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080274
  5. 5. Katerere DR, Applequist W, Flaster T. Hurdles in the commercialization of tribal and indigenous knowledge-derived technologies. In: CRC Press eBooks; 2019. p. 273–83 https://doi.org/10.1201/b21965-14
  6. 6. Reinten E, Coetzee JH, Janick J, Whipkey A. Commercialization of South African indigenous crops: aspects of research and cultivation of products. In: Commercialization of South African Indigenous Crops; 2002. p. 76–80 Available from: https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/ncnu02/pdf/reinten.pdf
  7. 7. Bussmann RW, Sharon D. Medicinal plants of the Andes and the Amazon - The magic and medicinal flora of Northern Peru. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2016;15:1–295. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.15.2.001-295
  8. 8. Hishe M, Asfaw Z, Giday M. Review on value chain analysis of medicinal plants and the associated challenges. J Med Plants Stud. 2016;4(3):45–55. Available from: https://www.plantsjournal.com/archives/2016/vol4issue3/PartA/4-2-12.pdf
  9. 9. Mpelangwa EM, Makindara JR, Sørensen OJ, Bengesi KM. The value chain of traded products of medicinal plants in Tanzania: the emerging role of formulators. Afr J Econ Manag Stud. 2021;13(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-06-2021-0287
  10. 10. Jütte R, Heinrich M, Helmstädter A, Langhorst J, Meng G, Niebling W, et al. Herbal medicinal products - Evidence and tradition from a historical perspective. J Ethnopharma. 2017;207:220–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.047
  11. 11. Magendiran M, Vijayakumar KK. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used by Malayali tribes in Jawadhu hills of Eastern Ghats, Tamilnadu, India. J Med Herbs Ethnomed. 2022;8:7–11. https://doi.org/10.25081/jmhe.2022.v8.7711
  12. 12. Prabhu S, Vijayakumar S, Yabesh JM, Prakashbabu R, Murugan R. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in Pachamalai Hills of Tamil Nadu, India. J Herb Med. 2021;25:100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100400
  13. 13. Ayyanar M, Ignacimuthu S. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants commonly used by Kani tribals in Tirunelveli hills of Western Ghats, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;134(3):851–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.029
  14. 14. Rana N, Gupta P, Singh H, Nagarajan K. Role of bioactive compounds, novel drug delivery systems and polyherbal formulations in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2023;27(3):353–85. https://doi.org/10.2174/1386207326666230914103714
  15. 15. Nisha MC, Rajeshkumar S. Survey of crude drugs from Coimbatore city. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2010;1(3):376–83. Available from: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/10285/1/IJNPR%201%283%29%20376-383.pdf
  16. 16. Sahu PK, Giri DD, Singh R, Pandey P, Gupta S, Shrivastava AK, et al. Therapeutic and medicinal uses of Aloe vera: a review. Pharmacol Pharm. 2013;4(08):599. https://doi.org/10.4236/pp.2013.48086
  17. 17. Baliga MS, Dsouza JJ. Amla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn), a wonder berry in the treatment and prevention of cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(3):225–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834473f4
  18. 18. Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo M. Impact of plant products on innate and adaptive immune system of cultured finfish and shellfish. Aquaculture. 2011;317(1-4):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.03.039
  19. 19. Mishra L, Singh BB, Dagenais S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review. PubMed. 2000;5(4):334–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10956379
  20. 20. Orhan IE. Centella asiatica (L.) Urban: From traditional medicine to modern medicine with neuroprotective potential. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:946259. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/946259
  21. 21. Subapriya R, Nagini S. Medicinal properties of neem leaves: a review. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2005;5(2):149–56. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568011053174828
  22. 22. Iweala EJ, Uche ME, Dike ED, Etumnu LR, Dokunmu TM, Oluwapelumi AE, et al. Curcuma longa (Turmeric): Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry, pharmacological activities and toxicity profiles-A review. Pharmacol Res Mod Chin Med. 2023;6:100222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prmcm.2023.100222
  23. 23. Jayakumar K. Ethno medicinal value of plants in Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu, India. Int Letters Nat Sci. 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilns.29.33
  24. 24. Ravishankar B, Shukla VJ. Indian systems of medicine: a brief profile. African J Trad Comp Alt Med. 2007;4(3):319–37. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajtcam.v4i3.31226
  25. 25. Muleady-Mecham NE, Schley S. Ethnomedicine in healthcare systems of the world: semester at sea pilot survey in 11 countries. Global Health Action. 2009;2(1):1969. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v2i0.1969
  26. 26. Pieroni A, Price LL, Vandebroek I. Welcome to journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005;1:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-1-1
  27. 27. Ayyanar M. Traditional herbal medicines for primary healthcare among indigenous people in Tamil Nadu, India. J Homeo Ayur Med. 2013;2(5):1–7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1206.1000140
  28. 28. Fabrega Jr H. The idea of medicalization: An anthropological perspective. Per Biol Med. 1980;24(1):129–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1980.0091
  29. 29. Matas A. Religion, place and identity at the intersection of cultural bricolage: The Miami Santo Daime Church Revisited. https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.fidc009187
  30. 30. Voeks RA. Are women reservoirs of traditional plant knowledge? Gender, ethnobotany and globalization in Northeast Brazil. Singapore J Trop Geo. 2007;28(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00273.x
  31. 31. Transformation of traditional knowledge of medicinal plants: the case of Tyroleans (Austria) who migrated to Australia, Brazil and Peru. J Ethnobio Ethnomed. 2012;8:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-44
  32. 32. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology. 2009;3(3):110–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0303_03
  33. 33. Cervone D, Shadel WG, Jencius S. Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personal Soc Psych Rev. 2001;5(1):33–51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_3
  34. 34. Abdullah SM. Social cognitive theory: A Bandura thought review. Psikodimensia: Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi. 2019;18(1):85–100. https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708
  35. 35. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Changing behaviour using social cognitive theory. In: Hagger MS, Cameron DL, Kyra H, Nelli H, Taru L, editors. The Handbook of Behaviour Change. 2020;2:32–45 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.003
  36. 36. Pihie ZA, Bagheri A. Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediation effect of self-regulation. Voca Learn. 2013;6:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-013-9101-9
  37. 37. Khodabakhshi S. Evaluating the role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention of Tehran university (Case study of engineering campus). J Edu Voca Res. 2012;3(3):82–88. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i3.53
  38. 38. Zhao H, Seibert SE, Hills GE. The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. J Appli Psych. 2005;90(6):1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
  39. 39. Santos SC, Liguori EW. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intentions: Outcome expectations as mediator and subjective norms as moderator. Int J Entrepre Behav Res. 2020;26(3):400–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-07-2019-0436
  40. 40. Engle RL, Schlaegel C, Delanoe S. The role of social influence, culture and gender on entrepreneurial intent. J Small Business Entrepre. 2011;24(4):471–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2011.10593549
  41. 41. Bozward D, Rogers-Draycott M. Exploring the impact of entrepreneurial experience on future entrepreneurship aspirations. Entrepre Edu. 2024:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-024-00121-w
  42. 42. Karim MS, Sena V, Hart M. Developing entrepreneurial career intention in entrepreneurial university: the role of counterfactual thinking. Studies in Higher Education. 2022;47(5):1023–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2055326
  43. 43. Streiner DL. Building a better model: an introduction to structural equation modelling. Canadian J Psych. 2006;51(5):317–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370605100507
  44. 44. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Personal Social Psych. 1986;51(6):1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  45. 45. Kappel TA. Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future. J Product Innov Manage. 2001;18(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(00)00066-7
  46. 46. Dhanya K, Ashok KR, Arthanari PM. Socio-economic profile of women agripreneurs in western Tamil Nadu. Curr J Appli Sci Technol. 2022;41(13):8–13. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2022/v41i1331709
  47. 47. Afthanorhan A, Ghazali PL, Rashid N. Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell and Larcker and HTMT approaches. J Phy Conf Series. 2021;1874(1):012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085
  48. 48. Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. J Cons Res. 1994:381–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405
  49. 49. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43:115–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  50. 50. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  51. 51. Hair JJF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal. 2017;1(2):107–23. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.087624
  52. 52. Chin WW. Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In: Vinzi VE, Wynne WC, Wang H, editors. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 83–97 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.