Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Better concentration of cue-lure and sticky trap combination for monitoring and mass trapping of melon fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7769
Submitted
16 February 2025
Published
11-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

Fruit fly species (family: Tephritidae) are a major pest of cucurbits, leading to a significant reduction in the crop yields. Among all species infesting cucurbits, Zeugodacus cucurbitae is the major pest. Both monitoring and mass trapping of Z. cucurbitae heavily rely on ‘male annihilation technique, using cue-lure (CL) male attractant-based traps embedded with killing agents/pesticides. To evaluate the effectiveness of CL concentrations in combination with different traps against Z. cucurbitae, the following field study was conducted in a sponge gourd field during the 2023 zaid season. Among all treatments, the highest mean weekly trap catches of Z. cucurbitae (fly captures per trap per week, FTW) were recorded with 25 % CL combined with blue sticky traps (10.16 ± 0.99). Seasonal incidence studies revealed that the population exhibited fluctuations, peaking at 9.80 ± 1.29 FTW during the 17th Standard Meteorological Week (SMW), followed by a decline with occasional secondary peaks during the 20th and 27th SMW. Correlation analysis between the population and weather parameters indicated significant negative correlations with minimum temperature (r = -0.666, p = 0.004) and wind speed (r = -0.604, p = 0.013) at 5 % level of significance. These factors accounted for 44.4 % and 36.5 % of the population fluctuation, respectively. Collectively, all weather parameters influenced the population to an extent of 60.3 %. The present study provides a pesticide-free approach for the management of the melon fruit fly, after considering all the weather factors influencing the results.

References

  1. 1. Gyawali P, Bohara K, Rijal S, Karki N, Shahi JA. Comprehensive review on integrated pest management of melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae). Int J Pest Manag. 2023:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2023.2278052
  2. 2. De Meyer M, Delatte H, Mwatawala M, Quilici S, Vayssières JF, Virgilio MA. Review of the current knowledge on Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Africa, with a list of species included in Zeugodacus. ZooKeys. 2015;540:39. 10.3897/zookeys.540.9672
  3. 3. McQuate GT, Liquido NJ, Nakamichi KA. Annotated world bibliography of host plants of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insecta Mundi. 2017;0527:1–339.
  4. 4. Nair N, Pal P. Seasonal incidence of fruit fly (Zeugodacus cucurbitae) in cucurbit ecosystem in Tripura, NE India. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8(6):1253–56.
  5. 5. Bharadiya AM, Bhut JB. Effect of different insecticides against fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett infesting sponge gourd. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(5):1866–68.
  6. 6. Abrol D, Gupta D, Sharma I. Evaluation of insecticides, biopesticides and clay for the management of fruit fly, Bactrocera spp. infesting bottle gourd. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7(1):311–14.
  7. 7. Tan KH, Nishida R, Jang EB, Shelly TE. Pheromones, male lures and trapping of Tephritid fruit flies. In: T Shelly, N Epsky, E Jang, J Reyes-Flores, R Vargas (Eds.), Trapping and the detection, control and Rregulation of tephritid fruit flies. Springer. 2014.
  8. 8. Sunda S, Arya V, Narayana S, Venkateshaih A, Divekar P. Evaluation of different concentrations of cue-lure for effective management of the melon fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), in cucurbits ecosystem. J Environ Biol. 2024;45:268–76.
  9. 9. Vargas RI, Shelly TE, Leblanc L, Pinero JC. Recent advances in methyl eugenol and cue-lure technologies for fruit fly detection, monitoring and control in Hawaii. Vitamins & Hormones. 2010;83:575–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(10)83023-7
  10. 10. Lehman KA, Barahona DC, Manoukis NC, Carvalho LA, De Faveri SG, Auth JE, et al. Raspberry ketone trifluoroacetate trapping of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol. 2019;112(3):1306–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz006
  11. 11. Nayak US, Mahapatra SS. Efficacy of integrated pest management (IPM) modules against fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae C.) in bitter gourd. Vegetable Science. 2020;47(1):127–30.
  12. 12. Regmi P, Bhattarai P, Bhattarai AM. Comparative assessment of different baits for monitoring and management of fruit flies (Bcatrocera spp.) in Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal. Sustainability in Food and Agriculture. 2024;5(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.26480/sfna.01.2024.44.51
  13. 13. Gupta A, Regmi R. Efficacy of different homemade and commercial baits in monitoring of fruit flies at Maranthana, Pyuthan, Nepal. Malays J of Sustain Agric. 2022;6(2):101–09.
  14. 14. Gaddanakeri S, Rolania K, Duhan DS. Monitoring of melon fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae Coquillett population using para-pheromone traps in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Int J Environ Clim. 2023;13(8):396–404.
  15. 15. Nair N, Chatterjee M, De B, Das K, Sehgal M. Studies on traps and attractants for monitoring and mass trapping of fruit flies (Diptera:Tephritidae) in cucurbit ecosystem in Tripura, NE India. J Entomol Res. 2022;46(1):87–92.
  16. 16. Sowmiya L, Chandrasekaran M, Soundararajan RP, Ramesh D. Influence of weather factors on the occurrence, population fluctuation and species diversity of fruit flies in snake gourd ecosystem. Int J Curr Microbial App Sci. 2020;9(9):165–73. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.020
  17. 17. Sen K, Dhar PP, Samanta A. Evaluation and development of some eco-friendly integrated pest management (IPM) modules in bitter gourd to minimize melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett) infestation under lower Gangetic plain region of West Bengal, India. J Entomol Res. 2022;46(3):505–14. http://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2022.00089.5
  18. 18. Reddy AGK, Nirmala G, Pankaj PK, Reddy BS, Samuel J, Shankar KR. Good Horticultural Practices (GHP) for effective resource conservation and productivity in vegetables. Indian Farming. 2023;73(5):19–21.
  19. 19. Ahmad S, Jaworski CC, Ullah F, Jamil M, Badshah H, Ullah F, et al. Efficacy of lure mixtures in baited traps to attract different fruit fly species in guava and vegetable fields. Front Insect Sci. 2023;2:984348. https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2022.984348
  20. 20. Inskeep JR, Spafford H, Shelly TE. Trapping male melon flies, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae), using mixtures of zingerone and cue-lure in the field. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomol Soc. 2018;50:67–75.
  21. 21. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Kido MH, Ketter HM, Whitehand LC. Methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for suppression of male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii: effects of lure mixtures and weathering. J Econ Entomol. 2000;93(1):81–7. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.1.81
  22. 22. Arya V, Srinivasa N, Tyagi S, Raju SVS. A guide to prepare cue-lure for Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) management in cucurbits. Indian Entomologist. 2022;3(1):45–7.
  23. 23. David KJ, Ramani S. An illustrated key to fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Peninsular India and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Zootaxa. 2011;3021(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3231.1.1.4
  24. 24. Pearson K. VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1895;58(347-352):240–42. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
  25. 25. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2021.
  26. 26. Jakhar S, Kumar V, Jakhar BL, Baloda AS. Incidence and intensity of melon fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) under different weather regimes of semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 2021;27(2):185-89.
  27. 27. Sohrab WH, Prasad CS. Investigation on level of infestation and management of cucurbit fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) in different cucurbit crops. Int J Pure App Biosci. 2010;6(1):184–96.
  28. 28. Barma P, Jha S. Biology, seasonal activity of fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coq.) on pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.) and weather relations. J Plant Prot Res. 2011;3(1):48–53.
  29. 29. Sharma R, Sohal SK. Oviposition response of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) to different phenolic compounds. J Biopest. 2016;9(1):46.
  30. 30. Abdel-Ghany SE, Day I, Heuberger AL, Broeckling CD, Reddy AS. Production of phloroglucinol, a platform chemical, in Arabidopsis using a bacterial gene. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):38483.
  31. 31. Kamat S, Kumari M, Sajna KV, Singh SK, Kumar AK, Jayabaskaran C. Improved chrysin production by a combination of fermentation factors and elicitation from Chaetomium globosum. Microorganisms. 2023;11(4):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040999
  32. 32. Puri S, Singh S, Sohal SK. Inhibitory effect of chrysin on growth, development and oviposition behaviour of melon fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Phytoparasitica. 2022;50(1):151–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00940-w
  33. 33. Puri S, Singh S, Sohal SK. Oviposition behaviour and biochemical response of an insect pest, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) to plant phenolic compound phloroglucinol. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C. Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2022;255:109291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2022.109291
  34. 34. Radhika, Bantewad SD, Reddy KV. Seasonal occurrence of melon fruit flies (Zeugodacus cucurbitae Coq.) and its natural enemies on bitter gourd. Int J Environ Clim. 2023;13(11):3243–49. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113496
  35. 35. Khan MA, Gogi DA, Khaliq A, Subhani MN, Ali A. Efficacy of methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for monitoring melon fruit fly in relation to environmental conditions in bitter gourd. J Agric Res. 2010;48(4):525–30.
  36. 36. Rao CN, Ghike S. Population dynamics of four species of fruit flies, Bactrocera spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to weather parameters in Nagpur Mandarin. Journal of Insect Science. 2016;29(1):17–24.
  37. 37. Abhilash J, Naveen NE, Patil SU, Sharanabasappa MK. Monitoring of melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) Col. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to weather parameters. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(5):1930–35.
  38. 38. Amin MR, Nancy NP, Miah MRU, Miah MG, Kwon O, Suh SJ. Fluctuations in fruit fly abundance and infestation in sweet gourd fields in relation to varied meteorological factors. Entomol Res. 2019;49(5):223–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12351
  39. 39. Wazir ZA, Singh AK, Ramana N. Seasonal incidence of fruit fly on summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) and effect of weather parameters on population dynamics of fruit fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7(5):167–70.
  40. 40. Al Mtarfi TIT, Al Shammary NS. Evaluation of sticky traps and baits in control of melon fly, Dacus frontalis Becker on melon. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023;1214(1):012040. I
  41. 41. Sardana HR, Bhat MN, Choudhary, M. Efficacy of coloured sticky traps in capturing fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae in bitter gourd. Ann Plant Sci. 2020;28(1):89–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-0163.2020.00021.X
  42. 42. Wang A, Peng S, Zeng B, Lian Y, Jia J, Zhang Q, et al. Preparation and evaluation of a temperature-sensitive cuelure nano-controlled release agent. Agronomy. 2024;14(7):1578. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071578
  43. 43. Liu X, Zhang Q, Xu W, Yang Y, Fan Q, Ji Q. The effect of cuelure on attracting and feeding behavior in Zeugodacus tau (walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects. 2023;14(11):836. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110836
  44. 44. Gregg PC, Del Socorro AP, Landolt PJ. Advances in attract-and-kill for agricultural pests: beyond pheromones. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018;63(1):453–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035040
  45. 45. Pribadi AK, Chalasani SH. Fear conditioning in invertebrates. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2022;16:1008818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1008818

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.