Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Exploration of the descriptive phyto-geography of genus Rubus: A systematic review with global and Indian perspectives

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7780
Submitted
17 February 2025
Published
23-05-2025 — Updated on 31-05-2025
Versions

Abstract

The genus Rubus L., belonging to the family Rosaceae, subfamily Rosoideae and tribe Potentilleae, with over 1454 species worldwide, plays a crucial role in ecological systems and is considered one of the most invasive groups of species in the world. Along with its invasive nature, different species of this genus are valued for their nutritional and medicinal benefits. Despite its importance, the phyto-geographical distribution of Rubus remains underexplored, particularly in terms of its global and regional (Indian) biodiversity. Rubus species are predominantly distributed across the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere, with their natural range extending from sea level to elevations of approximately 4500 meters. This review investigates the phyto-geographical distribution patterns of Rubus species, exploring their ecological adaptations and distribution across diverse global landscapes. We synthesize findings from a wide range of biogeographical studies, examining key determinants and factors influencing species distribution, climate resilience and spread across different continents. Ecological aspects are also addressed, emphasizing their role in pollination as well as their pharmaceutical benefits. Additionally, the review focuses on Rubus species in India, a region known for its distinct ecosystems and high levels of endemism. By integrating global and regional perspectives, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the phyto-geographical dynamics of Rubus, offering valuable insights for future research on this genus.

References

  1. 1. Graham J, Brennan R. Introduction to the Rubus genus. In: Graham J, Brennan R, editors. Raspberry. Cham: Springer. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99031-6_1
  2. 2. Du X, Finn CE, Qian MC. Volatile composition and odour-activity value of thornless ‘Black Diamond’ and ‘Marion’ blackberries. Food Chem. 2010;119:1127-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.024
  3. 3. Miller MG, Shukitt-Hale B. Berry fruit enhances beneficial signaling in the brain. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:5709-15. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2036033
  4. 4. Dragišić Maksimović JJ, Milivojević JM, Poledica MM, Nikolić MD, Maksimović VM. Profiling anti-oxidant activity of two primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars (Autumn Bliss and Polka). J Food Compos Anal. 2013;31:173-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.008
  5. 5. Chen J, Du J, Li M, Li C. Degradation kinetics and pathways of red raspberry anthocyanins in model and juice systems and their correlation with color and anti-oxidant changes during storage. LWT. 2020;128:109448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109448
  6. 6. Hansen S. How flower visitation of remnant grassland patches is affected by commercial timber plantations and an invasive alien species (Rubus cuneifolius) (dissertation). Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University. 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/98051
  7. 7. Meng Q, Manghwar H, Hu W. Study on supergenus Rubus L. Edible, medicinal and phylogenetic characterization. Plants. 2022;11:1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091211
  8. 8. Graham J, Woodhead M. Rubus. In: Kole C, editor. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and breeding resources. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16057-8_9
  9. 9. Ehrich D, Alsos IG, Brochmann C. Where did the northern peatland species survive the dry glacials: Cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) as an example. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:801-14.
  10. 10. Wang Y, Chen Q, Chen T, Tang H, Liu L, Wang X. Phylogenetic insights into Chinese Rubus (Rosaceae) from multiple chloroplast and nuclear DNAs. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00968
  11. 11. Currie DJ, Francis AP. Regional versus climate effect on taxon richness in angiosperms: Reply to Qian and Ricklefs. Am Nat. 2004;163:780-85.
  12. 12. Rocabado GM, Bedoya LM, Abad MJ, Bermejo P. Rubus-A review of its phytochemical and pharmacological profile. Nat Prod Commun. 2008;3:423-36.
  13. 13. Van Wyk BE. Phytomedicines, herbal drugs and poisons. University of Chicago Press. 2015.
  14. 14. Yang J, Pak H, Maki M, Kim C. Multiple origins and the population genetic structure of Rubus takesimensis (Rosaceae) on Ulleung Island: Implications for the genetic consequences of anagenetic speciation. PLoS One. 2019;14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222707
  15. 15. Gonzalez-Espinosa M, Rey-Benayas JM, Ramirez-Marcial N, Huston MA, Golicher D. Tree diversity in the northern neotropics: Regional patterns in high diverse Chiapas, Mexico. Ecography. 2004;27:741-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.04103.x
  16. 16. Martin MF, Walsh AB, Gonzalez P. Evolutionary history and speciation in Rubus: A molecular approach to understanding the distribution of diversity in the genus. Mol Ecol. 2023;32:2536-51.
  17. 17. Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, Yao L, Estill J, Bian Z, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: The PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19:208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3
  18. 18. IUCN Red List. Rubus species in India. 2021.
  19. 19. Grulich V. Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. Preslia. 2012;84:631-45.
  20. 20. Real MS. A phenetic analysis of Philippine Rubus species (Rosaceae) by morphology. Philipp J Syst Biol. 2020;13(1). https://doi.org/10.26757/PJSB2019A13009
  21. 21. Mehiou A, Alla C, Akissi ZL, Lucau-Danila A, Bouanani N, Legssyer A, et al. Rubus ulmifolius Schott: A comprehensive review of its botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological effects. J Berry Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/18785093241283261
  22. 22. Caplan J, Yeakley A. Rubus armeniacus (Himalayan Blackberry) occurrence and growth in relation to soil and light conditions in western Oregon. Northwest Sci. 2006:80.
  23. 23. Plants for a Future. Rubus niveus. https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Rubus+niveus
  24. 24. Govaerts R, Nic Lughadha E, Black N, Turner R, Paton A. The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci Data. 2021;8:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6
  25. 25. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2023.
  26. 26. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2024.
  27. 27. Plants for a Future. Rubus thyrsanthus. https://pfaf.org/user/plant.aspx?latinname=rubus+thyrsanthus
  28. 28. Givnish TJ. On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J Ecol. 1999;87(2):193-210. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00333.x
  29. 29. Good R. The geography of flowering plants. London: Longman. 1947.
  30. 30. Kew RBG. Plants of the world online. Achyranthes bidentata. 2018;58678-71.
  31. 31. Gustafsson A. The origin and properties of the European blackberry flora. Hereditas. 1942;28(1):249-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1942.tb03279.x
  32. 32. Focke WO. Species ruborum. Monographiae generis rubi prodromus. Vol.17. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart. 1914.
  33. 33. Brainerd E, Peitersen AK. Blackberries of New England: Their classification. Vt Agric Exp Stn Bull. 1920;(217):1-84.
  34. 34. Gu Y, Zhao CM, Jin W, Li WL. Evaluation of Rubus germplasm resources in China. Acta Hortic. 1993;352:317-24. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.352.45
  35. 35. Huang J, Hu J. Revision of Rubus (Rosaceae) in Taiwan. Taiwania. 2009;54(4):285-310.
  36. 36. Jennings DL. Raspberries and blackberries: Their breeding, diseases and growth. London: Academic Press. 1988.
  37. 37. Fryer JL. Rubus armeniacus, R. bifrons: Himalayan blackberry. In: Fire effects information system (Internet). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). 2021. https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/rubspp/all.html
  38. 38. Widrlechner MP. The genus Rubus L. in Iowa. Castanea. 1998;63(4):415-65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4033996
  39. 39. Carter KA, Liston A, Bassil NV, Alice LA, Bushakra JM, Sutherland BL, et al. Target capture sequencing unravels Rubus evolution. bioRxiv. 2019:703926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01615
  40. 40. Kalkman C. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in Malesia. The subgenus Micranthobatus. Blumea. 1987;32:323-41.
  41. 41. Bean A. Revision of Rubus subgenus Micranthobatus (Fritsch) Kalkman (Rosaceae) in Australia. Austrobaileya. 1995;4(3):321-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41738867
  42. 42. Kosiński P. The genus Rubus in the Bardo Mts (Central Sudetes). Dendrobiology. 2010;63:77-98.
  43. 43. Krivošej Z, Prodanović D, Preljević N, Veljković B. Rubus laciniatus Willd (Rosaceae), an introduced species new in the flora of Serbia and the Balkans. Bot Serb. 2018;42(2):255-58. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1468362
  44. 44. Király G. Alien Rubus species in Hungary: Distribution, habitats and threats. Dendrobiology. 2018;80:1-1.
  45. 45. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgess NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, et al. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1980:499.
  46. 46. Abbate G, Bonacquisti S, Scassellat E. Morphological study of three taxa of the genus Rubus L. sect. Rubus (Rosaceae) in Western Central Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2002;136(3):321-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500212331351219
  47. 47. Helminger T. Checklist of the brambles (Rubus L. subgenus Rubus, Rosaceae) of Luxembourg. Bull Soc Nat Luxemb. 2009;110:53-67.
  48. 48. Monasterio-Huelin E, Webert HE. Taxonomy and nomenclature of Rubus ulmifolius and Rubus sanctus (Rosaceae). Edinb J Bot. 1996;53:311-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428600003759
  49. 49. Sarhanov P, Sharbel TF, Sochor M, Vasut RJ, Dancak M, Travníček B. Hybridization drives evolution of apomicts in Rubus subgenus Rubus: Evidence from microsatellite markers. Ann Bot. 2017;120:317-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx033
  50. 50. Matthews HD, Weaver AJ, Meissner KJ, Gillett NP, Ebby M. Natural and anthropogenic climate change: incorporating historical land cover change, vegetation dynamics and the global carbon cycle. Clim Dyn. 2003;22:461-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0392-2
  51. 51. Qian H, Ricklefs RE. Taxon richness and climate in angiosperms: is there a globally consistent relationship that precludes region effect? Am Nat. 2004;163:773-79. https://doi.org/10.1086/383097
  52. 52. Zieliński J. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in Poland. Polish Academy of Sciences, W. Szafer Institute of Botany. 2004:300.
  53. 53. Kosiński P, Maliński T, Nobis M, Rojek-Jelonek M, Tomaszewski D, Dering M, et al. Rubus kaznowskii (Rosaceae), a new bramble species from south-central Poland. PhytoKeys. 2021;185:27-41. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.185.71193
  54. 54. Dujmović PD, Surać M, Šindrak Z, Voća S, Duralija B. Wild edible species of Rubus at Nature Park Medvednica (NW Croatia). Bull UASVM Agric. 2008;65(1):88-93.
  55. 55. Vavilov NI. The theory of the origin of cultivated plants after Darwin. Soviet Science. 1940;2:55-75.
  56. 56. Vavilov NI. Centers of origin of cultivated plants. Appl Bot Plant Breed. 1926;16(2):1-124.
  57. 57. Vavilov NI. The phyto-geographical basis for plant breeding. Theor Bases Plant Breed, Inst Plant Ind, Moscow. 1935.
  58. 58. Lu L-T. A study on the genus Rubus of China. J Syst Evol. 1983;21(1):13-25.
  59. 59. Gao X, Lin F, Li M, Mei Y, Li Y, Bai Y, et al. Prediction of the potential distribution of a raspberry (Rubus idaeus) in China based on MaxEnt model Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):24438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75559-y
  60. 60. Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale and synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34:273-309. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032
  61. 61. Zandee M, Kalkman C. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in Malesia 1. Subgenera Chamaebatus and Idaeobatus. Blumea. 1981;27:75-113.
  62. 62. Real MS. Update on the geographic distribution of Philippine Rubus species. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. 2016:7-9.
  63. 63. Iwatsuki K, Boufford DE, Ohba H. Flora of Japan. Vol. IIb Archichlamydae. Tokyo: Kodansha. 2001.
  64. 64. Okada A, Kikuchi S, Hoshino Y, Kunitake H, Mimura M. Phylogeny and trait variation of Japanese Rubus subgenus Idaeobatus. Sci Hortic. 2020;264:109-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109150
  65. 65. Espinel Ortiz DA, Romoleroux K, Böhnert T, Weigend M. Annotated checklist of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) from South America. PhytoKeys. 2024;247:75-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.247.127527
  66. 66. Jaramillo-Díaz P, Guézou A, Mauchamp A, Tye A. CDF Checklist of Galápagos flowering plants - FCD Lista de especies de plantas con flores Galápagos. In: Bungartz F, Herrera H, Jaramillo P, Tirado N, Jiménez-Uzcátegui G, Ruiz D, Guézou A, Ziemmeck F, editors. Charles Darwin foundation Galápagos species checklist - Lista de especies de Galápagos de la Fundación Charles Darwin. Puerto Ayora, Galápagos: Charles Darwin Foundation / Fundación Charles Darwin. 2018.
  67. 67. Romoleroux K. 79 Rosaceae. In: Harling G andersson L, editors. Flora of Ecuador. Vol. 56. Göteborg, Sweden: Univ Gothenburg; Stockholm, Sweden: Riksmuseum; Quito, Ecuador: Pontificia Univ Católica Ecuador. 1996:1-70.
  68. 68. Ballington JR, Luteyn MM, Thompson K, Romoleroux K, Castillo R. Rubus and vacciniaceous germplasm resources in the Andes of Ecuador. Plant Genet Resour News. 1993;93:9-1. http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/4817
  69. 69. Romoleroux K, Pérez A, León-Yánez S, Quintana C, Navarrete H, Muriel P, et al. Base de datos del Herbario QCA, Versión 1.0. Quito, Ecuador: Pontificia Univ Católica Ecuador. 2018.
  70. 70. Sochor M, Trávníček B, Manning JC. Biosystematic revision of the native and naturalised species of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. S Afr J Bot. 2018;118:241-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.07.015
  71. 71. Chatterjee D. Floristic patterns of Indian vegetation. Proc Summer Sch Bot Darjeeling. 1960. New Delhi. 1962:32-42.
  72. 72. Hooker JD. Rosaceae. In: Hooker JD, editor. The Flora of British India. Vol. 2. London, UK. 1878:307-88.
  73. 73. Long DG. Rubus L. In: Grierson AJC, Long DG, editors. Flora of Bhutan. Vol. 1, Part 3. Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden. 1987:543-62.
  74. 74. Gupta C, Dash SS. Rubus sengorensis (Rosaceae): A new record to India from Arunachal Pradesh. Nelumbo. 2015;57:50-5. https://doi.org/10.20324/nelumbo/v57/2015/87087
  75. 75. Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai’i. 2nd ed. Vols 1 and 2. Honolulu: Univ Hawai’i/Bishop Museum Press. 1999.
  76. 76. GRIN (Germplasm Resources Information Network). Online database. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, MD. 2003.
  77. 77. Sasidharan N. Biodiversity documentation for Kerala. Part 6: Flowering plants. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala. 2004:166-67.
  78. 78. Narayanan B, Umesh BT. Lectotypification of the name Rubus micropetalus (Rosaceae). Ann Plant Sci. 2019;7:2352-53.
  79. 79. Gupta C, Dash SS, Brach AR. Lectotypification of two names in the genus Rubus L. (Rosaceae). Phytotaxa. 2016;266:297-300. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.266.4.8
  80. 80. Chowdhery HJ, Wadhwa BM. Flora of Himachal Pradesh. Vols 1-3. Botanical Survey of India, Culcutta. 1984.
  81. 81. Hiregoudar H, Manju, Deepika, Nautiyal BT. Floral biology of wild raspberry (Rubus macilentus C.) species of Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;7:2200-06.
  82. 82. Verma R, Gangrade T, Punasiya R, Ghulaxe C. Rubus fruticosus (blackberry) use as an herbal medicine. Pharmacogn Rev. 2014;8:101-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.134239
  83. 83. Shikha D, Kashyap P. Yellow Himalayan berry. In: Nayik GA, Gull A, editors. Antioxidants in fruits: Properties and health benefits. Singapore: Springer Nature. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7285-2_4
  84. 84. Gupta C, Dash SS. A new species of Rubus (Rosaceae) from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Blumea. 2018;63:26-30. https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2018.63.01.04
  85. 85. Espinel Ortiz DA, Romoleroux K, Böhnert T, Weigend M. Annotated checklist of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) from South America. PhytoKeys. 2024;247:75-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.247.127527
  86. 86. González-Domínguez S, Santillán-Galicia M, Guzmán-Franco AW, Avila-García CDJ, López-Buenfil JA, Romero-Rosales F. Species diversity, population dynamics and spatial distribution of mites on blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius Schott): A comparison between organic and conventionally managed orchards. Phytoparasitica. 2023;51:241-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01051-4
  87. 87. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Rubus L.: blackberry, raspberry. USDA. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nsl/Wpsm/Rubus.pdf
  88. 88. Innes RJ. Rubus phoenicolasius. In: Fire effects information system (online). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). 2009.
  89. 89. Bataw Ali AM. Pollination ecology of cultivated and wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and the behaviour of visiting insects. (Doctoral dissertation). University of St Andrews. 1996. https://hdl.handle.net/10023/14205
  90. 90. Anderson M, Rotheray EL, Mathews F. Marvellous moths! Pollen deposition rate of bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) is greater at night than day. Plos One. 2023:18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281810
  91. 91. Burns C, Villalobos S, Vamosi JC. When less is more: Visitation by generalist pollinators can have neutral or negative effects on plant reproduction. Front Ecol Evol. 2022;10:1012809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1012809
  92. 92. Ryan I. The pollination ecology of cultivated raspberry (Rubus idaeus) in the UK: comparing pollinator supply and demand at field scale. (Doctoral dissertation). University of East Anglia, UK. 2023. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/94367
  93. 93. Hummer KE. Rubus pharmacology: Antiquity to the present. HortScience. 2010;45:1587-91. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.11.1587
  94. 94. Probst Y. A review of the nutrient composition of selected Rubus berries. Nutr Food Sci. 2015;45:242-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-07-2014-0063
  95. 95. Meng Q, Manghwar H, Hu W. Study on super genus Rubus L.: Edible, medicinal and phylogenetic characterization. Plants (Basel). 2022;11:1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091211
  96. 96. Gevrenova R, Zheleva-Dimitrova D, Balabanova V. The genus Rubus L.: An insight into phytochemicals and pharmacological studies of leaves from the most promising species. Pharmacia. 2024;71:1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e124248
  97. 97. Shibu Prasanth SCR, Chandran P. Phytochemical and antimicrobial analysis of leaf samples of different Rubus species. Int J Chem Technol Res. 2017;10:359-68.
  98. 98. Santhosh A, Uma SD, Shankaraiah P, Madhuri T. Phytochemical investigation and antimicrobial anthelmintic activities of the leaves of Rubus moluccanus. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6:1392-96.
  99. 99. Wignall VR, Arscott NA, Nudds HE, Squire A, Green TO, Ratnieks FLW. Thug life: Bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) is a valuable foraging resource for honeybees and diverse flower-visiting insects. Insect Conserv Divers. 2020;13:543-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12436
  100. 100. Gao X, Xiong X, Boufford DE, Gao Y, Xu B, Zhang C. Phylogeny of the diploid species of Rubus (Rosaceae). Genes. 2023;14:1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061152
  101. 101. Rentería JL, Gardener MR, Panetta FD, Atkinson R, Crawley MJ. Possible impacts of the invasive plant Rubus niveus on the native vegetation of the Scalesia forest in the Galápagos Islands. Plos One. 2012;7:48106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.