Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Leveraging agricultural technologies for flood mitigation in coastal Tamil Nadu: Addressing challenges in agriculture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7838
Submitted
20 February 2025
Published
30-05-2025 — Updated on 10-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

Flooding exacerbated by cyclones and heavy monsoons has become a significant challenge for agriculture in Tamil Nadu especially in its coastal regions. This study explores the technological mitigation strategies that can help to reduce the adverse impacts of flooding on agriculture. By focusing on flood-induced crop losses, soil erosion and waterlogging, the research emphasizes the need for innovative agricultural technologies to build resilience in farming practices. The study identifies eight TNAU recommended technological solutions to mitigate flooding stress at field level, including bio stimulants, submergence-tolerant rice varieties, salt-tolerant crops, raised bed systems, polyhouse farming and foliar sprays for crop recovery. Through a survey of farmers and extension officials, the study evaluates awareness, acceptance and adoption of these technologies. Findings indicate that while farmers exhibit high awareness and acceptance of traditional mitigation methods, newer technologies face adoption barriers due to financial and knowledge constraints. The study suggests targeted policy interventions, such as financial incentives, extension services and subsidies, to increase adoption rates. Furthermore, it calls for enhanced collaboration between research institutions, government agencies and farmers to foster a more resilient agricultural system capable of coping with flood-related challenges. This research offers actionable insights to help Tamil Nadu’s agricultural sector adapt to increasingly frequent and intense flooding events.

References

  1. 1. Wilkinson ME, Quinn PF, Hewett CJ. The floods and agriculture risk matrix: A decision support tool for effectively communicating flood risk from farmed landscapes. Int J River Basin Manag. 2013;11(3):237-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2013.794145
  2. 2. Mishra M, Bhattacharyya D, Guria R, Paul S, da Silva RM, Santos CA. Rapid impact assessment of severe cyclone storm Michaung along coastal zones of Andhra and Tamil Nadu, India: A geospatial analysis. J Environ Manage. 2024;370:122369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122369
  3. 3. Bhuvana K, Ganapathy M, Senthil Kumar M, Sampath P, Selvavinayagam TS. From storm to safety: Public health success measures in managing cyclone fengal crisis. 5(6):7.
  4. 4. Abijith D, Saravanan S, Jennifer JJ, Parthasarathy KS, Singh L, Sankriti R. Assessing the impact of damage and government response toward the cyclone Gaja in Tamil Nadu, India. In: Disaster resilience and sustainability. Elsevier. 2021:577-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85195-4.00016-0
  5. 5. Kumar KA, Sudheer KV, Anoosha B, Reddy BS. Tropical cyclones and their impact on agriculture. Chron Bioresour Manag. 2024;8(2):47-51. https://ojs.pphouse.org/index.php/CBM/article/view/5085/2584
  6. 6. Vetrivel K. Economic impact of Gaja cyclone on agriculture in Pudukottai district, Tamil Nadu. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol. 2020;11(8):1011-20. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HR3Z7
  7. 7. Nandhini S, Birundha S. Study report on michaung cyclone-2023. Educ Adm Theory Pract. 2024;30(4):6814-21. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2193
  8. 8. Bureau TH. Cyclone Fengal: Crops on 80,520 hectares damaged in Villupuram district: TN Minister [Internet]. The Hindu. 2024. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/cyclone-fengal-crops-in-80520-hectares-damaged-in-villupuram-district-tn-minister/article68945518.ece
  9. 9. Rajagopalan V, Venkatesan G. Impact of Gaja cyclone on tree damage in Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India. J Environ Eng Crit Challenges. 2023;2(1):102. https://doi.org/10.33790/jeecc1100102
  10. 10. Das GK. Cyclonic hazards in the recent past in peninsular India. Reason Tech J. 2020:1-5. https://doi.org/10.21843/reas/2020/1-15/209270
  11. 11. Sakthivel Pandian M, Sridhar N. Nivar cyclone-related urban flood vulnerability in Velachery municipality, Chennai. Water Sci. 2024;38(1):501-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23570008.2024.2400371
  12. 12. Janakiraman A, Sudhakar MP, Ratnam K, Santhanakumar J, Jha DK, Dharani G. An impact of tropical cyclone on meiobenthic fauna of Chennai coast, Tamil Nadu, India: A case study of cyclone Mandous. Sci Total Environ. 2024;918:170657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170657
  13. 13. Silambarasan P, Vanan TT, Kumaravel N, Churchil RR, Vengadabady N, Rajkumar NV. Level of adoption of flood disaster mitigation strategies by livestock farmers during flood disaster in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu. Biol Forum Int J. 2022;14:420-24.
  14. 14. Dhanya P, Geethalakshmi V, Ramanathan S, Senthilraja K, Sreeraj P, Pradipa C, et al. Impacts and climate change adaptation of agrometeorological services among the maize farmers of west Tamil Nadu. Agriengineering. 2022;4(4):1030-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4040065
  15. 15. Venkateswarlu B, Shankar AK, Gogoi AK. Climate change adaptation and mitigation in Indian agriculture. In: Climate change adaptation strategies in agriculture and allied sectors. Scientific Publishers India. 2011:85-95.
  16. 16. Kamruzzaman M, Anne Daniell K, Chowdhury A, Crimp S. Facilitating learning for innovation in a climate-stressed context: Insights from flash flood-affected rice farming in Bangladesh. J Agric Educ Ext. 2023;29(4):463-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2082497
  17. 17. Alhassan H. Farm households' flood adaptation practices, resilience and food security in the Upper East region, Ghana. Heliyon. 2020;6(6):e04167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04167
  18. 18. Fadul E, Masih I, De Fraiture C. Adaptation strategies to cope with low, high and untimely floods: Lessons from the Gash spate irrigation system, Sudan. Agric Water Manag. 2019;217:212-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.035
  19. 19. Mallareddy M, Thirumalaikumar R, Balasubramanian P, Naseeruddin R, Nithya N, Mariadoss A, et al. Maximizing water use efficiency in rice farming: A comprehensive review of innovative irrigation management technologies. Water. 2023;15(10):1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101802
  20. 20. Anantha KH, Garg KK, Barron J, Dixit S, Venkataradha A, Singh R, et al. Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia. Agric Syst. 2021;194:103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103276
  21. 21. Bahinipati CS, Kumar V, Viswanathan PK. An evidence-based systematic review on farmers’ adaptation strategies in India. Food Secur. 2021;13(2):399-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01139-3
  22. 22. Wetende E, Olago D, Ogara W. Perceptions of climate change variability and adaptation strategies on smallholder dairy farming systems: Insights from Siaya sub-county of Western Kenya. Environ Dev. 2018;27:14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.08.001
  23. 23. Asrat P, Simane B. Farmers’ perception of climate change and adaptation strategies in the Dabus watershed, North-West Ethiopia. Ecol Process. 2018;7(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0118-8
  24. 24. Tumbo SD, Mwalukasa N, Fue KG, Mlozi MR, Haug R, Sanga C. Exploring information seeking behavior of farmers in information related to climate change adaptation through ICT (CHAI). Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2018;19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3229

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.