Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Underutilized pulses: Quality evaluation and value addition

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7901
Submitted
24 February 2025
Published
24-05-2025 — Updated on 09-06-2025
Versions

Abstract

Underutilized pulses have significant potential for enhancing food and nutritional security while contributing to agricultural development. Quality assessment and value addition are important to promote underutilized pulses in an effective way. This study evaluated the physical, cooking, nutritional and phytochemical profiles of moth bean and rice bean. The bulk density of moth bean and rice beans were found to be 892 kg/m3 and 846 kg/m3, respectively. The cooking time for unroasted moth bean was 60 min and for roasted moth bean it was nearly half the time reduced (≈35 min). Roasting of pulses had significant reduction of cooking time. Both moth bean and rice bean exhibited a favorable nutritional profile, with protein contents of 20.63 g/100g and 19.28 g/100g respectively. The fat content was less than 1 g in both pulses while fiber content was at 5.6 % for moth bean and 4.32 % for the rice bean. The phytochemicals such as phytic acid, tannins and saponins were present in both pulses. Moth bean and rice bean are highly suitable for the preparation of regular pulse based recipes and products with commercial value as well. Nutrimix prepared using underutilized pulses were highly acceptable by semi-trained panel of sensory evaluation with a shelf life of two months and is suitable for commercial production.

References

  1. 1. Brink M, Ramolemana GM, Sibuga KP. Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc. Record from Protabase. Brink, M. & Belay, G. (Eds). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/ Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2006.
  2. 2. Ganapathy S, Shibi S, Kanchanarani R, Jayakumar J, Veeramani P, Senthilkumar M, et al. Moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal] as an alternative crop to groundnut in the rainfed areas of northern parts of Tamil Nadu, India. Legume Research- An International Journal. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5415
  3. 3. Kochar SL. Mat or moth bean (Phaseolus aconitifolius) in Economic botany: A comprehensive study, 5th edition, vol.430. Ed. Kochhar. Cambridge University Press. 2016;5(5)430:167-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286098.007
  4. 4. Gupta N, Shrivastava N, Singh PK, Bhagyawant SS. Phytochemical evaluation of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia L.) seeds and their divergence. Biochem Res Int. 2016;128-33. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3136043
  5. 5. Viswanatha KP, Kumar D, Ramavtar S, Kumar D. Improvement of minor pulses and their role in alleviating malnutrition. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2016;76(4):593-607. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00075.4
  6. 6. Meena MK, Dogra I, Sudarsan Y, Sharma A K, Singh D, Sharma V, et al. Identification and characterization of CAT1 gene during drought stress in moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal]. J Agric Ecol. 2022;14:164–72. https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2214-224
  7. 7. Tiwari AK, Shivhare AK,Vipin K. Moth bean production technology. Directorate of Pulses Development, Government of India, Department of Agriculture Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Vindhyachal Bhavan, Bhopal. 2017.
  8. 8. Magan S, Rundan V, Santose O. Ricebean: High valued fodder crop. Indian Farming. 2020;70 (06):27–31.
  9. 9. Rani J, Sanju BD, Joyce K, Kashif MK, Amit S. A narrative review on nutritional and health benefits of underutilized summer crop to address agriculture challenges: Moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia L.). Legum Sci. 2023;5(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.204
  10. 10. Mathur M, Kumari, A, Grewal R. Physical and functional properties of different cereals, pulses, millet and oil seeds. J AgriSearch. 2020;7(2):97-103. https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v6i02.18105
  11. 11. Wani IA, Sogi DS, Wani AA, Gill BS. Physical and cooking characteristics of some Indian kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.12.002
  12. 12. Sharma P, Gujral HS. Milling behavior of hulled barley and its thermal and pasting properties. J Food Eng. 2010;97:329–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.10.025
  13. 13. Mohsenin NN. Physical properties of plants and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science publishers, N W, New York. 1980. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003062325
  14. 14. Hamid S, Muzaffar S, Wani IA, Masoodi FA, Bhat MM. Physical and cooking characteristics of two cowpea cultivars grown in temperate Indian climate. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2016;15 (2):127-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.08.002
  15. 15. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. McGraw-Hill Education – Europe. 2014. ISBN: 9780074518519.
  16. 16. Sadasivam S, Manickam. A. Biochemical methods. New Age International Publishers. 2015.
  17. 17. Obadoni BO, Ochuko PO. Phytochemical studies and comparative efficacy of the crude extracts of some homeostatic plants in Edo and Delta states of Nigeria. GJPAS. 2001;8:203-08. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v8i2.16033
  18. 18. Sahay KM, Singh KK. Unit operations of agricultural processing. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. 1996. ISBN: 9780706980172.
  19. 19. Pandiselvam R, Thirupathi V, Kothakota A, Kamalapreetha B. Important engineering properties of green gram (Vigna radiata). Agricultural Engineering Today. 2017;41(4):30-06.
  20. 20. Jayas D, Cenkowski S. 24 Grain property values and their measurement. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420017618.ch24
  21. 21. Huma N, Anjum FM, Sehar S, Khan MI, Hussain S. Effect of soaking and cooking on nutritional quality and safety of legumes. Nutrition & Food Science. 2008;38(6):570-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346650810920187
  22. 22. Wood JA. Evaluation of cooking time in pulses: A review. Cereal Chem. 2017;94(1):32–48. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-05-16-0127-FI
  23. 23. JacintoHC, AzpirozRS, AcostaGJA, HernandezSH, BernalLI. Genetic analysis and random amplified polymorphic DNA markers associated with cooking time in common bean. Crop Sci. 2003;43:329-32. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0329
  24. 24. Katoch R, Sanadya SK, Pathania K, Chaudhary HK. Nutritional and nutraceutical potential of rice bean (Vigna umbellata)–a legume with hidden potential. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2023;10:1126544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1126544
  25. 25. Gopalan C, Rama SV, Balasubramanian SC. Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR, Hyderabad, 2014.
  26. 26. Yang Y, Ling W. Health benefits and future research of phytochemicals: A literature review. J Nutr. 2025;155(1):87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.11.007
  27. 27. Deshmukh BA, Pawar VS. Effects of different pretreatments on physicochemical and anti-nutritional quality of moth bean. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(1):1965-68. E-ISSN: 2278-4136
  28. 28. Moth Bean Dhal Puff. Central Food Technology Research Institute, Mysore - 570 020. https://cftri.res.in/kweb/technologies/CP/mbd.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.