Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Turmeric planting methods and mechanization strategies: A review towards the development of a fully automatic planter

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7956
Submitted
27 February 2025
Published
14-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

Turmeric (Curcuma longa), a major crop in India accounting for 80 % of global production, faces challenges such as pest infestations, diseases, climate change and economic volatility, necessitating precision agriculture strategies to enhance sustainability. Planting is a critical determinant of crop yield and quality; however, conventional manual methods remain labor-intensive and inefficient, underscoring the need for mechanization. Mechanical turmeric planters have been shown to decrease the cost and time associated with planting by 59.52% and 96.57 %, respectively. This review examines key turmeric planting methods, including flat-bed, ridge-and-furrow and raised-bed systems, while analyzing the engineering properties of turmeric rhizomes relevant to planter design. It has been found that ridge planting has produced 86.78 q ha-1 of yield compared to flat-bed planting of 67.26 q ha-1 and raised bed planting significantly reduced disease incidence, with only 9.6 % leaf spot and no rhizome rot observed, compared to 22.5 % leaf spot using the flat bed method. The evolution of planting technology from manual to semi-automatic and fully automatic systems is discussed, along with a critical assessment of metering mechanisms such as vertical rotating discs, multistage rotating cups and auger conveyors. The influence of furrow opener design and operational parameters, including planting speed and accuracy, on field performance was also reviewed. By identifying research gaps related to the impact of rhizome properties on planter efficiency, this study concludes that optimized automatic planters tailored to turmeric’s specific agronomic requirements can enhance planting precision, improve productivity and contribute to sustainable cultivation practices.

References

  1. 1. Jain S, Meena S, Kumar S, Amin PU. Overview of turmeric industry and market in India. J Spices Aromat Crops. 2021;30(1):1-10.
  2. 2. Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India. National Turmeric Board to increase awareness and consumption of turmeric and develop new markets internationally to increase exports. Press Inf Bureau. 2023.
  3. 3. Patare SD, Pokharkar VG, Shinde VA. Growth and instability in area, production and productivity of turmeric in Maharashtra. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(8):2090–92.
  4. 4. Spices Board India. Major spice state-wise area production (2022-23). 2022.
  5. 5. Sravani S, Prasad SV, Praveena PLRJ. Problems encountered by the turmeric farmers and suggestions to overcome the problems in marketing the produce in Kadapa district of Andhra Pradesh. Biol Forum Int J. 2023;15(5):225–29.
  6. 6. Kumar P, Singh R, Lal SK. Impact of climate change on crop yield and role of model for achieving food security. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191(8):476-86.
  7. 7. Raj D, Kumar M, Saha S. Market trends and economic issues for turmeric in the Indian context. Econ Aff. 2018;63(4):759-65.
  8. 8. Viraja CV, Thumar VM, Tandel VB. Cost structure and profitability of turmeric cultivation in Navsari district of South Gujarat. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2018;6(5):1486-88.
  9. 9. Srivastava SK, Singh J, Kumar NR, Singh NP, Ahmad N. Changing agricultural labour market and its effects on farm economy in India. Indian J Agric Econ. 2020;75(4):469-80. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.345141
  10. 10. Zend JP, Revanwar MS, Gaikwad SS. Gender participation and technology use in turmeric production system. Curr Agric Res J. 2019;7(2):165-70. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.2.04
  11. 11. Cambouris A, Zebarth B, Ziadi N, Perron I. Precision agriculture in potato production. Potato Res. 2014;57:249-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9266-0
  12. 12. McKinion JM, Jenkins J, Akins D, Turner S, Willers J, Jallas E, Whisler FD. Analysis of a precision agriculture approach to cotton production. Comput Electron Agric. 2001;32:213-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(01)00166-1
  13. 13. Yost M, Kitchen N, Sudduth K, Sadler E, Drummond S, Volkmann MR. Long-term impact of a precision agriculture system on grain crop production. Precis Agric. 2017;18:823-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9490-5
  14. 14. Zhao G, Miao Y, Wang H, Su M, Fan M, Zhang F, et al. A preliminary precision rice management system for increasing both grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Field Crops Res. 2013; 154:23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.07.019
  15. 15. Muogbo C, Gbabo A, Nwakuba N. Field performance analysis of a tractor-drawn turmeric rhizome planter. Poljopr Teh. 2019; 44(3):33-46. https://doi.org/10.5937/PoljTeh1902033M
  16. 16. Leva RL, Thanki JD, Patel DD, Patel TU. Effect of different planting methods and levels of fertigation on turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Bioinfolet - Q J Life Sci. 2013;10:811-13.
  17. 17. Kumar M, Gill BS. Effect of method of planting and harvesting time on growth, yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). J Spices Aromat Crops. 2011;18:22–27.
  18. 18. Gill BS, Kaur S, Saini SS. Influence of planting methods, spacing and farmyard manure on growth, yield and nutrient content of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). J Spices Aromat Crops. 2004;13(2):117-120.
  19. 19. Bhadouria RS, Singh TK, Singh J, Haldar A. Effect of various planting methods on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Plant Arch. 2013;13(2):1093-95.
  20. 20. Parkash O, Brar AS. Effect of planting methods and plant population on growth, yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Indian J Ecol. 2015;42(2):490-92.
  21. 21. Rambabu E, Sunil Kumar M, Malathi S, Kishore Kumar N, Ramulamma A, Kranthi Kumar B. Front line demonstration of turmeric cultivation on raised bed with drip system in Telangana. Biol Forum-Int J. 2022;14(1):1483-86.
  22. 22. Prasadji JK, Rao DM, Murthy KK, Pandu S, Muralidharan K. Effect of cultural practices on leaf blotch severity and yield in turmeric. Indian J Plant Prot. 2002;30:115-19.
  23. 23. Roshan RK, Pebam N, Kolom R, Sarawasat PK. Single bud transplanting technique of turmeric to reduce production cost. Int J Agric Sci. 2022;18:33–7. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/18-CIABASSD/33-37
  24. 24. Ardeshna RB, Arvadia MK, Patil RG, Savani NG. Effect of land configuration and soil conditioners on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Indian J Agron. 2013; 58(3):412-15. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i3.4209
  25. 25. Anitha B, Padma M, Natrajan S, Narayana DL, Sujatha M, Mahender. Evaluation of turmeric variety Selam with different types of planting material and sowing methods on growth and yield of turmeric. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(7):1337-40.
  26. 26. Padmadevi K, Jeeva Jothi L, Ponnuswami V, Durgavathi V, Rijwana Parveen I. Effect of different grades of rhizomes on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Asian J Hortic. 2012;7(2):465-67.
  27. 27. Temteme S, Getachew E, Mekonnen B, Shimber T. Influence of type of planting material, plant density and method of planting on the yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma domestica L.) at Tepi Southwestern Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Technol. 2017;5(5):305. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000305
  28. 28. Yang SK, Shin GH, Park SY, Kim HJ, Seo YW, Seo JB, et al. Effects of planting density on the growth and yield of organically turmeric cultivation in upland and paddy soil. Trends Agric Life Sci. 2016;53:12-21. https://doi.org/10.29335/tals.2016.53.1
  29. 29. Balasubramanian S, Mohite AM, Singh KK, Zachariah TJ, Anand T. Physical properties of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). J Spices Aromat Crops. 2012;21(2):178-81.
  30. 30. Thul PP, Shirsat BS, Sawant AA. Studies on engineering properties of fresh turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) rhizomes. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(9):2587-90.
  31. 31. Parmar R, Dabhi MN. Physical properties of fresh turmeric rhizomes (Var. Salem). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2022;15(Special Issue):369-77. doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.03.2022.11
  32. 32. Farzana W, Niruba PP, Adeyemi AE. Physical properties of raw PTS 10 turmeric variety. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;1:782-86.
  33. 33. Dhineshkumar V, Anandakumar S. Physical and engineering properties of turmeric rhizome. South Asian J Food Technol Environ. 2016;2(1):304-08. https://doi.org/10.46370/sajfte.2016.v02i01.03
  34. 34. Venkat R, Reddy KVSR, Kumar AA, Babu RG, Rao CS. Investigation of physical properties of turmeric rhizomes about to design a metering mechanism for turmeric planting. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2023;42(43):45-52. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i434277
  35. 35. de Ramos JD, Santiago MR, Barreto RP, Talaro NMG, Cullat JR. Determination of the physical and mechanical properties of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Philipp J Agric Biosyst Eng. 2021;17(1):27-38. https://doi.org/10.48196/017.01.2021.03
  36. 36. Singh A, Kaur S. Evaluation of different methods of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) plantation. Int J Agric Sci. 2015;11(1):201-03. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/11.1/201-203
  37. 37. Kambale GV, Munde PA, and Solanki SN. Performance and evaluation of VNMKV, UAE developed bullock drawn turmeric planter. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(1):131-36. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2023.v12.i1b.18335
  38. 38. Swamy R, Jayaprakash R, Sridhar M, Kumar SN, Naaiik RB. Performance evaluation of tractor drawn 2-row raised bed turmeric semi-automatic planter. Pharma Innov J. 2023;SP-12(10):1783-86.
  39. 39. Mahesh BT. Sensor-based tractor drawn ginger planter. Farm Mach Power Eng. Doctoral [thesis]. Tavanur, India: Kerala Agriculture University; 2020.
  40. 40. Ahuja S, Bhatia B. Usage and field performance of automatic - potato planters in India. Agric Eng Today. 2002;26:7-16.
  41. 41. Pandey HS, Sawant CP. Design and development of a seed metering mechanism for ginger planter. J Sci Ind Res. 2023;82(10):1071-80. https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v82i10.225
  42. 42. Liu HX, Guo LF, Fu LL, Tang SF. Study on multi-size seed-metering device for vertical plate soybean precision planter. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2015;8(1):1-8.
  43. 43. El-Yamani AE. A new metering system for potato tubers planter. Egypt. J Agric Res. 2012; 90(2):777-95. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2012.161202
  44. 44. Nandede BM, Raheman H. Multi-stage metering mechanism for transplanting of vegetable seedlings in paper pots. J Inst Eng India Ser A. 2015;96(4):295-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-015-0130-2
  45. 45. Chilur R, Nandede BM, Tiwari PS. Development of an auger conveyor type metering device for transplanting of vegetable seedlings raised in paper pots. Trop Agric Res. 2018; 29(4):258-70. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v29i4.8253
  46. 46. Anandakumar TM, Singh TP, Chandrashekar. Development and laboratory evaluation of picker wheel type metering mechanism for tuberose and gladiolus corms. J Sci Ind Res. 2022;81:13-20. https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v81i01.55442
  47. 47. Kang N, Xianfa F, Yangchun L, Chengxu L, Yanwei Y. Design optimization and performance evaluation of an electric cup-chain potato metering device. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2017;10(2):36-43.
  48. 48. Buitenwerf H, Hoogmoed WB, Lerink P, Müller J. Assessment of the behaviour of potatoes in a cup-belt planter. Biosyst Eng. 2006;95(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.06.007
  49. 49. Boydaş MG. Effect of cup size, seed characteristics and angular speed on the performance of an automatic potato planter under laboratory conditions. Tarim Bilim Derg. 2017; 23(3):317-27. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.447634
  50. 50. Wang F, Sun K, Lai Q, Dong J, Su W, Yu Q. Design and test of single-row air-suction micro-tuber precision seeder. J Agric Mach. 2020;51(1):66-75. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7598164
  51. 51. Troger H, Reis AV, Machado A, Machado RLT. Analyzing the efforts in furrow openers used in low power planters. Eng Agricola. 2013;32(6):1133-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162012000600015
  52. 52. Darmora DP, Pandey KP. Evaluation of performance of furrow openers of combined seed and fertiliser drills. Soil Tillage Res. 1995;34(2):127-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(94)00452-K
  53. 53. Ahmad F, Weimin D, Qishou D, Rehim A, Jabran K. Comparative performance of various disc-type furrow openers in no-till paddy field conditions. Sustainability. 2017;9(7):1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071143
  54. 54. McLaughlin N, Campbell A, Owen G. Performance of hoe and triple disc furrow openers on no-till grain drills in a fine sandy loam soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2019;195:104373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104373
  55. 55. Darmora DP, Pandey KP. Performance evaluation of shovel type furrow opener of a seed cum fertilizer drill in sandy soils. J Agric Eng. 2006;43(1):74-7. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2006431.1163
  56. 56. Kurhade A, Sharma A, Mathur R. Effect of tool parameters on performance of soil disruption by shoe type furrow openers for animal drawn seed drill in sandy loam soil. J Agric Eng. 2010;47:1-7. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2010473.1412
  57. 57. Aikins KA, Barr JB, Ucgul M, Jensen TA, Antille DL, Desbiolles JMA. No-tillage furrow opener performance: A review of tool geometry, settings and interactions with soil and crop residue. Soil Res. 2020;58(7):603-21. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR19153
  58. 58. Gbabo A, Muogbo CP, Gana IM. Development of a tractor drawn turmeric planter. Asian J Agric Food Sci. 2020;8(4):92-7. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajafs.v8i4.6286
  59. 59. Kumar M, Bariha A. Development of tractor operated semi-automatic two row turmeric planter. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(2):1057-60.
  60. 60. Vasuki G. Design and development of a tractor-operated turmeric planter. Farm Mach Power Eng. Master’s [thesis]. Coimbatore, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2012.
  61. 61. Ding YQ, Yang L, Zhang DX, Cui T, Li YH, Zhong XJ. Novel low-cost control system for large high-speed corn precision planters. Int J Agric & Biol Eng. 2021;14(2):151–58. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211402.6053
  62. 62. Srinivasan N, Prabhu P, Smruthi SS, Sivaraman NV, Gladwin SJ, Rajavel R, et al. Design of an autonomous seed planting robot. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC); 2016 Dec 21–23; Agra, India. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2016. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC.2016.7906789
  63. 63. Pareek CM, Tewari VK, Nare B. A mechatronic seed metering control system for improving sowing uniformity of planters. J Eng Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.041

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.