Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025)

Investigation of wine fermentation from dual mango (Mangifera indica) and jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) mash

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8751
Submitted
8 April 2025
Published
08-11-2025 — Updated on 21-11-2025
Versions

Abstract

Jackfruit and mango fruit have a distinctive aromatic flavour and a delicious taste with numerous bioactive components useful for human health. They are highly perishable at ambient conditions after harvesting. It was essential to convert these good food supplies into value-added products like wine. The main objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of material replacement ratios (6 %-18 %) of jackfruit to mango mash, initial pH (4.0-4.8), initial total dry matter (16-32 oBx), yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculation ratios (0.8-1.6 g/L) to wine quality basing on the alcoholic content (%), acidity (%), total dry matter (%) and overall acceptance (sensory score). The wine fermentation process was performed in 10 days. Results showed that the best wine quality would be obtained with alcoholic content (1.891 ± 0.002  %), acidity (1.446 ± 0.001  %), total dry matter (0.363 ± 0.003  %) and overall acceptance (8.60 ± 0.01 sensory score) by the jackfruit/mango incorporation of 12 %, initial pH 4.4, initial total dry matter 24 oBx, yeast ratio 1.4 g/L. Jackfruit incorporated with mango created a pleasant flavour wine. Mango blended with jackfruit for wine making could be considered an intelligent strategy to exploit and alter the abundant source into a valuable product. This research opened a wide opportunity to diversify fruit wine from different valuable crops.

References

  1. 1. Baskar M, Hemalatha G, Muneeshwari P. Fermentation of wine from tropical and subtropical fruits: A review. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(5):118–26. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5b.10287
  2. 2. Pinchu ET, Biju D. Value added products from jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) fruit. Acta Sci Nutr Health. 2020;4(2):105–10.
  3. 3. Musyimi SM, Sila DN, Okoth EM, Onyango CA, Mathooko FM. The influence of process optimization on the fermentation profile of mango wine prepared from the Apple mango variety. J Animal Plant Sci. 2013;17(3):2600–07.
  4. 4. Reddy LVA, Reddy OVS. Production and optimization and characterization of wine from mango (Mangifera indica Linn.). Nat Prod Radiance. 2009;8(4):426–35.
  5. 5. Reddy LVA, Reddy OVS. Effect of fermentation conditions on yeast growth and volatile composition of wine produced from mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit juice. Food Bio Process. 2011;89:487–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.11.007
  6. 6. Varakumar S, Naresh K, Reddy OVS. Preparation of mango (Mangifera indica L.) wine using a new yeast-mango-peel immobilised biocatalyst system. Czech J Food Sci. 2012;30:557–66. https://doi.org/10.17221/478/2011-CJFS
  7. 7. Ankita SA, Pawar CD, Salvi BR, Salvi VG, Borkar PG. Changes in chemical composition of raw mango wine. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2024;13(4):215–25. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2024.1304.024
  8. 8. Kumoro AC, Sari DR, Pinandita APP. Preparation of wine from jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam) juice using baker yeast: Effect of yeast and initial sugar concentrations. World Appl Sci J. 2012;16(9):1262–68.
  9. 9. Sharma N, Bhutia SP, Aradhya D. Process optimization for fermentation of wine from jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.). J Food Process Technol. 2013;4(2):1–5.
  10. 10. Shraddha AJ, Munishamanna KB, Shyamalamma S. Microbial fermentation of blended jackfruit juice for quality improvement of jackfruit wine. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2021;55(3):83–90.
  11. 11. Galande A, Pawar CD, Khanvilkar MH, Kadam JJ, Sawant P. Studies on jackfruit and kokum blended wine during storage. Pharma Innovation J. 2023;SP-12(12):139–45. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2023.v12.i12a.24471
  12. 12. Krivorotova T, Sereikaite J. Determination of fructanexohydrolase activity in the crude extracts of plants. Electron J Biotechnol. 2014;17(6):329–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.005
  13. 13. Hien TT, Khang VC, Muoi NV, Truc TT. Production of a fermented beverage from pineapple (Ananas comosus) byproduct crumbs. Mater Today Proc. 2022;60(3):2034–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.270
  14. 14. Adebanke BM, Adunni AO, Lola KF, Monday OK, Olufunke E, Olushola R. Physicochemical and sensory properties of blends of pineapple-carrot wine. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2017;7(3):306–11. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2017/18.7.3.306-311
  15. 15. Panyawoot N, So S, Cherdthong A, Chanjula P. Effect of feeding discarded durian peel ensiled with Lactobacillus casei th14 and additives in total mixed rations on digestibility, ruminal fermentation, methane mitigation and nitrogen balance of Thai native–Anglo-Nubian goats. Fermentation. 2022;8(2):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020043
  16. 16. Inshad IA, Rony A, Abdur R. Characterization of fruits of eleven accessions of jackfruit. Int J Chem Stud. 2022;10(2):04–10. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2022.v10.i2a.12171
  17. 17. Dhumal AD, Swami SB. Physicochemical properties of Alphonso mango pulp. Int J Food Ferment Technol. 2022;12(01):19–24. https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-9396.01.2022.3
  18. 18. Ogodo AC, Ugbogu OC, Ugbogu AE, Ezeonu CS. Production of mixed fruit (pawpaw, banana and watermelon) wine using Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from palm wine. Springerplus. 2015;4:683. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1475-8
  19. 19. Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(2):300–72. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.2.300-372.2002
  20. 20. Ogodo AC, Ugbogu OC, Agwaranze DI, Ezeonu NG. Production and evaluation of fruit wine from Mangifera indica (cv. Peter). Appli Microbiol Open Access. 2018;4:144.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.