Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Comparative efficacy of different inoculation methods in screening sugarcane varieties for resistance to Fusarium sacchari

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9547
Submitted
26 May 2025
Published
04-12-2025

Abstract

Fusarium sacchari, the causal organism of sugarcane wilt, is a major constraint to sugarcane yield in India and other countries. Unlike several other fungal diseases of sugarcane, attempts to artificially induce this disease have limited success. To address this gap, field studies were conducted at the Sugarcane Research Farm in Kalyanpur (RPCAU, Pusa, Samastipur) during the 2023-24 cropping season to simulate wilt under field conditions using thirty-five sugarcane varieties along with a highly susceptible check variety (CoV 92102). All varieties were assessed for their responses to the wilt pathogen using 0 - 4 scale of wilt severity index. Among various inoculation methods, the plug method proved to be the most effective, as it clearly differentiated resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible and susceptible varieties with balanced distribution across all categories. It recorded 20 % resistant, 28.58 % moderately resistant, 37.14 % moderately susceptible and 14.29 % susceptible varieties, thereby providing a realistic assessment of varietal response. In comparison, the soil and sett dip methods showed higher proportions of resistant and moderately resistant categories but fewer susceptible varieties, while the cotton swab method largely favoured resistance (94.29 %), masking the true susceptibility of many varieties. Hence, the Plug method is considered the best and most reliable technique for evaluating sugarcane resistance against wilt disease because it exposes pathogenic variability more effectively and avoids overestimation of resistance.

References

  1. 1. Menossi M, Silva-Filho MC, Vincentz M, Van-Sluys MA, Souza GM. Sugarcane functional genomics: Gene discovery for agronomic trait development. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;458732. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/458732
  2. 2. Croft BJ, Magarey RC, Allsopp PG, Cox MC, Willcox TG, Milford BJ, et al. Sugarcane smut in Queensland: Arrival and emergency response. Australas Plant Pathol. 2008;37(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP07083
  3. 3. Priya SR, Vajpayi PK, Suresh PK. Stochastic models for sugarcane yield forecasting. Indian J Sugarcane Technol. 2015;30:1–5.
  4. 4. Minhas A. Consumer goods & FMCG, Food & Nutrition. 2024. Available from: https://www.statista.com
  5. 5. ISMA. Indian Sugar Mills Association, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India. ON3481 & Past Issues. 2024.
  6. 6. Rao GP, Viswanathan R, Singh SB. Current situation of sugarcane diseases in India. In: Singh SB, Rao GP, Eswaramoorthy S, editors. Sugarcane crop management. SciTech Publishing LLC; 2002. p. 7–34.
  7. 7. Rott P, Bailey RA, Comstock JC, Croft BJ, Saumtally S. A guide to sugarcane diseases. CIRAD-ISSCT; 2000.
  8. 8. Minnatullah Md, Singh P, Singh SP, Aaradhna. Sugarcane disease scenario, possible reasons for their spread and suitable remedies in Bihar condition. Plant Pathol. 2022;11(6):655–9.
  9. 9. Viswanathan R. Status of sugarcane wilt: One hundred years after its occurrence in India. J Sugarcane Res. 2013;3(2):86–106.
  10. 10. Aaradhna, Minnatullah Md. Assessment of varietal response and its impacts on different cane attributes due to sugarcane wilt caused by Fusarium sacchari. J Krishi Vigyan. 2024;12(1):5–14.
  11. 11. Mohanraj D, Alexander KC. A qualitative numerical index for rating severity in sugarcane wilt. Indian Sugar Crops J. 1984;10:19–20.
  12. 12. Viswanathan R. Sugarcane diseases and their management. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute; 2012.
  13. 13. Chhabra ML, Pandey SK, Parameswari B. Standardization of methodology for in vivo evaluation of sugarcane clones against wilt. Indian Phytopathol. 2016;69(4s):694–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-016-0043-0
  14. 14. Viswanathan R, Poongothai M, Malathi P. Pathogenic and molecular confirmation of Fusarium sacchari causing wilt in sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 2011;13(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0056-4
  15. 15. Paul SK, Mahmud NU, Gupta DR, Alam MN, Chakraborty M, Islam MT. First report of Fusarium sacchari causing sugarcane wilt in Bangladesh. Plant Dis. 2022;106:319. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-21-0681-PDN
  16. 16. Viswanathan R, Poongothai M, Malathi P, Naveen Prasanth C. Sugarcane wilt: Simulation of pathogenicity through different methods and environments. Int Sugar J. 2015;194:20.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.