Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Assessing the impact of AI on the academic learning of agricultural students

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10001
Submitted
11 June 2025
Published
21-08-2025 — Updated on 16-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) are transforming agricultural science education by enhancing students' critical thinking, creativity and decision-making skills. However, concerns exist regarding over-reliance and diminished independent analytical thinking. This study investigated the impact of GPT usage among undergraduate and postgraduate students at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. A structured questionnaire was employed to collect primary data from 164 students (122 GPT users and 42 non-users). The research adopts a descriptive design and utilizes statistical tools such as percentage analysis, Garrett ranking, Relative Importance Index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis to assess the influence of GPTs on cognitive skills. The findings indicate that the GPTs enhance efficiency, creativity and problem-solving, they additionally possess the risk of overreliance, reducing independent analytical thinking. Factor analysis revealed key dimensions, including decision-making enhancement, overreliance on AI and the impact on problem solving of agricultural science students. The study concludes that balanced AI integration is essential for maximizing GPT's advantages while minimizing dependency. Agricultural institutions should promote critical engagement strategies to ensure responsible AI use and foster an optimal AI-human synergy in the academic learning process of agricultural students.

References

  1. 1. Zou M, Huang L. To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
  2. 2. Shanto SS, Ahmed Z, Jony AI. Enriching learning process with generative AI: a proposed framework to cultivate critical thinking in higher education using ChatGPT. Tuijin Jishu. 2024;45(1):3019–29. http://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v45.i01.4680
  3. 3. Kasneci E, Seßler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn Individ Differ. 2023;103:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  4. 4. Lund BD, Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Libr Hi Tech News. 2023;40(3):26–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2022-0554
  5. 5. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar AK, et al. Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manag. 2023;71:102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  6. 6. Pawar PP, Salve KB, Patil RR. Impact of ChatGPT on student’s education: a comprehensive analysis of positive and negative effects. J Adv Zool. 2023;44(8):55–62. http://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44iS8.3504
  7. 7. Fu Y. A research of the impact of ChatGPT on education. Appl Comput Eng. 2024;35(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/35/20230354
  8. 8. Guo Y, Lee D. Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. J Chem Educ. 2023;100(12):4876–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
  9. 9. Ammar A. The impact of ChatGPT on student’s behavior in UAE. Int J Theory Organ Pract. 2024;4(1):1–9.
  10. 10. Essel HB, Vlachopoulos D, Essuman AB, Amankwa JO. ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2024;6:100198. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198
  11. 11. Barton H, Thrun S. Future learning and cognitive skills: the impact of ChatGPT and AI tools on education. 2024. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22228.62084
  12. 12. Saxena D, Khandare S, Chaudhary S. An overview of ChatGPT: impact on academic learning. FMDB Trans Sustain Tech Learn. 2023;1(1):11–20.
  13. 13. El-Seoud A, Samir M, Ayman SE, Nagaty KA, Karam OH. The impact of ChatGPT on student learning/performing. 2023. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4532913
  14. 14. Harahap DS. Implementation of ChatGPT to improve students' critical thinking abilities. Indones J Educ Soc Humanit. 2024;1(2):33–9. https://doi.org/10.62945/ijesh.v1i2.58
  15. 15. Liu Q, Zhou Y, Huang J, Li G. When ChatGPT is gone: creativity reverts and homogeneity persists. arXiv [Preprint]. 2024. arXiv:2401.06816.
  16. 16. Paul R, Elder L. Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Boston: Pearson Education; 2019.
  17. 17. Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Obradovich N, Bongard J, Bonnefon JF, Breazeal C, et al. Machine behaviour. Nature. 2019;568(7753):477–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y
  18. 18. Shin D, Zhong B, Biocca F. AI as an active agent: how artificial intelligence is reshaping human decision-making. Comput Human Behav. 2022;129:107148.
  19. 19. Müller VC, Bostrom N. Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion. In: Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. 2016:555–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_33
  20. 20. Zhang W, Patel H. Problem-solving and AI: understanding the effects of AI-assisted learning on student performance. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;36(1):120–35.
  21. 21. Liu X, Smith J, Patel R. AI in education: benefits and challenges of decision-making support. J Educ Technol. 2024;41(2):85–102.
  22. 22. Sandhaus P, Kim L, Rivera D. The impact of AI tools on student creativity and cognitive engagement. AI Soc. 2024;39(1):55–73.
  23. 23. Jones M, Brown K. The cognitive consequences of AI reliance in analytical tasks. Learn Instr. 2024;55:22–38.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.