Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Evaluation of agronomic traits of cotton RIL population and its parental genotypes in water deficiency environment

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10120
Submitted
18 June 2025
Published
26-11-2025

Abstract

In recent years, global climate change has led to rising temperatures and droughts, which have had a negative impact on agricultural crops. Therefore, the development of new varieties of agricultural crops, including cotton, with increased resistance to abiotic stress and improved productivity remains extremely relevant using modern breeding and molecular genetic programs. In this context, it is crucial to select the initial breeding genotypes with high resistance to water stress and productivity. In this study, 100 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of cotton (Gossypium hirsitum L.) from the F11 population (Namangan-77 × Zangi-ota), developed by crossing the recipient cotton variety Namangan-77 with the donor variety Zangi-ota, were grown under two different conditions (water stress and optimal). Their agronomic parameters, such as seed cotton weight per boll, 1000-seed weight, fiber staple length and fiber yield, were studied. As a result of the research, it was established that 30 families of the RIL population under conditions of water deficiency showed improved indicators compared to the recipient variety Namangan-77: the seed cotton weight per boll increased by 22 %, the weight of 1000 seeds by 33 %, the fiber staple length by 4.2 % and the fiber yield by 4.4 %. Promising breeding lines from these 30 families, possessing breeding potential, were presented to the State Variety Testing Center as new drought-tolerant candidate varieties. In addition, these families, which showed high agronomic performance under drought conditions, were recommended as donors for future breeding programs and molecular genetic studies.

References

  1. 1. Noreen S, Ashraf M, Hussain M, Perveen S, Ahmad R. Abiotic stresses mediated changes in morphophysiology of cotton plant. In: Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M, editors. Cotton production and uses. Singapore: Springer; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_18
  2. 2. Normamatov IS, Makamov AK, Boykobilov UA, Achilov SG, Khusenov NN, Norbekov JK, et al. Morpho-biological traits of upland cotton at the germination stage under optimal and salinity soil conditions. Asian J Plant Sci. 2023;22:165-72. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2023.165.172
  3. 3. Zahoor R, Dong H, Abid M, Zhao W, Wang Y, Zhou Z. Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;137:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.002
  4. 4. Zahoor R, Zhao W, Abid M, Dong H, Zhou Z. Potassium application regulates nitrogen metabolism and osmotic adjustment in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) functional leaf under drought stress. J Plant Physiol. 2017;215:30-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.001
  5. 5. Liu Y, Snider JL, Bhattarai A, Collins G. Economic penalties associated with irrigation during high rainfall years in the southeastern United States. Agric Water Manag. 2022;272:107825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107825
  6. 6. Constable GA, Bange MP. The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res. 2015;182:98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.017
  7. 7. Pilon C, Snider JL, Sobolev V, Chastain DR, Sorensen RB, Meeks CD, et al. Assessing stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation under progressive drought in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Plant Physiol. 2018;231:124-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.09.007
  8. 8. Abdelraheem A, Adams N, Zhang J. Effects of drought on agronomic and fiber quality in an introgressed backcross inbred line population of upland cotton under field conditions. Field Crops Res. 2020;254:107850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107850
  9. 9. Bibi AC, Oosterhuis DM, Gonias ED. Exogenous application of putrescine ameliorates the effect of high temperature in Gossypium hirsutum L. flowers and fruit development. J Agron Crop Sci. 2010;196:205-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00414.x
  10. 10. Wiggins MS, Leib BG, Mueller TC, Main CL. Investigation of physiological growth, fiber quality, yield and yield stability of upland cotton varieties in differing environments. J Cotton Sci. 2013;17:140-8.
  11. 11. Sarwar MKS, Ashraf MY, Rehman M, Zafar Y. Genetic variability in different biochemical traits and their relationship with yield and parameters of cotton cultivar grown under water stress conditions. Pak J Bot. 2012;44:515-20.
  12. 12. Abdulraheem MI, Xiong Y, Moshood AY, Cadenas-Pliego G, Zhang H, Hu J. Mechanisms of plant epigenetic regulation in response to plant stress: Recent discoveries and implications. Plants (Basel). 2024;13(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020163
  13. 13. Soomroo MH, Markhand GS, Soomro BA. Screening Pakistani cotton for drought tolerance. Pak J Bot. 2011;44:383-8.
  14. 14. Kramer DM, Evans JR. The importance of energy balance in improving photosynthetic productivity. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:70-8. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.166652
  15. 15. Zhang YL, Zhang HZ, Du MW, Li W, Luo HH, Chow WS, Zhang WF. Leaf wilting movement can protect water-stressed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants against photoinhibition of photosynthesis and maintain carbon assimilation in the field. J Plant Biol. 2010;53:52-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-009-9085-z
  16. 16. Huseynova IM, Rustamova SM, Suleymanov SY, Aliyeva DR, Mammadov AC, Aliyev JA. Drought-induced changes in photosynthetic apparatus and antioxidant components of wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) varieties. Photosynth Res. 2016;130(1-3):215-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-016-0244-z
  17. 17. Zahid Z, Khan MKR, Hameed A, Akhtar M, Ditta A, Hassan HM, et al. Dissection of drought tolerance in upland cotton through morpho-physiological and biochemical traits at seedling stage. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:627107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.627107
  18. 18. Viot CR, Wendel JF. Evolution of the cotton genus, Gossypium and its domestication in the Americas. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2023;42:1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2022.2156061
  19. 19. Shani MY, Ashraf MY, Ramzan M, Khan Z, Batool N, Gul N, et al. Unveiling drought tolerant cotton genotypes: Insights from morpho-physiological and biochemical markers at flowering. Plants. 2025;14:616. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040616
  20. 20. Conaty WC, Broughton KJ, Egan LM, Li X, Li Z, Liu S, et al. Cotton breeding in Australia: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:904131. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.904131
  21. 21. Steiner FA, Wild AJ, Tyborski N, Tung SY, Koehler T, Buegger F, et al. Rhizosheath drought responsiveness is variety-specific and a key component of belowground plant adaptation. New Phytol. 2024;242(2):479-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.19638
  22. 22. Uzair M, Ali M, Fiaz S, Attia K, Khan N, Al-Doss AA, et al. The characterization of wheat genotypes for salinity tolerance using morpho-physiological indices under hydroponic conditions. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(6):103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103299
  23. 23. Kushanov FN, Turaev OS, Ernazarova DK, Gapparov BM, Oripova BB, Darmanov MM, et al. Development of superior fibre quality upland cotton cultivar series ‘Ravnaq’ using marker-assisted selection. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:906472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.906472
  24. 24. Li J, Liu S, Liu R, Ma H, Shen Q, Zhang S, et al. Drought resistance cotton genotypes evaluation with multi-year and multi-site study. Agric Water Manag. 2025;316:109523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109523
  25. 25. Shavkiev J, Azimov A, Khamdullaev S, Karimov H, Abdurasulov F, Nurmetov K. Morpho-physiological and yield-contributing traits of cotton varieties with different tolerance to water deficit. J Wildl Biodivers. 2023;7(4):214-29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7783044
  26. 26. Makamov A, Shavkiev J, Kholmuradova M, Boyqobilov U, Normamatov I, Norbekov J, et al. Cotton genotypes appraisal for morpho-physiological and yield contributing traits under optimal and deficit irrigated conditions. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2023;55(1):74-89. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2023.55.1.7
  27. 27. Darmanov MM, Makamov AK, Ayubov MS, Khusenov NN, Buriev ZT, et al. Development of superior fibre quality upland cotton cultivar series ‘Ravnaq’ using marker-assisted selection. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:906472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.906472
  28. 28. Sun F, Chen Q, Jiang M, Gao W, Qu Y. Screening of key drought tolerance indices for cotton at the flowering and boll setting stage using the dimension reduction method. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:619926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.619926

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.