Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Genetic analysis of Indian x East European F2:3 cross for yield traits and erucic acid in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10177
Submitted
22 June 2025
Published
12-12-2025

Abstract

The quality of oil in Brassica juncea is significantly influenced by its erucic acid content, highlighting the need for developing low-erucic acid genotypes through Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS). This study aimed to characterize 175 segregating F₃ genotypes derived from Indian genetic backgrounds from cross between Indian (Pusa Mehak) and East European (Primus) parents using Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequence (CAPS) markers followed by restriction digestion for Fatty Acid Synthesase (FAE) gene’s two paralogs- FAE1.1 and FAE1.2 genes, which govern erucic acid biosynthesis. The genotypic classification based on amplification and restriction digestion revealed six distinct allelic configurations, with FAE1.1 exhibiting a stronger correlation with erucic acid content than FAE1.2. To validate these genetic findings, the biochemical profiling of oil samples by gas chromatography confirmed a bimodal distribution of erucic acid (17.45–50.92 %), with homozygous recessive e₁e₁ genotypes displaying significantly lower erucic acid (22.26 % and 24.44 %) compared to heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes (27.29–45.20 %). However, FAE1.2 did not show a clear association with erucic acid content, indicating its limited contribution to the trait. Gene FAE1.2’s limited role in determining erucic acid levels compared to FAE1.1, could shift selection priorities towards focusing on FAE1.1, making it the primary target for MAS in breeding programs. The study validated MAS as an efficient strategy for early-stage selection of low-erucic acid genotypes, potentially reducing breeding cycles and accelerating the development of superior Indian mustard varieties. The identified seven low-erucic acid genotypes hold promise for breeding programs aimed at improving oil quality. The integration of MAS with morphological and physiological selection criteria could further enhance breeding efficiency and facilitate development of high-yielding, nutritionally improved B. juncea varieties.

References

  1. 1. Hemingway JS. Mustard: Brassica spp. and Sinapis alba (Cruciferae). In: Simmonds NW, editor. Evolution of crop plants. London: Longmans; 1976. p. 56-9
  2. 2. Prakash S, Hinata K. Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassicas: a review. Opera Bot. 1980;55:53-7.
  3. 3. Vaughan JG, Gordon EI. A taxonomic study of Brassica juncea using electrophoresis, gas liquid chromatography and serology. Ann Bot. 1973;37:167-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084670
  4. 4. Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH. Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs). Theor Appl Genet. 1988;75:784-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265606
  5. 5. India. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare. Second advance estimates of production of major agricultural crops (Kharif & Rabi) for 2024–25. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau; 2025.
  6. 6. Renard S, McGregor S. Antithrombogenic effect of erucic acid poor rapeseed oil in rats. Rev Fr Crop Cros. 1992;23:393-6.
  7. 7. Mortuza MG, Dutta PC, Das ML. Erucic acid content in some rapeseed/mustard cultivars developed in Bangladesh. J Sci Food Agric. 2006;86:135-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2301
  8. 8. Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay M, Arumugam N, Verma JK, Gupta V, Pental D, et al. Genetic analysis of total glucosinolate in crosses involving a high glucosinolate Indian variety and a low glucosinolate line of Brassica juncea. Plant Breed. 2002;121:508-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00747.x
  9. 9. James DW, Lim E, Keller J, Plooy I, Ralston E, Dooner HK. Directed tagging of the Arabidopsis fatty acid elongation 1 (FAE1) gene with the maize transposon activator. Plant Cell. 1995;7:309-19. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.3.309
  10. 10. Millar AA, Kunst L. Very-long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis is controlled through the expression and specificity of the condensing enzyme. Plant J. 1997;12:121-31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.12010121.x
  11. 11. Kirk JTO, Hurlstone CJ. Variation and inheritance of erucic acid content in Brassica juncea. Z Pflanzenzücht. 1983;90:331-8.
  12. 12. Gupta V, Mukhopadhyay A, Arumugam N, Sodhi YS, Pental D, Pradhan AK. Molecular tagging of erucic acid trait in oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea) by QTL mapping and single nucleotide polymorphisms in FAE1 gene. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108:743-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1481-z
  13. 13. Saini N, Singh N, Kumar A, Vihan N, Yadav S, Vasudev S, et al. Development and validation of functional CAPS markers for the FAE genes in Brassica juncea and their use in marker-assisted selection. Breed Sci. 2016;66(5):831-7. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.16132
  14. 14. Saikia SL, Rai GK, Salgotra RK, Rai RK, Singh M, Rai PK. Erucic acid and glucosinolate variability in Brassica juncea L. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(6):1223-6.
  15. 15. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419362
  16. 16. Bhandari HR, Bhanu AN, Srivastava K, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants - an overview. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2017;7(3):279-86. https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2017.07.00255
  17. 17. Cobb J, Biswas P, Platten J. Back to the future: revisiting MAS as a tool for modern plant breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3266-4
  18. 18. Saini N, Yashpal, Koramutla MK, Singh N, Singh S, Singh R, et al. Promoter polymorphism in FAE1.1 and FAE1.2 genes associated with erucic acid content in Brassica juncea. Mol Breed. 2019;39:75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-0971-x
  19. 19. Patra N, Barker GC, Maiti MK. Knockout of fatty acid elongase1 homeoalleles in amphidiploid Brassica juncea leads to undetectable erucic acid in seed oil. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;222:109679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109679
  20. 20. Zhang R, Dai C, Gong R, Li K, Zhang C, An Z, et al. Gap-free genome assembly and pan-genome of Brassica juncea provide insights into seed quality improvement and environmental adaptation. Plant Commun. 2025;6(6):2590-3462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101298
  21. 21. Sharma S, Bala M, Kaur G, Tayyab S, Feroz SR. Chemical composition of oil and cake of Brassica juncea: Implications on human and animal health. In: Kole C, Mohapatra T, editors. The Brassica juncea genome. Compendium of plant genomes. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 29-55 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91507-0_3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.