Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Plant-derived coagulants as sustainable alternative for aquaculture wastewater cleanup

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10194
Submitted
23 June 2025
Published
02-01-2026

Abstract

The rapid increase in population and the ongoing depletion of freshwater resources have raised global concerns about water scarcity. In response to this critical issue, there is an urgent need to reuse wastewater by removing contaminants. Chemical coagulants have been excessively used due to their high efficiency, but they come with disadvantages. In this study, a novel approach was explored by utilizing the whole plant (leaves, stem and roots) of two underexplored medicinal plants, Catharanthus roseus and Ocimum tenuiflorum, to evaluate their efficiency in treating aquaculture wastewater. Coagulation experiments were conducted using jar test apparatus. Adsorption of the pollutants on the coagulants through sweep flocculation, pore entrapment and charge neutralization mechanisms were observed through Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) studies. Attenuated Total Reflectance - Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) analysis revealed the key functional groups -OH, C=C and C=N on the coagulants that contributed to flocculation of pollutants. The overall experimental study revealed that all coagulant types were efficient in treating aquaculture wastewater at an optimal dose range of 0.3-0.4 g/L. Catharanthus roseus roots were better at removing turbidity (99 %) followed by total suspended solids (98.3 %) and total dissolved solids (96.3 %). Chlorides, sulphates, phosphates and nitrates were efficiently removed with a blend of C. roseus and O. tenuiflorum. Electrical conductivity was reduced effectively by up to 99 % with O. tenuiflorum seeds. These overall findings indicate an eco-friendly, sustainable solution for aquaculture wastewater treatment.

References

  1. 1. Garlock T, Asche F, Anderson J, Ceballos-Concha A, Love DC, Osmundsen TC, Pincinato RBM. Aquaculture: the missing contributor in the food security agenda. Glob Food Secur. 2022;32:100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100620
  2. 2. Singh BJ, Chakraborty A, Sehgal R. A systematic review of industrial wastewater management: evaluating challenges and enablers. J Environ Manage. 2023;348:119230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119230
  3. 3. Dauda AB, Ajadi A, Tola-Fabunmi AS, Akinwole AO. Waste production in aquaculture: sources, components and managements in different culture systems. Aquac Fish. 2019;4(3):81-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2018.10.002
  4. 4. Iber BT, Kasan NA. Recent advances in shrimp aquaculture wastewater management. Heliyon. 2021;7(11):e08283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08283
  5. 5. Gizaw A, Zewge F, Kumar A, Mekonnen A, Tesfaye M. A comprehensive review on nitrate and phosphate removal and recovery from aqueous solutions by adsorption. J Water Supply Res Technol-Aqua. 2021;70(7):921-47. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2021.070
  6. 6. Ravindiran G, Rajamanickam S, Sivarethinamohan S, Karupaiya Sathaiah B, Ravindran G, Muniasamy SK, Hayder G. A review of the status, effects, prevention and remediation of groundwater contamination for sustainable environment. Water. 2023;15(20):3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203662
  7. 7. Fraga-Corral M, Ronza P, Garcia-Oliveira P, Pereira AG, Losada AP, Prieto MA, et al. Aquaculture as a circular bio-economy model with Galicia as a study case: how to transform waste into revalorized byproducts. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022;119:23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.10.022
  8. 8. El-taweel RM, Mohamed N, Alrefaey KA, Husien S, Abdel-Aziz AB, Salim AI, et al. A review of coagulation explaining its definition, mechanism, coagulant types and optimization models; RSM and ANN. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2023;6:100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2023.100358
  9. 9. Karnena MK, Konni M, Dwarapureddi BK, Saritha V. Blend of natural coagulants as a sustainable solution for challenges of pollution from aquaculture wastewater. Appl Water Sci. 2022;12(3):47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01563-5
  10. 10. Karnena MK, Saritha V. Contemplations and investigations on green coagulants in treatment of surface water: a critical review. Appl Water Sci. 2022;12(7):150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01641-8
  11. 11. Kumar Karnena M, Saritha V. Phytochemical and physicochemical screening of plant-based materials as coagulants for turbidity removal - an unprecedented approach. Watershed Ecol Environ. 2022;4:188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2022.07.002
  12. 12. Soumya V, Kiranmayi P. Potential of Catharanthus roseus applied to remediation of disparate industrial soils owing to accumulation and translocation of metals into plant parts. Int J Phytoremediation. 2023;25(6):746-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2022.2146001
  13. 13. Soumya V, Sowjanya A, Kiranmayi P. Evaluating the status of phytochemicals within Catharanthus roseus due to higher metal stress. Int J Phytoremediation. 2021;23:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1863287
  14. 14. Hira FA, Islam A, Mitra K, Bithi UH, Ahmed KS, Islam S, et al. Comparative analysis of phytochemicals and antioxidant characterization among different parts of Catharanthus roseus: In vitro and in silico investigation. Biochem Res Int. 2024;2024:1904029. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1904029
  15. 15. Qamar F, Sana A, Naveed S, Faizi S. Phytochemical characterization, antioxidant activity and antihypertensive evaluation of Ocimum basilicum L. in l-NAME induced hypertensive rats and its correlation analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e14644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14644
  16. 16. Vara S. Screening and evaluation of innate coagulants for water treatment: a sustainable approach. Int J Energy Environ Eng. 2012;3(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-29
  17. 17. Saritha V, Karnena MK, Dwarapureddi BK. Exploring natural coagulants as impending alternatives towards sustainable water clarification– a comparative studies of natural coagulants with alum. J Water Process Eng. 2019;32:100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100982
  18. 18. Adjovu GE, Stephen H, James D, Ahmad S. Measurement of total dissolved solids and total suspended solids in water systems: a review of the issues, conventional and remote sensing techniques. Remote Sens. 2023;15(14):3534. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143534
  19. 19. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. APHA 2016, Washington DC.
  20. 20. Diver D, Nhapi I, Ruziwa WR. The potential and constraints of replacing conventional chemical coagulants with natural plant extracts in water and wastewater treatment. Environ Adv. 2023;13:100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100421
  21. 21. Saritha V, Karnena MK, Dwarapureddi BK. Competence of blended coagulants for surface water treatment. Appl Water Sci. 2020;10(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1102-4
  22. 22. Rasheed FA, Alkaradaghi K, Al-Ansari N. The potential of Moringa oleifera seed in water coagulation-flocculation technique to reduce water turbidity. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023;234(4):250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06132-3
  23. 23. Shahzadi F, Haydar S, Tabraiz S. Optimization of coagulation to remove turbidity from surface water using novel nature-based plant coagulant and response surface methodology. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072941
  24. 24. Bahrodin MB, Zaidi NS, Kadier A, Hussein N, Syafiuddin A, Boopathy R. A novel natural active coagulant agent extracted from the sugarcane bagasse for wastewater treatment. Appl Sci. 2022;12(16):7972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12167972
  25. 25. Hussain G, Haydar S. Comparative evaluation of Glycine max L. and alum for turbid water treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020;231(2):57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4427-3
  26. 26. Unnisa SA, Bi SZ. Carica papaya seeds effectiveness as coagulant and solar disinfection in removal of turbidity and coliforms. Appl Water Sci. 2018;8(6):149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0781-4
  27. 27. Ahmad A, Abdullah SRS, Hasan HA, Othman AR, Kurniawan SB. Aquaculture wastewater treatment using plant-based coagulants: evaluating removal efficiency through the coagulation-flocculation process. Results Chem. 2024;7:101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101390
  28. 28. Igwegbe CA, Ovuoraye PE, Białowiec A, Okpala COR, Onukwuli OD, Dehghani MH. Purification of aquaculture effluent using Picralima nitida seeds. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25872-1
  29. 29. Geresu BA, Ebba M. Investigations on the removal of phosphate and nitrate using a mixture of cactus and moringa seed powder via RSM techniques. Desalination Water Treat. 2024;320:100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.100856
  30. 30. Lwasa A, Mdee OJ, Ntalikwa JW, Sadiki N. Performance analysis of plant-based coagulants in water purification: a review. Discov Water. 2024;4(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00108-6
  31. 31. Ahmed Hussein M, El-Khateeb Mohamed A, Mohamed NY, Sobhy NA, Fawzy ME. Evaluation of different natural waste materials as bio -coagulants for domestic wastewater treatment. Desalination Water Treat. 2024;317:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.100034
  32. 32. Vezar SAN, Belinda ZT, Rendana M, Agustina TE, Nasir S, Hanum L, Andarini D. The use of Carica papaya seeds as bio coagulant for laundry wastewater treatment. J Eng Appl Sci. 2024;71(1):99.
  33. 33. Chatterjee S, Woo SH. The removal of nitrate from aqueous solutions by chitosan hydrogel beads. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164(2-3):1012-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.020
  34. 34. Aghapour AA, Nemati S, Mohammadi A, Nourmoradi H, Karimzadeh S. Nitrate removal from water using alum and ferric chloride: a comparative study of alum and ferric chloride efficiency. Environ Health Eng Manag. 2016;3(2):69-73.
  35. 35. Soumya V, Kiranmayi P, Siva Kumar K. Morpho-anatomical responses of Catharanthus roseus due to combined heavy metal stress observed under scanning electron microscope. Plant Sci Today. 2022.9(3):623-31. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1621
  36. 36. Kurniawan S, Ahmad A, Imron M, Abdullah SRS, Abu Hasan H, Othman AR, Kuncoro EP. Performance of chemical-based vs biobased coagulants in treating aquaculture wastewater and cost benefit analysis. Pol J Environ Stud. 2023;32(2):1177-87. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/153390
  37. 37. Namane PI, Letshwenyo MW, Yahya A. Evaluation of plant-based coagulants for turbidity removal and coagulant dosage prediction using machine learning. Environ Technol. 2025;46(14):2570-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2023.2291456
  38. 38. Rawat DR, Parmar KM, Thorat SS. Comparative analysis of plant based natural coagulants for wastewater treatment. Curr World Environ. 2025;20(1):395-409.
  39. 39. Igwegbe CA, Onukwuli OD. Removal of total dissolved solids (TDS) from aquaculture wastewater by coagulation-flocculation process using Sesamum indicum extract: effect of operating parameters and coagulation-flocculation kinetics. The Pharm Chem J. 2019;6(4):32-45.
  40. 40. Al-Baldawi IA, Hussain A. Nutrient fate after the coagulation flocculation process of fish-farm water using green coagulant. J Ecol Eng. 2025;26(5):65-72. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/184250
  41. 41. Amin NK, Abdelwahab O, El-Ashtoukhy ESZ, Abdel-Aziz MH. Comparative analysis of new natural coagulant extracts for turbidity removal in water systems. Water Sci Technol. 2025;91(7):797-810. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.372

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.