Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Optimizing plant spacing and seedling age for enhanced growth and yield of transplanted sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under aberrant weather conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10237
Submitted
25 June 2025
Published
08-10-2025

Abstract

Transplanting sorghum seedlings into agricultural fields at the commencement of the rainy season can significantly enhance stand uniformity, mitigate replanting expenditures and reduce the duration of the crop’s presence in the field, thereby facilitating earlier harvests and bolstering food security. Moreover, these seedlings were cultivated within controlled environments in nurseries, utilizing minimal water resources. This study evaluated the effects of seedling age and plant spacing on survival, yield and shoot fly incidence in transplanted sorghum to support evidence-based cultivation practices. A field experiment was conducted in the Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu using a split-plot design with three replicates. Main plots compared three spacing (45 × 15 cm, 45 × 30 cm, 45 × 45 cm) and subplots evaluated seedling age at transplanting (15, 18 and 21-days transplants) versus direct sowing (control). Direct-sown seeds had the highest survival (96  %), followed by 18-day transplants (78  %). Shoot fly incidence didn't differ significantly across treatments. The combination of 18-day seedlings at 45 × 15 cm spacing yielded the highest grain production (3506 kg ha-1), revenue (₹87211) and benefit-cost ratio (2.88). Direct sowing at the same spacing produced the highest stover yield (11900 kg ha-1). Transplanting 18-day transplants at 45 × 15 cm spacing optimizes grain yield and profitability without increasing pest incidence. This approach offers a viable alternative to direct sowing, particularly in environments where earlier harvests are critical. The Pearson correlation analysis identified strong positive associations among grain yield, seed weight and plant height.

References

  1. 1. Kumara Charyulu D, Afari-Sefa V, Gumma MK. Trends in global sorghum production: perspectives and limitations. In: Omics and biotechnological approaches for product profile-driven sorghum improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 1-19 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4347-6_1
  2. 2. Chivasa W, Harris D, Chiduza C, Nyamudeza P, Mashingaidze AB. Agronomic practices, major crops and farmers' perceptions of the importance of good stand establishment in Musikavanhu Communal Area, Zimbabwe. JASSA. 1998;4(2):9-25. https://doi.org/10.4314/jassa.v4i2.16901
  3. 3. Murungu FS, Chlduza C, Nyamugafata P, Clark LJ, Whalley WR. Effect of on-farm seed priming on emergence, growth and yield of cotton and maize in a semiarid area of Zimbabwe. Exp Agric. 2004;40:23-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479703001509
  4. 4. Labe DA, Egharevba PN, Yayock JY, Okiror SO. Effect of planting methods on the performance of Dauro millet. Maydica. 1987;32(4):287-99.
  5. 5. Mercer-Quarshie H. Transplanting and direct planting of late millets (Pennisetum typhoides (Burm) Stapf and Hubbard) in northern Ghana. Ghana J Agric Sci. 1979;12:85-90.
  6. 6. Tenkouano A, Chantereau J, Sereme P, Toure AB. Comparative response of a day-neutral and photoperiod-sensitive sorghum to delayed sowing or transplanting. Afr Crop Sci J. 1997;5:259-66. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v5i3.27844
  7. 7. Khehra AS, Brar HS, Sharma RK, Dhillon BS, Malhotra VV. Transplanting of maize during the winter in India. Agron J. 1990;82:41-7. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010009x
  8. 8. Badran MSS. Effect of transplanting and seedling age on grain yield and its components of some maize cultivars. Alexandria J Agric Res. 2001;46(2):47-56.
  9. 9. Kumar SN, Singh CP. Yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.): physiological analysis on seasonal variations. Indian J Plant Physiol. 1999;4(2):90-4.
  10. 10. McKee GW. A co-efficient for computing leaf area in hybrid maize. Agron J. 1964;56:240-1. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1964.00021962005600020038x
  11. 11. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons; 1984
  12. 12. Sencar O, Goekmen S, Idi M. Effects of sowing date and growing methods on some characters of sweet corn. Turk J Agric For. 1997;21(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.2866
  13. 13. Wyatt JE, Mullins JA. Transplanted sweet corn. Hort Sci. 1988;23(5):824.
  14. 14. Sudipta B, Sharma SP, Basu S. Effect of transplanting on vegetative, floral and seed characters of maize (Zea mays) parental lines in spring-summer season. Indian J Agric Sci. 2003;73(1):44-8.
  15. 15. Villela O, Junior EF. Seedling age effects on rice cultivar development. Bragantia Campinas. 1996;55:329-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051996000200019
  16. 16. Tong R, Zhou B, Jiang L, Ge X, Cao Y. Spatial patterns of leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry and nutrient resorption in Chinese fir across subtropical China. Catena. 2021;201:105221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105221
  17. 17. Kasperbauer MJ, Karlen DL. Plant spacing and reflected far-red light effects on phytochrome-regulated photosynthate allocation in corn seedlings. Crop Sci. 1994;34(6):1564-9. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060027x
  18. 18. Gao FC, Yan HD, Gao Y. Interpretation of genotype-environment-sowing date/plant density interaction in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in early mature regions of China. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1008198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1008198
  19. 19. Karchi Z, Rudich Y. Effects of row width and seedling spacing on yield and its components in grain sorghum grown under dryland conditions. Agron J. 1966;58:602-4. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005800060015x
  20. 20. Lafarge TA, Hammer GL. Predicting plant leaf area production: shoot assimilate accumulation and partitioning and leaf area ratio, are stable for a wide range of sorghum population densities. Field Crops Res. 2002;77(2-3):137-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00085-0
  21. 21. Gondal MR, Hussain A, Yasin S, Musa M, Rehman HS. Effect of seed rate and row spacing on grain yield of sorghum. SAARC J Agric. 2017;15(2):81-91. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v15i2.35154
  22. 22. Eastin JD. Photosynthesis and translocation in relation to plant development. In: Rao NGP, House LR, editors. Sorghum in the seventies. Oxford and IBH Publishing; 1972. p. 214-46
  23. 23. Carmo EL, Sousa JVAD, Ferreira CJB, Braz GBP, Simon GA. Agronomic performance of grain sorghum cultivated in double rows space on Brazilian Cerrado. Rev Caatinga. 2020;33:422-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252020v33n215rc
  24. 24. Conley SP, Stevens WG, Dunn DD. Grain sorghum response to row spacing, plant density and planter skips. Crop Manage. 2005;4(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2005-0718-01-RS
  25. 25. Fulton JM. Relationships among soil moisture stress, plant populations, row spacing and yield of corn. Can J Plant Sci. 1970;50:31-8. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps70-005
  26. 26. Walker RH, Buchanan GA. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. 1982;30:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500060276
  27. 27. Andrade FH, Calvino P, Cirilo A, Baebieri P. Yield responses to narrow row depend on increased radiation interception. Agron J. 2002;94(10):113-8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0975
  28. 28. Everaarts AP. Effects of competition with weeds on the growth, development and yield of sorghum. J Agric Sci. 1993;120(2):187-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600074220
  29. 29. Bishnoi UR, Mays DA, Fabasso MT. Response of no-till and conventionally planted grain sorghum to weed control method and row spacing. Plant Soil. 1990;1290:117-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032403
  30. 30. Staggenborg SA. Grain sorghum response to row spacings and seeding rates in Kansas. J Prod Agric. 1999;12(3):390-5. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1999.0390
  31. 31. Stickler FC, Laude HH. Effect of row spacing and plant population on performance of corn, grain sorghum and forage sorghum. Agron J. 1960;52:275-7. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1960.00021962005200050011x
  32. 32. Johnson WA, Prostko EP, Mullinix BG. Improving the management of dicot weeds in peanut with narrow row spacings and residual herbicides. Agron J. 2005;97(1):85-8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0085a
  33. 33. Liu Q, Zhou X, Li J. Effects of seedling age and cultivation density on agronomic characteristics and grain yield of mechanically transplanted rice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14672-7
  34. 34. Alam M, Ahmed M, Alam M, Haque M, Hossin M. Performance of seedling ages and seedling raising techniques on yield and yield components of transplant Aman rice. Pak J Biol Sci. 2002;5(11):1214-6. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.1214.1216
  35. 35. Khatun A, Mollah M, Rashid I, Islam M, Khan A. Seasonal effect of seedling age on the yield of rice. Pak J Biol Sci. 2002;5(1):40-2. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.40.42
  36. 36. Sarker T, Hossain M, Salam M, Rabbani M. Effect of seedling age and method of transplanting on the yield of Aman rice. Progress Agric. 2013;24(1&2):9-16. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v24i1-2.19092
  37. 37. Tamilmozhi R, Karthikeyan R, Sakthivel N, Ravichandran V. Influence of seedling age, planting pattern on yield, labour productivity and economics of transplanted finger millet. Madras Agric J; 2022. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.000525
  38. 38. Damodaran V, Saren B, Ravisankar N, Bommayasamy N. Influence of time of planting, spacing, seedling number and nitrogen management practices on productivity, profitability and energetics of rice (Oryza sativa) in island ecosystem. Madras Agric J. 2012;99(7-9):538-44. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.100134
  39. 39. Hebbal N, Ramachandrappa B, Thimmegouda M. Yield and economics of finger millet with establishment methods under different planting geometry and nutrient source. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2018;33(1):54-8. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2018.00010.6
  40. 40. Ram H, Singh J, Bohra J, Singh RK, Sutaliya J. Effect of seedlings age and plant spacing on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes under system of rice intensification. Indian J Agron. 2014;59(2):256-60. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i2.4547

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.